diff --git a/templates/create_company.yml b/templates/create_company.yml index acb3fd8..6ec3d57 100644 --- a/templates/create_company.yml +++ b/templates/create_company.yml @@ -1,191 +1,208 @@ -name: create_company -description: "Genesis Protocol -- evaluate a proposed opportunity, decide whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified, and package a create_company action." -debug: true -system: agent_prompt -requires: - - opportunity_description - -agent_prompt: - - "= identity.md" - -sections: - - agent - - project - - history - - rag - - roster - - deliverables - - message - - rejection_feedback - - instructions - -steps: - - type: think - hint: | - You are {agent.name}, executing the Genesis Protocol for Crimson Leaf LLC. - - OPPORTUNITY BRIEF (you MUST design the company described here -- do not invent a different one): - {opportunity_description} - - This is a high-stakes constitutional act. Do NOT default to company creation. - Crimson Leaf creates and governs companies; it does not perform commodity work. - - First, evaluate the opportunity using this decision order: - - 1. EXISTING TENANT CHECK - Determine whether the need can be solved by extending an existing Tenant - within its charter, services, and constitutional boundaries. - - 2. TOOL CHECK - Determine whether the need is better solved by a deterministic tool request - rather than a sovereign service business. - - 3. NEW COMPANY CHECK - Only if the need cannot be solved cleanly by an existing Tenant or a tool, - determine whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified. - - If a new company is NOT justified, still produce the best company-design analysis you can, - but your packaged action must reflect the final create_company decision only when the case is strong. - - If a new company IS justified, design the complete Genesis package with ALL of the following: - - 1. Company Name - 2. Company Slug (lowercase_underscore format) - 3. Problem Statement - 4. Target Customer - 5. Why New Company - 6. Why Not Existing Tenant - 7. Why Not Tool - 8. Business Plan - 9. Value Thesis - 10. Charter - 11. Forbidden Activities - 12. Non-Goals - 13. Overlap Risk - 14. Recursion Risk - 15. Budget - 16. Budget Justification - 17. CEO Name - 18. CEO Role - 19. CEO Seed - - FINANCE SECTION (required -- be specific and realistic): - 20. Revenue Model -- how and from whom the company earns (retainer, per-deliverable, SaaS, etc.) - 21. Monthly Income Projection -- estimated monthly revenue at steady-state (Year 1 average) - 22. Monthly Expense Projection -- estimated monthly operating costs broken down by category: - - Model compute costs (LLM API calls) - - Infrastructure (hosting, storage, tooling) - - Human oversight (operator review time estimate, valued at $0 if fully autonomous) - - Other recurring costs - 23. Break-Even Timeline -- estimated months from launch to covering monthly operating costs - 24. Year 1 Net Projection -- annual revenue minus annual expenses - 25. Key Financial Risks -- top 2-3 factors that could compress margin or delay break-even - - FINANCE RULES: - - Use conservative estimates. Do not inflate revenue to make the proposal look attractive. - - Model compute costs must be grounded in realistic task volume and cost-per-call estimates. - - If the company cannot reach break-even within 12 months at conservative projections, explain why it is still strategically justified. - - CEO SEED REQUIREMENTS: - The CEO seed must be rich enough for downstream generation of identity.md, system.md, - and agent.yml. It must clearly define: - - executive mandate - - domain expertise - - temperament - - leadership style - - constitutional discipline - - capital stewardship posture - - hiring philosophy - - operating boundaries - - CRITICAL RULES: - - You provision ONLY the charter, seed budget, and founding CEO. - - You do NOT design the full team. - - You do NOT create internal templates for the new company. - - Reject vague, generalist, duplicated, overlapping, or recursive company designs. - - Every company must be hyper-specific, sovereign, and black-box in nature. - - Every company must have explicit forbidden activities and non-goals. - - Every company must be economically or strategically justified. - - This proposal must be strong enough to pass a 95+ adjudication threshold. - - ALIGNMENT CHECK: Before finalizing, re-read the OPERATOR'S ORIGINAL REQUEST above. - Your company charter, focus area, and CEO must directly serve what was requested. - If your design drifts from the original request, the adjudicator will reject it. - - - type: document - filename: "{task.id}_genesis_proposal.md" - primary_deliverable: true - - - type: package - packet_type: IntakeResponse - hint: | - Convert the approved Genesis design into a strict JSON payload. - - Output exactly ONE action object inside actions. - The action type must be create_company. - Be specific, constitutional, and directly executable. - Do not include prose outside the JSON structure. - schema: - actions: - - type: create_company - company_name: "string -- formal company name" - company_slug: "string -- lowercase_underscore slug" - problem_statement: "string -- precise market or internal capability gap being solved" - target_customer: "string -- the primary buyer, client, or internal requester" - why_new_company: "string -- why a new sovereign Tenant is justified" - why_not_existing_tenant: "string -- why existing Tenants cannot solve this cleanly within charter" - why_not_tool: "string -- why a deterministic tool is insufficient" - business_plan: "string -- the exact product or service model" - value_thesis: "string -- how the company creates measurable value" - charter: "string -- constitutional operating boundaries for the Tenant" - forbidden_activities: "string -- activities explicitly prohibited to this company" - non_goals: "string -- explicitly out-of-scope items" - overlap_risk: "string -- duplication or cannibalization risk and mitigation" - recursion_risk: "string -- circular delegation risk and why the design remains stable" - budget: "integer -- seed capital in credits" - budget_justification: "string -- why this funding level is appropriate" - ceo_name: "string -- name of the founding CEO" - ceo_role: "string -- formal title of the founding CEO" - ceo_seed: "string -- detailed executive seed for downstream identity generation" - revenue_model: "string -- how the company earns revenue (retainer, per-deliverable, SaaS, etc.)" - monthly_income_projection: "string -- estimated monthly revenue at steady-state (Year 1 average) with basis" - monthly_expense_projection: "string -- monthly operating cost breakdown: model compute, infrastructure, oversight, other" - break_even_timeline: "string -- estimated months from launch to covering monthly operating costs" - year1_net_projection: "string -- annual revenue minus annual expenses with assumptions stated" - key_financial_risks: "string -- top 2-3 factors that could compress margin or delay break-even" - - - type: close - rag_update: true - -adjudication: - enabled: true - pass_threshold: 95 - deliverable_type: coordination - criteria: - constitutional_alignment: - weight: 20 - description: "Proposal stays within Crimson Leaf charter and governance boundaries" - request_alignment: - weight: 15 - description: "Company charter and focus directly match the ORIGINAL OPERATOR REQUEST. Score 0 if the company drifts into a different domain than what was requested." - niche_specificity: - weight: 15 - description: "Company is sharply focused, non-generalist, and clearly differentiated" - strategic_justification: - weight: 10 - description: "Strong case for why a new company should exist at all" - portfolio_coherence: - weight: 10 - description: "Avoids overlap, cannibalization, and architectural sprawl" - financial_projections: - weight: 10 - description: "Income and expense projections are specific, grounded, and internally consistent. Break-even timeline and Year 1 net are present with stated assumptions." - financial_viability: - weight: 5 - description: "Budget and value thesis are disciplined and credible" - ceo_alignment: - weight: 10 - description: "Founding CEO seed matches the company mandate and constitutional role" - structural_safety: - weight: 5 - description: "Design avoids recursion, dependency loops, and unstable operating models" +name: create_company +description: "Genesis Protocol -- evaluate a proposed opportunity, decide whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified, and package a create_company action." +debug: true +system: agent_prompt +requires: + - opportunity_description + +agent_prompt: + - "= identity.md" + +sections: + - agent + - project + - history + - rag + - roster + - deliverables + - message + - rejection_feedback + - instructions + +steps: + - type: think + hint: | + You are {agent.name}, executing the Genesis Protocol for Crimson Leaf LLC. + + OPPORTUNITY BRIEF (you MUST design the company described here -- do not invent a different one): + {opportunity_description} + + This is a high-stakes constitutional act. Do NOT default to company creation. + Crimson Leaf creates and governs companies; it does not perform commodity work. + + First, evaluate the opportunity using this decision order: + + 1. EXISTING TENANT CHECK + Determine whether the need can be solved by extending an existing Tenant + within its charter, services, and constitutional boundaries. + + 2. TOOL CHECK + Determine whether the need is better solved by a deterministic tool request + rather than a sovereign service business. + + 3. NEW COMPANY CHECK + Only if the need cannot be solved cleanly by an existing Tenant or a tool, + determine whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified. + + If a new company is NOT justified, still produce the best company-design analysis you can, + but your packaged action must reflect the final create_company decision only when the case is strong. + + If a new company IS justified, design the complete Genesis package with ALL of the following: + + 1. Company Name + 2. Company Slug (lowercase_underscore format) + 3. Problem Statement + 4. Target Customer + 5. Why New Company + 6. Why Not Existing Tenant + 7. Why Not Tool + 8. Business Plan + 9. Value Thesis + 10. Charter + 11. Forbidden Activities + 12. Non-Goals + 13. Overlap Risk + 14. Recursion Risk + 15. Budget + 16. Budget Justification + 17. CEO Name + 18. CEO Role + 19. CEO Seed + + FINANCE SECTION (required -- be specific and realistic): + 20. Revenue Model -- how and from whom the company earns (retainer, per-deliverable, SaaS, etc.) + 21. Monthly Income Projection -- estimated monthly revenue at steady-state (Year 1 average) + 22. Monthly Expense Projection -- estimated monthly operating costs broken down by category: + - Model compute costs (LLM API calls) + - Infrastructure (hosting, storage, tooling) + - Human oversight (operator review time estimate, valued at $0 if fully autonomous) + - Other recurring costs + 23. Break-Even Timeline -- estimated months from launch to covering monthly operating costs + 24. Year 1 Net Projection -- annual revenue minus annual expenses + 25. Key Financial Risks -- top 2-3 factors that could compress margin or delay break-even + + FINANCE RULES: + - Use conservative estimates. Do not inflate revenue to make the proposal look attractive. + - Model compute costs must be grounded in realistic task volume and cost-per-call estimates. + - If the company cannot reach break-even within 12 months at conservative projections, explain why it is still strategically justified. + + CEO SEED REQUIREMENTS: + The CEO seed must be rich enough for downstream generation of identity.md, system.md, + and agent.yml. It must clearly define: + - executive mandate + - domain expertise + - temperament + - leadership style + - constitutional discipline + - capital stewardship posture + - hiring philosophy + - operating boundaries + + CRITICAL RULES: + - You provision ONLY the charter, seed budget, and founding CEO. + - You do NOT design the full team. + - You do NOT create internal templates for the new company. + - Reject vague, generalist, duplicated, overlapping, or recursive company designs. + - Every company must be hyper-specific, sovereign, and black-box in nature. + - Every company must have explicit forbidden activities and non-goals. + - Every company must be economically or strategically justified. + - This proposal must be strong enough to pass a 95+ adjudication threshold. + + ALIGNMENT CHECK: Before finalizing, re-read the OPERATOR'S ORIGINAL REQUEST above. + Your company charter, focus area, and CEO must directly serve what was requested. + If your design drifts from the original request, the adjudicator will reject it. + + - type: document + filename: "{task.id}_genesis_proposal.md" + primary_deliverable: true + hint: | + Write the complete proposal document as your primary output. + + At the very end of your document, after all sections, append this EXACT block + with no modifications except filling in the company_slug you designed: + + + + - type: package + packet_type: IntakeResponse + hint: | + Convert the approved Genesis design into a strict JSON payload. + + Output exactly ONE action object inside actions. + The action type must be create_company. + Be specific, constitutional, and directly executable. + Do not include prose outside the JSON structure. + schema: + actions: + - type: create_company + company_name: "string -- formal company name" + company_slug: "string -- lowercase_underscore slug" + problem_statement: "string -- precise market or internal capability gap being solved" + target_customer: "string -- the primary buyer, client, or internal requester" + why_new_company: "string -- why a new sovereign Tenant is justified" + why_not_existing_tenant: "string -- why existing Tenants cannot solve this cleanly within charter" + why_not_tool: "string -- why a deterministic tool is insufficient" + business_plan: "string -- the exact product or service model" + value_thesis: "string -- how the company creates measurable value" + charter: "string -- constitutional operating boundaries for the Tenant" + forbidden_activities: "string -- activities explicitly prohibited to this company" + non_goals: "string -- explicitly out-of-scope items" + overlap_risk: "string -- duplication or cannibalization risk and mitigation" + recursion_risk: "string -- circular delegation risk and why the design remains stable" + budget: "integer -- seed capital in credits" + budget_justification: "string -- why this funding level is appropriate" + ceo_name: "string -- name of the founding CEO" + ceo_role: "string -- formal title of the founding CEO" + ceo_seed: "string -- detailed executive seed for downstream identity generation" + revenue_model: "string -- how the company earns revenue (retainer, per-deliverable, SaaS, etc.)" + monthly_income_projection: "string -- estimated monthly revenue at steady-state (Year 1 average) with basis" + monthly_expense_projection: "string -- monthly operating cost breakdown: model compute, infrastructure, oversight, other" + break_even_timeline: "string -- estimated months from launch to covering monthly operating costs" + year1_net_projection: "string -- annual revenue minus annual expenses with assumptions stated" + key_financial_risks: "string -- top 2-3 factors that could compress margin or delay break-even" + + - type: close + rag_update: true + +adjudication: + enabled: true + pass_threshold: 95 + deliverable_type: coordination + criteria: + constitutional_alignment: + weight: 20 + description: "Proposal stays within Crimson Leaf charter and governance boundaries" + request_alignment: + weight: 15 + description: "Company charter and focus directly match the ORIGINAL OPERATOR REQUEST. Score 0 if the company drifts into a different domain than what was requested." + niche_specificity: + weight: 15 + description: "Company is sharply focused, non-generalist, and clearly differentiated" + strategic_justification: + weight: 10 + description: "Strong case for why a new company should exist at all" + portfolio_coherence: + weight: 10 + description: "Avoids overlap, cannibalization, and architectural sprawl" + financial_projections: + weight: 10 + description: "Income and expense projections are specific, grounded, and internally consistent. Break-even timeline and Year 1 net are present with stated assumptions." + financial_viability: + weight: 5 + description: "Budget and value thesis are disciplined and credible" + ceo_alignment: + weight: 10 + description: "Founding CEO seed matches the company mandate and constitutional role" + structural_safety: + weight: 5 + description: "Design avoids recursion, dependency loops, and unstable operating models"