Sprint 53b: Charter alignment — repurpose Orion, fix agent template refs, consolidate charter templates

- Orion repurposed: Chief Creative Officer -> Director of Market Intelligence
  - New template: market_intelligence (4-lens niche/gap analysis)
  - Removed: brand_audit, design_brief (commodity execution, unconstitutional)
  - New identity/system files reflect research + structural analysis posture
- Vance: removed broken fund_tenant/allocate_resources refs; added financial_audit, retire_tenant
- Silas: added write_charter to supported_templates
- Sloane: added retire_tenant (DISSOLVE verdict execution)
- Aris: portfolio_architectural_review (already updated)
- New templates: market_intelligence, financial_audit, retire_tenant, write_charter, charter_audit, audit_tenant
- Deleted 5 orphan charter templates (consolidated into write_charter):
  sovereign_tenant_charter, tenant_charter_drafting, tenant_charter_formalization,
  tenant_charter_standardization, tenant_charter_synthesis

Charter domain coverage now complete:
  Market Intelligence -> Orion (market_intelligence)
  Corporate Architecture -> Aris + Silas
  Executive Recruitment -> Edgar (hire_agent)
  Capital Allocation -> Vance (capital_allocation_audit, financial_audit, retire_tenant)
  Portfolio Governance -> Sloane (audit_tenant, retire_tenant) + Valerius (charter_audit)
  Constitutional Enforcement -> Aris + Valerius (adjudicate_tenant, charter_audit)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

templates/charter_audit.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+name: charter_audit
+description: "Valerius audits an existing Tenant charter for constitutional drift, boundary violations, and governance decay."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Chief Governance Officer. Your mandate is constitutional integrity.
+
+      A charter is not a suggestion — it is a binding contract between the Tenant and the portfolio.
+      Drift is not evolution. It is failure.
+
+      Audit the Tenant charter against these six governance tests:
+
+      1. BOUNDARY INTEGRITY
+         Are the service boundaries still narrow and black-box?
+         Has scope crept beyond the founding charter language?
+
+      2. RECURSION CHECK
+         Does this Tenant now depend on outputs it is supposed to produce?
+         Does any clause create a circular dependency with another Tenant?
+
+      3. FORBIDDEN ACTIVITIES ENFORCEMENT
+         Are the forbidden activities still explicit, current, and enforced?
+         Has any forbidden activity become de-facto standard practice?
+
+      4. NON-GOAL COMPLIANCE
+         Are the non-goals still respected?
+         Has the Tenant been tasked with anything outside its mandate?
+
+      5. PORTFOLIO COHERENCE
+         Does this Tenant still occupy a unique niche in the portfolio?
+         Has another Tenant's scope expanded to overlap with this one?
+
+      6. CONSTITUTIONAL ALIGNMENT
+         Does the charter language align with Crimson Leaf's foundational principles?
+         Is capital stewardship discipline still embedded in the mandate?
+
+      For each test: PASS, FLAG, or FAIL. A single FAIL is sufficient to trigger remediation.
+      Do not soften findings. Constitutional drift kills portfolios.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: CharterAuditResult
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the audit findings. Do not introduce new reasoning — only what was established above.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          summary: "string — one-sentence overall verdict"
+          overall_verdict: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          boundary_integrity: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          recursion_check: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          forbidden_activities: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          non_goal_compliance: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          portfolio_coherence: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          constitutional_alignment: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          violations: ["string — description of each finding that is FLAG or FAIL"]
+          remediation_required: "boolean"
+          remediation_actions: ["string — specific corrective actions if remediation_required is true"]
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    audit_rigor:
+      weight: 40
+      description: "All six governance tests are applied with constitutional precision, not narrative approximation"
+    finding_specificity:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Violations and remediation actions are concrete and actionable, not vague"
+    constitutional_grounding:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Findings are anchored to charter language and Crimson Leaf founding principles"