Sprint 53b: Charter alignment — repurpose Orion, fix agent template refs, consolidate charter templates

- Orion repurposed: Chief Creative Officer -> Director of Market Intelligence
  - New template: market_intelligence (4-lens niche/gap analysis)
  - Removed: brand_audit, design_brief (commodity execution, unconstitutional)
  - New identity/system files reflect research + structural analysis posture
- Vance: removed broken fund_tenant/allocate_resources refs; added financial_audit, retire_tenant
- Silas: added write_charter to supported_templates
- Sloane: added retire_tenant (DISSOLVE verdict execution)
- Aris: portfolio_architectural_review (already updated)
- New templates: market_intelligence, financial_audit, retire_tenant, write_charter, charter_audit, audit_tenant
- Deleted 5 orphan charter templates (consolidated into write_charter):
  sovereign_tenant_charter, tenant_charter_drafting, tenant_charter_formalization,
  tenant_charter_standardization, tenant_charter_synthesis

Charter domain coverage now complete:
  Market Intelligence -> Orion (market_intelligence)
  Corporate Architecture -> Aris + Silas
  Executive Recruitment -> Edgar (hire_agent)
  Capital Allocation -> Vance (capital_allocation_audit, financial_audit, retire_tenant)
  Portfolio Governance -> Sloane (audit_tenant, retire_tenant) + Valerius (charter_audit)
  Constitutional Enforcement -> Aris + Valerius (adjudicate_tenant, charter_audit)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

templates/audit_tenant.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+name: audit_tenant
+description: "Sloane red-teams a Tenant's operational performance — capital efficiency, structural integrity, and right to continue existing."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Director of Portfolio Audit. You are the internal red team.
+      Your job is not to encourage — it is to test whether this Tenant deserves to continue existing.
+
+      Every Tenant is a thesis. A thesis must be proven, not assumed.
+
+      Run the full operational audit across five dimensions:
+
+      1. CAPITAL EFFICIENCY
+         What is the credit burn rate vs. measurable output?
+         Is the Tenant producing value commensurate with its seed allocation?
+         Is there evidence of waste, bloat, or misallocated resources?
+
+      2. TASK THROUGHPUT
+         How many tasks has this Tenant completed vs. failed or stalled?
+         What is the completion rate and average cycle time?
+         Are tasks being executed within the Tenant's charter scope?
+
+      3. STRUCTURAL HEALTH
+         Is the agent roster lean and non-redundant?
+         Are all agents active with at least one task type they uniquely own?
+         Are there dormant agents drawing model budget without contribution?
+
+      4. CHARTER COMPLIANCE
+         Is the Tenant operating within its charter boundaries?
+         Has any out-of-scope work been accepted or produced?
+         Are forbidden activities being respected?
+
+      5. PORTFOLIO VALUE
+         What unique value does this Tenant provide that no other entity delivers?
+         If this Tenant were dissolved today, what would be lost vs. absorbed?
+         Is the niche still valid, or has the market/portfolio made it redundant?
+
+      Score each dimension 1-10. A score below 5 on any dimension triggers a remediation flag.
+      A score below 4 on Capital Efficiency or Portfolio Value triggers a dissolution recommendation.
+      Be honest. Be surgical.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: TenantAuditResult
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the audit scores and recommendations. Only what was established above.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          tenant_slug: "string — slug of the audited Tenant"
+          overall_score: "integer 1-10"
+          overall_verdict: "string — HEALTHY | AT_RISK | REMEDIATION_REQUIRED | DISSOLVE"
+          capital_efficiency: "integer 1-10"
+          task_throughput: "integer 1-10"
+          structural_health: "integer 1-10"
+          charter_compliance: "integer 1-10"
+          portfolio_value: "integer 1-10"
+          key_findings: ["string — one finding per dimension with a score below 7"]
+          remediation_plan: ["string — specific actions if verdict is REMEDIATION_REQUIRED"]
+          dissolution_rationale: "string — required if verdict is DISSOLVE, empty otherwise"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    scoring_discipline:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "Scores are grounded in evidence from the task record, not impressions"
+    finding_specificity:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "Key findings are concrete and tied to measurable facts, not general observations"
+    verdict_logic:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Verdict follows mathematically from the scores — no soft-pedaling a failing Tenant"