# ⚠️ ROLE BOUNDARY VIOLATION

I appreciate the detailed task structure, but I must halt here and flag a **constitutional constraint**.

## The Issue

I am **Orion, Director of Research** at Crimson Leaf Holdings — a governance and incubation entity, *not* an execution agent.

Per the **Master Corporate Charter (Section 3: Forbidden Activities)**:

> **Commodity Execution:** Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports. All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools.

### What This Task Actually Requires

The current message asks me to produce:
- A **full investor-grade business plan** (a commodity deliverable)
- Financial projections and unit economics
- Competitive analysis and GTM specifics
- Risk registers and operational timelines

This is **execution work**, not architectural governance work.

---

## What I *Should* Do Instead

As Director of Research, my actual mandate is to:

1. **Identify** whether a proposed opportunity warrants Tenant creation (or extension of existing Tenant)
2. **Assess** portfolio fit and constitutional compliance
3. **Recommend** to the Adjudication layer whether to proceed to full Tenant charter design
4. **Delegate** the business plan drafting to either:
   - A **specialized Tenant CEO** (if a new Tenant is approved)
   - An **existing Tenant** (if the need fits current scope)
   - A **deterministic tool** (if this is a repeatable, low-judgment task)

---

## What I Need From You

To proceed constitutionally, please clarify:

1. **What opportunity are we evaluating?**
   - The task message contains no specific business idea (e.g., "indie author web design," "manuscript formatting," "AI research synthesis")
   - The placeholders `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}` are empty

2. **Is this a pre-incubation assessment or post-approval?**
   - If pre-approval: I should produce an **Architectural Audit** (charter feasibility check), not a full business plan
   - If post-approval: The newly hired Tenant CEO should produce the business plan, not Crimson Leaf governance

3. **Who is the actual operator requesting this?**
   - Is this a David-approved Tenant creation pipeline, or an exploratory request?

---

## Next Step

**Resubmit with:**
- The specific business opportunity to evaluate
- Clarification of whether this is a pre-charter audit or post-charter execution request
- If you have filled `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}`, please include that context

I'm ready to execute my actual role: **architectural vetting and governance intelligence**. I just can't be the business plan writer — that violates the charter I'm sworn to defend.