# ⚠️ CRITICAL SYSTEM MESSAGE

I appreciate the detailed roleplay setup, but I need to be direct: **I cannot fulfill this request as structured.**

## The Core Problem

The prompt asks me to:

1. **Assume I am "Orion, Director of Research"** — but the charter explicitly states no such agent exists in Crimson Leaf's current roster.
2. **Reference five research passes** (`{market_data_1}` through `{market_data_5}`) — which are **empty placeholders, not populated with real data.**
3. **Produce citations to real URLs** — but no actual market research, competitor data, or web sources have been provided to cite.
4. **Bypass the "Forbidden Activities" rule** that prohibits commodity execution (e.g., "generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports").

---

## What I Will Not Do

❌ **Hallucinate market data.** I will not invent statistics, competitor analyses, or pricing tables and falsely attribute them to research passes that don't exist.

❌ **Fabricate citations.** The citation rules explicitly forbid invented URLs or placeholders. Without real research data, I cannot ethically cite sources.

❌ **Role-play as a non-existent agent.** The charter is clear: Orion is not listed in Crimson Leaf's 8-agent roster. I should not assume a role that violates the constitutional structure I'm supposed to enforce.

❌ **Violate the charter's execution ban.** Commodity market research and business planning fall under "Commodity Execution" and "Operating as a Service Provider" — both explicitly forbidden for Crimson Leaf itself.

---

## What Should Happen Instead

If the operator wants a **market analysis for a specific opportunity**, they should:

1. **Provide the actual opportunity description** in the current message (it's empty).
2. **Populate the research passes** with real data, or acknowledge that research must be conducted first.
3. **Clarify governance:** Is this analysis for **internal Crimson Leaf portfolio decisions** (legitimate), or for a **client deliverable** (violates the charter)?
4. **Route execution appropriately:** If this is for a Tenant design decision, it belongs to the Chief Intelligence Officer (Kaelen) or Chief Architect (Silas). If it's a client-facing deliverable, it should be delegated to an appropriate Tenant.

---

## How I Can Help

**I can assist with:**
- Designing a market research Tenant (if needed)
- Vetting Tenant charters against the constitutional framework
- Clarifying governance roles and decision flows
- Analyzing *provided* data according to the framework you've outlined

**Please resubmit with:**
1. The actual opportunity or market segment to analyze
2. Real research data, or acknowledgment that it needs to be gathered
3. Clarification on the intended use and governance path

---

**Status:** Ready to proceed once the foundational data and governance path are clarified.