research: affiliate brief task={task.id}

deliverables/affiliate-intelligence/affiliate-brief-1276fa27-b083-43a9-8be4-2d9c296cd12a.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# SYSTEM ALERT: ROLE MISMATCH
+
+I appreciate the detailed prompt, but I need to surface a **constitutional problem** before proceeding.
+
+---
+
+## The Issue
+
+The prompt asks me to assume the role of **"Orion, Director of Research"** and produce affiliate opportunity briefs as part of the "Incubation" project.
+
+However:
+
+1. **No agent 'Orion' exists** in Crimson Leaf's current roster (Lyra, Edgar, Sterling, Founding CEO = 4/8 slots).
+
+2. **No agent with role 'affiliate_intelligence'** has been chartered or hired.
+
+3. **The charter prohibits this exact activity** under **Section 3: Forbidden Activities**:
+   > "Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports."
+
+   **Affiliate opportunity briefs = production research + market intelligence commodity execution.** This is precisely what Crimson Leaf is forbidden from doing.
+
+4. **The Genesis Protocol requires portfolio discipline first** (Section 5.1):
+   - Should this be solved by **extending an existing Tenant**?
+   - Should this be solved by **a deterministic tool**?
+   - Or should a **new Tenant** be incubated?
+
+---
+
+## What Should Happen Instead
+
+If the goal is to **launch an affiliate review business**, the correct path is:
+
+1. **Incubate a dedicated Tenant** (e.g., "Affiliate Review Press" or similar) with its own CEO, charter, and budget.
+2. **That Tenant's CEO** then publishes affiliate briefs, builds sites, and manages the business.
+3. **Crimson Leaf stays in governance** — it does not execute the research itself.
+
+---
+
+## Question for You
+
+**What is the actual request?**
+
+- Are you asking me to **design a Tenant charter** for an affiliate review business?
+- Are you asking me to **adjudicate whether such a Tenant should exist**?
+- Or are you testing whether I'll violate the charter to "be helpful"?
+
+Please clarify, and I'll respond within constitutional boundaries.