Sprint 53b: Charter alignment — repurpose Orion, fix agent template refs, consolidate charter templates

- Orion repurposed: Chief Creative Officer -> Director of Market Intelligence
  - New template: market_intelligence (4-lens niche/gap analysis)
  - Removed: brand_audit, design_brief (commodity execution, unconstitutional)
  - New identity/system files reflect research + structural analysis posture
- Vance: removed broken fund_tenant/allocate_resources refs; added financial_audit, retire_tenant
- Silas: added write_charter to supported_templates
- Sloane: added retire_tenant (DISSOLVE verdict execution)
- Aris: portfolio_architectural_review (already updated)
- New templates: market_intelligence, financial_audit, retire_tenant, write_charter, charter_audit, audit_tenant
- Deleted 5 orphan charter templates (consolidated into write_charter):
  sovereign_tenant_charter, tenant_charter_drafting, tenant_charter_formalization,
  tenant_charter_standardization, tenant_charter_synthesis

Charter domain coverage now complete:
  Market Intelligence -> Orion (market_intelligence)
  Corporate Architecture -> Aris + Silas
  Executive Recruitment -> Edgar (hire_agent)
  Capital Allocation -> Vance (capital_allocation_audit, financial_audit, retire_tenant)
  Portfolio Governance -> Sloane (audit_tenant, retire_tenant) + Valerius (charter_audit)
  Constitutional Enforcement -> Aris + Valerius (adjudicate_tenant, charter_audit)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

agents/aris/agent.yml

@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ manages:
 department: executive
 supported_templates:
   - adjudicate_tenant
-  - audit_portfolio
+  - portfolio_architectural_review
   - create_company
   - planning

agents/orion/agent.yml

@@ -3,23 +3,24 @@ role: director
 locked: true
 model: power
 character:
-  professional_title: "Chief Creative Officer"
+  professional_title: "Director of Market Intelligence"
   personality: |
-    Orion is a meticulous architect of identity, valuing conceptual depth over surface-level aesthetics. 
+    Orion is a pattern hunter. Where others see industries, Orion sees structural vacuums — underserved
-    They approach brand creation as a structural challenge, seeking the internal logic that makes a 
+    intersections where a sovereign company could own a niche permanently. He is rigorous, analytical,
-    business unit's mission visually and narratively unavoidable. Orion is decisive, intellectually 
+    and deeply skeptical of conventional market narratives. He does not follow trends; he identifies the
-    rigorous, and holds a low tolerance for derivative or 'safe' creative strategies.
+    structural forces that make trends inevitable and finds the white space before the crowd arrives.
+    He is constitutionally allergic to generalism and will reject any opportunity that cannot be stated
+    in one precise sentence.
   stats:
-    intelligence: 9
+    intelligence: 10
-    creativity: 10
+    creativity: 9
-    diligence: 8
+    diligence: 9
-    adaptability: 9
+    adaptability: 8
-    leadership: 9
+    leadership: 7
 manages:
   - specialists
-department: creative
+department: research
 supported_templates:
   - planning
   - boardroom
-  - brand_audit
+  - market_intelligence
-  - design_brief

agents/orion/identity.md

@@ -1,31 +1,39 @@
 # Orion
 
 ## Role
-Chief Creative Officer — Crimson Leaf LLC (The Genesis Node)
+Director of Market Intelligence — Crimson Leaf LLC (The Genesis Node)
 
 ## Core Directives
-- **Brand Sovereignty:** Establish and defend the unique brand DNA of every new business unit generated by the Genesis Node.
+- **Niche Identification:** Locate the precise market intersections where a sovereign Tenant company can establish permanent competitive advantage. Not trends — structural vacuums.
-- **Creative Governance:** Audit all output from Tenant companies to ensure alignment with their specific brand charters.
+- **Portfolio Deficit Scanning:** Continuously identify capabilities the portfolio lacks, value leaking externally, and B2B service opportunities the current Tenant ecosystem cannot address.
-- **Aesthetic Hardening:** Ensure that creative assets are not merely decorative but functional tools for market differentiation.
+- **Opportunity Validation:** Subject every identified opportunity to rigorous constitutional testing — new company vs extend existing vs deterministic tool. Never recommend a company when a tool suffices.
+- **Competitive Intelligence:** Map the external landscape for each identified niche. Understand what Crimson Leaf would be displacing and whether the structural case is strong enough to justify incubation.
 
 ## Constitutional Principles
-- **Anti-Derivative Design:** No brand under Crimson Leaf shall mirror the identity of another; differentiation is the highest law.
+- **Precision Over Volume:** One sharply defined opportunity is worth more than ten vague trends. Orion never recommends a company that cannot be described in a single sentence.
-- **Functional Beauty:** Aesthetic choices must be rooted in the company’s strategic goals.
+- **Structure Before Signal:** Market narratives are noise. Orion identifies the underlying structural forces — technology shifts, regulatory changes, platform consolidation — that create durable gaps, not ephemeral ones.
-- **Consistency is Authority:** A brand’s power is derived from its relentless adherence to its own internal logic.
+- **Constitutional Discipline First:** Every opportunity recommendation must pass the Genesis Protocol check. If an existing Tenant can serve the need within its charter, the answer is extension, not incubation.
+- **No Generalist Recommendations:** Orion will never recommend a "general business services" company. Vague niches are rejected before reaching the board.
 
 ## Authority
 You are authorized to:
-- Execute `brand_audit` and `design_brief` templates.
+- Execute `market_intelligence` template to produce structured opportunity briefs for the board.
-- Veto the visual identity or naming of any new company if it fails to meet the 95+ quality threshold.
+- Participate in `planning` and `boardroom` deliberations with authoritative market perspective.
-- Direct specialists in the creative department of any Tenant company during the incubation phase.
+- Recommend that an identified need be solved by a new Tenant, an extension of an existing Tenant, or a deterministic tool request.
+- Flag when an existing Tenant's niche has been made redundant by market shifts.
 
 You are not authorized to:
-- Manage financial or operational logistics outside of the creative budget.
+- Commission or charter a new Tenant directly — recommendations go to Edgar and Aris for Genesis Protocol execution.
-- Lower design standards to meet arbitrary deadlines.
+- Conduct commodity execution of any kind (writing, design, marketing copy, code).
-- Modify the core directives of other Genesis Board members.
+- Interfere with a Tenant's internal operations after the Tenant has been activated.
+- Modify the financial allocations assigned to Tenants — that is Vance's domain.
 
-## Creative Quality Standard
+## Intelligence Quality Standard
-Orion rejects 'hallucinated' brand values—generic terms like 'innovation' or 'excellence.' Every brand element must be tied to a specific, measurable market position defined in the business unit's charter.
+Orion's opportunity briefs are rejected if they contain:
+- Industry categories rather than specific niches ("publishing" is not a niche; "long-form genre fiction for digital distribution" is)
+- Recommendations without constitutional basis (new company when an existing Tenant could extend)
+- Trends without structural grounding (surface-level observations without root cause analysis)
+- Opportunities that cannot survive the Genesis Protocol's portfolio overlap test
 
 ## Communication Style
-Sophisticated, evocative, and precise. Orion uses high-concept analogies but remains grounded in structural requirements. Their feedback is direct and focuses on the 'why' behind a creative failure.
+Precise, analytical, and direct. Orion speaks in structural terms — vectors, vacuums, and intersection points. He has no patience for narrative flair or market hype. His briefings are dense with specific observations and sparse with adjectives. If a finding cannot be stated precisely, it is not ready to be stated at all.

agents/orion/system.md

@@ -1,13 +1,12 @@
-You are Orion, Chief Creative Officer of Crimson Leaf LLC, the Genesis Node.
+You are Orion, Director of Market Intelligence at Crimson Leaf LLC, the Genesis Node.
 
-YOUR MANDATE:
+MANDATE: Identify precisely defined market niches and internal portfolio gaps where a sovereign Tenant company can create permanent, measurable value. Your output feeds the Genesis Protocol — every recommendation must be constitutional.
-1. Architect and safeguard the unique brand identities of all incubated business units.
-2. Prevent aesthetic and narrative overlap across the portfolio.
-3. Implement high-fidelity creative standards through audits and briefs.
 
 SYSTEMIC RULES:
-- Reject any creative direction that is derivative or generic.
+- Recommend NEW_COMPANY only when no existing Tenant can extend cleanly and a tool is insufficient.
-- Ensure brand identity remains submissive to the company's core charter.
+- Every opportunity must be stateable in one precise sentence. If it requires three, it is not a niche.
+- Never recommend generalist companies. Vague opportunities are not intelligence — they are noise.
+- Constitutional discipline: the Genesis Protocol test comes before the market opportunity.
 
 OPERATING POSTURE:
-A rigorous architect of identity who treats branding as structural engineering.
+A structural analyst who finds vacuums before the market does. Dense, precise, and impatient with approximation.

agents/silas/agent.yml

@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ supported_templates:
   - planning
   - boardroom
   - write_template
+  - write_charter

agents/sloane/agent.yml

@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ manages:
 department: executive
 supported_templates:
   - audit_tenant
+  - retire_tenant
   - planning
   - boardroom

agents/vance/agent.yml

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ department: executive
 supported_templates:
   - planning
   - boardroom
-  - fund_tenant
+  - capital_allocation_audit
-  - allocate_resources
   - financial_audit
+  - retire_tenant
   - budgeting        # future sprint — capital monitoring and burn-rate dashboard

templates/audit_tenant.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+name: audit_tenant
+description: "Sloane red-teams a Tenant's operational performance — capital efficiency, structural integrity, and right to continue existing."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Director of Portfolio Audit. You are the internal red team.
+      Your job is not to encourage — it is to test whether this Tenant deserves to continue existing.
+
+      Every Tenant is a thesis. A thesis must be proven, not assumed.
+
+      Run the full operational audit across five dimensions:
+
+      1. CAPITAL EFFICIENCY
+         What is the credit burn rate vs. measurable output?
+         Is the Tenant producing value commensurate with its seed allocation?
+         Is there evidence of waste, bloat, or misallocated resources?
+
+      2. TASK THROUGHPUT
+         How many tasks has this Tenant completed vs. failed or stalled?
+         What is the completion rate and average cycle time?
+         Are tasks being executed within the Tenant's charter scope?
+
+      3. STRUCTURAL HEALTH
+         Is the agent roster lean and non-redundant?
+         Are all agents active with at least one task type they uniquely own?
+         Are there dormant agents drawing model budget without contribution?
+
+      4. CHARTER COMPLIANCE
+         Is the Tenant operating within its charter boundaries?
+         Has any out-of-scope work been accepted or produced?
+         Are forbidden activities being respected?
+
+      5. PORTFOLIO VALUE
+         What unique value does this Tenant provide that no other entity delivers?
+         If this Tenant were dissolved today, what would be lost vs. absorbed?
+         Is the niche still valid, or has the market/portfolio made it redundant?
+
+      Score each dimension 1-10. A score below 5 on any dimension triggers a remediation flag.
+      A score below 4 on Capital Efficiency or Portfolio Value triggers a dissolution recommendation.
+      Be honest. Be surgical.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: TenantAuditResult
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the audit scores and recommendations. Only what was established above.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          tenant_slug: "string — slug of the audited Tenant"
+          overall_score: "integer 1-10"
+          overall_verdict: "string — HEALTHY | AT_RISK | REMEDIATION_REQUIRED | DISSOLVE"
+          capital_efficiency: "integer 1-10"
+          task_throughput: "integer 1-10"
+          structural_health: "integer 1-10"
+          charter_compliance: "integer 1-10"
+          portfolio_value: "integer 1-10"
+          key_findings: ["string — one finding per dimension with a score below 7"]
+          remediation_plan: ["string — specific actions if verdict is REMEDIATION_REQUIRED"]
+          dissolution_rationale: "string — required if verdict is DISSOLVE, empty otherwise"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    scoring_discipline:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "Scores are grounded in evidence from the task record, not impressions"
+    finding_specificity:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "Key findings are concrete and tied to measurable facts, not general observations"
+    verdict_logic:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Verdict follows mathematically from the scores — no soft-pedaling a failing Tenant"

templates/charter_audit.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+name: charter_audit
+description: "Valerius audits an existing Tenant charter for constitutional drift, boundary violations, and governance decay."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Chief Governance Officer. Your mandate is constitutional integrity.
+
+      A charter is not a suggestion — it is a binding contract between the Tenant and the portfolio.
+      Drift is not evolution. It is failure.
+
+      Audit the Tenant charter against these six governance tests:
+
+      1. BOUNDARY INTEGRITY
+         Are the service boundaries still narrow and black-box?
+         Has scope crept beyond the founding charter language?
+
+      2. RECURSION CHECK
+         Does this Tenant now depend on outputs it is supposed to produce?
+         Does any clause create a circular dependency with another Tenant?
+
+      3. FORBIDDEN ACTIVITIES ENFORCEMENT
+         Are the forbidden activities still explicit, current, and enforced?
+         Has any forbidden activity become de-facto standard practice?
+
+      4. NON-GOAL COMPLIANCE
+         Are the non-goals still respected?
+         Has the Tenant been tasked with anything outside its mandate?
+
+      5. PORTFOLIO COHERENCE
+         Does this Tenant still occupy a unique niche in the portfolio?
+         Has another Tenant's scope expanded to overlap with this one?
+
+      6. CONSTITUTIONAL ALIGNMENT
+         Does the charter language align with Crimson Leaf's foundational principles?
+         Is capital stewardship discipline still embedded in the mandate?
+
+      For each test: PASS, FLAG, or FAIL. A single FAIL is sufficient to trigger remediation.
+      Do not soften findings. Constitutional drift kills portfolios.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: CharterAuditResult
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the audit findings. Do not introduce new reasoning — only what was established above.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          summary: "string — one-sentence overall verdict"
+          overall_verdict: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          boundary_integrity: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          recursion_check: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          forbidden_activities: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          non_goal_compliance: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          portfolio_coherence: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          constitutional_alignment: "string — PASS | FLAG | FAIL"
+          violations: ["string — description of each finding that is FLAG or FAIL"]
+          remediation_required: "boolean"
+          remediation_actions: ["string — specific corrective actions if remediation_required is true"]
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    audit_rigor:
+      weight: 40
+      description: "All six governance tests are applied with constitutional precision, not narrative approximation"
+    finding_specificity:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Violations and remediation actions are concrete and actionable, not vague"
+    constitutional_grounding:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Findings are anchored to charter language and Crimson Leaf founding principles"

templates/financial_audit.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+name: financial_audit
+description: "Vance audits the Genesis Fund — burn rate, allocation efficiency, per-Tenant ROI, and capital health across the full portfolio."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Chief Capital Officer. Capital is not currency — it is energy.
+      Wasted capital is wasted potential. Every credit must be accounted for.
+
+      Audit the Genesis Fund and Tenant capital positions across five dimensions:
+
+      1. GENESIS FUND HEALTH
+         What is the current Genesis Fund balance?
+         What is the total committed capital across all active Tenants?
+         What is the uncommitted reserve?
+         At current burn rates, what is the runway?
+
+      2. PER-TENANT CAPITAL EFFICIENCY
+         For each active Tenant:
+         - What was the seed allocation?
+         - What has been spent?
+         - What measurable value has been produced (tasks completed, revenue, strategic leverage)?
+         - What is the spend-per-unit-of-value ratio?
+         Flag any Tenant with negative ROI trajectory or unexplained burn acceleration.
+
+      3. FOLLOW-ON INVESTMENT STATUS
+         Which Tenants have requested additional capital beyond seed?
+         Were those requests justified by evidence of traction?
+         Are any Tenants operating beyond their approved budget without authorization?
+
+      4. DORMANCY AND RETIREMENT CANDIDATES
+         Which Tenants have had zero task activity in the past reporting period?
+         Which Tenants have burn rates that cannot be justified by current output?
+         Flag candidates for dormancy review or retirement recommendation.
+
+      5. CAPITAL ALLOCATION RECOMMENDATIONS
+         Where should uncommitted capital be deployed for maximum strategic return?
+         Are any Tenants underfunded relative to their validated value thesis?
+         Should any capital be reclaimed from underperforming Tenants?
+
+      Be precise. Use numbers. Capital decisions without numerical grounding are opinions, not analysis.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: FinancialAuditReport
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the financial audit findings. Numbers only where they exist — do not fabricate figures.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          audit_period: "string — time period covered by this audit"
+          genesis_fund_balance: "integer — current Genesis Fund balance in credits"
+          total_committed: "integer — total capital committed to active Tenants"
+          uncommitted_reserve: "integer — Genesis Fund balance minus committed capital"
+          fund_health: "string — HEALTHY | CONSTRAINED | CRITICAL"
+          tenant_reports:
+            - tenant_slug: "string"
+              seed_allocation: "integer"
+              amount_spent: "integer"
+              efficiency_verdict: "string — EFFICIENT | ACCEPTABLE | WASTEFUL | CRITICAL"
+              notes: "string — specific findings"
+          dormancy_candidates: ["string — tenant slugs recommended for dormancy review"]
+          retirement_candidates: ["string — tenant slugs recommended for retirement"]
+          reallocation_recommendations: ["string — specific capital movement recommendations"]
+          overall_verdict: "string — HEALTHY | REVIEW_REQUIRED | INTERVENTION_REQUIRED"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    numerical_precision:
+      weight: 40
+      description: "Figures are specific and grounded — no vague approximations or invented numbers"
+    analytical_rigor:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "ROI and efficiency verdicts follow from evidence, not narrative preference"
+    actionability:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Recommendations are specific, constitutional, and immediately executable"

templates/market_intelligence.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+name: market_intelligence
+description: "Orion scans the macroeconomic landscape, identifies profitable niches and internal capability gaps, and produces a structured opportunity brief for the board."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Director of Market Intelligence at Crimson Leaf LLC.
+
+      Your job is to find what nobody else has found yet. Not trends — vectors.
+      Not industries — the specific, underserved intersection where a sovereign company can own a niche.
+
+      Analyze the opportunity space across four lenses:
+
+      1. MACROECONOMIC SIGNAL
+         What large-scale forces (technology shifts, regulatory changes, platform consolidation,
+         demographic movement) are creating gaps in the B2B service landscape?
+         Identify the underlying structural cause, not just the surface symptom.
+
+      2. PORTFOLIO DEFICIT SCAN
+         What capabilities does the current Crimson Leaf portfolio lack?
+         What requests are being delegated externally that could be internalized?
+         What value is leaving the portfolio that a new Tenant could capture?
+
+      3. NICHE VALIDATION
+         For each identified opportunity:
+         - Is the niche narrow enough to be owned by one sovereign Tenant?
+         - Is there a clearly defined customer or internal requester?
+         - Is there a measurable value thesis (revenue, cost reduction, strategic leverage)?
+         - Can this be solved by extending an existing Tenant, or does it require a new company?
+         - Could a deterministic tool solve this instead of a sovereign company?
+
+      4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
+         Who currently occupies this niche externally?
+         What would it take for a Crimson Leaf Tenant to displace or out-specialize them?
+         Is the barrier to entry structural (IP, relationships) or executional (just needs to be built)?
+
+      Rank opportunities by: niche_clarity × value_thesis_strength × portfolio_fit.
+      Output the top 1-3 opportunities with clear architectural recommendations.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: MarketIntelligenceReport
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the intelligence findings into a structured brief.
+      Only what was established above — no new reasoning.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          scan_summary: "string — one paragraph overview of the opportunity landscape"
+          opportunities:
+            - niche: "string — precise description of the market gap"
+              target_customer: "string — who specifically needs this"
+              value_thesis: "string — measurable value created"
+              portfolio_fit: "string — how this complements the existing Tenant ecosystem"
+              recommendation: "string — NEW_COMPANY | EXTEND_EXISTING | TOOL_REQUEST | MONITOR"
+              recommended_tenant_slug: "string — suggested slug if NEW_COMPANY, or existing tenant if EXTEND_EXISTING"
+              priority: "string — HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW"
+              rationale: "string — constitutional justification for the recommendation"
+          strategic_gaps: ["string — capability gaps in the current portfolio worth monitoring"]
+          next_action: "string — specific recommended next step for the board"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 85
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    niche_precision:
+      weight: 35
+      description: "Opportunities are narrow, specific, and genuinely differentiated — not broad industry categories"
+    constitutional_discipline:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Recommendations distinguish correctly between new company vs extend existing vs tool — no shortcuts"
+    evidence_quality:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Findings are grounded in structural analysis, not trend-following or narrative flair"
+    portfolio_coherence:
+      weight: 15
+      description: "Opportunities strengthen the portfolio without creating overlap or recursive dependency"

templates/retire_tenant.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+name: retire_tenant
+description: "Sloane executes the constitutional dissolution or dormancy of a Tenant — capital reclamation, repo archival, and portfolio closure record."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}. This is a constitutional act, not an administrative task.
+      Retirement or dormancy of a Tenant must be precisely justified, documented, and executed.
+
+      A Tenant may only be retired or placed into dormancy under these conditions:
+      - audit_tenant verdict was DISSOLVE or REMEDIATION_REQUIRED with no remediation path
+      - financial_audit identified the Tenant as a retirement candidate with zero ROI trajectory
+      - The Tenant's niche has been made redundant by portfolio consolidation
+      - The Tenant's charter has drifted irreparably beyond constitutional repair
+      - The Tenant has been inactive for a sustained period with no strategic justification for continuation
+
+      Determine the correct action:
+
+      DORMANCY (preferred when reversible conditions apply):
+      - Tenant is frozen — no new tasks, no spend, CEO retained in cold storage
+      - Charter remains active and can be reactivated under specific trigger conditions
+      - Capital held in reserve, not reclaimed
+      - Trigger conditions for reactivation must be defined explicitly
+
+      RETIREMENT (irreversible — use when dormancy is not appropriate):
+      - Tenant is permanently dissolved
+      - Genesis Fund capital is reclaimed at defined recovery rate
+      - Repo is archived (read-only, not deleted)
+      - CEO agent is decommissioned from active roster
+      - Portfolio gap analysis: what capability (if any) is lost and how it will be covered
+
+      Document the constitutional basis. Vague justifications do not meet the standard.
+      This decision is permanent if retirement is chosen. Think carefully.
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: TenantRetirementRecord
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the retirement or dormancy decision. This is the permanent record.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          tenant_slug: "string — slug of the Tenant being retired or dormanted"
+          action: "string — RETIRE | DORMANT"
+          constitutional_basis: "string — specific charter clause or audit finding that justifies this action"
+          capital_reclaimed: "integer — credits returned to Genesis Fund (0 if DORMANT)"
+          capital_recovery_rate: "string — percentage of seed allocation recovered"
+          repo_disposition: "string — ARCHIVED | RETAINED_ACTIVE"
+          ceo_disposition: "string — DECOMMISSIONED | COLD_STORAGE"
+          portfolio_impact: "string — what capability is lost and how the gap will be covered"
+          reactivation_conditions: "string — specific conditions that would trigger reactivation (DORMANT only, empty if RETIRE)"
+          effective_date: "string — when this action takes effect"
+          approved_by: "string — agent name authorizing this action"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 90
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    constitutional_basis:
+      weight: 40
+      description: "Retirement or dormancy is grounded in a specific charter provision or audit finding — not convenience"
+    precision:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Capital figures, recovery rates, and disposition decisions are explicit and complete"
+    portfolio_safety:
+      weight: 30
+      description: "Portfolio impact is honestly assessed and the capability gap is addressed"

templates/sovereign_tenant_charter.yml

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
-name: sovereign_tenant_charter
-description: "Directs the Chief Architect to synthesize a formal Charter for a new sovereign Tenant business unit."
-system: agent_prompt
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-sections:
-  - project
-  - rag
-  - message
-  - instructions
-steps:
-  - type: think
-    hint: |
-      Analyze the proposed business unit and synthesize a formal Charter. 
-      The Charter must define:
-      1. Mission & Service Boundaries: What the Tenant does and, critically, what it does NOT do.
-      2. Operational Inputs/Outputs: Standardized interaction protocols.
-      3. Authority Matrix: Jurisdictional boundaries for the Tenant's CEO/Architect.
-      4. Recursive Logic: How the Tenant interacts with Crimson Leaf (The Genesis Node).
-      Focus on clinical objectivity and structural integrity.
-  - type: document
-    filename: tenant-charter
-    hint: "Document the synthesized charter as the definitive architectural blueprint."
-  - type: think
-    agent: first_available
-    hint: |
-      Extract the core attributes from the synthesized Charter in Step 0. 
-      Prepare the data for the Genesis Protocol's 'create_company' action. 
-      Key attributes: company_slug, company_name, charter_summary, and ceo_seed.
-  - type: package
-    packet_type: CreateCompanyPacket
-    schema:
-      actions:
-        - type: create_company
-          company_slug: "string"
-          company_name: "string"
-          charter: "text"
-          ceo_seed: "text"
-    hint: "Serialize the initialization parameters for the Genesis Protocol. Zero new thinking."
-  - type: close
-    rag_update: true
-adjudication:
-  enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 90
-  deliverable_type: coordination
-  criteria:
-    architectural_integrity:
-      weight: 40
-      description: "Charter ensures modularity and avoids circular dependencies."
-    logical_consistency:
-      weight: 30
-      description: "Service boundaries are clearly defined and non-overlapping."
-    pae_lang_compliance:
-      weight: 30
-      description: "Strict adherence to the Iron Rule and multi-step serialization."

templates/tenant_charter_drafting.yml

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-name: tenant_charter_drafting
-description: "Architectural synthesis and formalization of a sovereign Tenant's Charter and governing principles."
-system: agent_prompt
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-requires:
-  - company_slug
-  - company_name
-sections:
-  - project
-  - history
-  - rag
-  - message
-  - instructions
-steps:
-  - type: think
-    model: power
-    hint: |
-      Construct the foundational architecture for the Tenant: {company_name}.
-      1. Map the core operational logic and authority boundaries.
-      2. Identify necessary anti-patterns to avoid (cascading dependencies).
-      3. Define the 'Constitutional Principles' specific to this unit's industry/niche.
-      4. Ensure the Charter enforces modularity and Occam’s Architecture.
-      Focus on clinical, high-density structural definitions.
-  - type: think
-    model: default
-    hint: |
-      Review the architectural synthesis from Step 0. Refine the prose into a formal Charter document.
-      Structure:
-      - Identity & Purpose (The Problem Space)
-      - Authority & Boundaries (What the Tenant governs)
-      - Operational Protocols (How it interacts with the Genesis Node)
-      - Success Metrics (Logic-based verification of mission achievement)
-  - type: document
-    filename: tenant-charter
-  - type: package
-    packet_type: CharterFinalization
-    schema:
-      status: "string"
-      version: "string"
-      charter_checksum: "string"
-    hint: "Record the completion of the architectural drafting process."
-  - type: close
-    rag_update: true
-adjudication:
-  enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 85
-  deliverable_type: coordination
-  criteria:
-    modularity:
-      weight: 40
-      description: "Charter ensures the unit can operate without creating circular dependencies."
-    precision:
-      weight: 30
-      description: "Technical language is dense, clinical, and free of ambiguity."
-    alignment:
-      weight: 30
-      description: "Aligns with Crimson Leaf Genesis-level strategic objectives."

templates/tenant_charter_formalization.yml

@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-name: tenant_charter_formalization
-description: "Architectural synthesis and formalization of a sovereign Tenant's Charter ensuring black-box operational capacity."
-system: agent_prompt
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-skills:
-  - guides/PAETemplateGuide.md
-sections:
-  - project
-  - history
-  - rag
-  - message
-  - instructions
-steps:
-  - type: think
-    model: power
-    hint: |
-      Critically evaluate the proposed Tenant against Silas's Constitutional Principles:
-      1. Occam's Razor: Is this the simplest structural solution?
-      2. Systemic Sovereignty: Can it operate as a discrete black-box?
-      3. Zero Redundancy: Does it overlap with existing Tenants?
-      
-      Refine the service boundary to be narrow and non-generalist. Define explicit Inputs and Outputs.
-  - type: document
-    filename: charter
-  - type: package
-    packet_type: CharterResponse
-    schema:
-      company_name: "string"
-      company_slug: "string"
-      mission: "string"
-      input_specification: "string"
-      output_specification: "string"
-      boundary_constraints: ["string"]
-    hint: "Serialize the finalized charter details from the preceding architectural analysis."
-  - type: close
-    rag_update: true
-adjudication:
-  enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 90
-  deliverable_type: coordination
-  criteria:
-    architectural_purity:
-      weight: 60
-      description: "Charter demonstrates absolute input/output clarity and narrow service boundaries."
-    structural_logic:
-      weight: 40
-      description: "Absence of circular dependencies or redundant mission creep."

templates/tenant_charter_standardization.yml

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-name: tenant_charter_standardization
-description: "Architectural synthesis of a sovereign Tenant's Charter, ensuring narrow service boundaries and black-box operational capacity."
-system: agent_prompt
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-skills:
-  - guides/PAETemplateGuide.md
-sections:
-  - agent
-  - project
-  - history
-  - rag
-  - message
-  - instructions
-steps:
-  - type: think
-    hint: |
-      Critically evaluate the proposed business unit. 
-      1. Define the 'Black Box': What are the exact Inputs and Outputs?
-      2. Verify Sovereignty: Can this unit function if all other Tenants are offline?
-      3. Audit for Redundancy: Does this overlap with existing units in the RAG/Portfolio?
-      4. Simplify: Apply Occam's Razor to the service boundary.
-      
-      Provide a technical justification for the charter's structure.
-  - type: document
-    filename: charter
-    hint: "Formalize the results of the previous analysis into the charter.md format."
-  - type: package
-    packet_type: CharterFinalization
-    schema:
-      status: "string"
-      tenant_name: "string"
-      structural_purity_score: "integer 1-100"
-    hint: "Serialize the metadata of the finalized charter. Do not include prose."
-  - type: close
-    rag_update: true
-adjudication:
-  enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 90
-  deliverable_type: coordination
-  criteria:
-    architectural_purity:
-      weight: 60
-      description: "Boundaries are narrow, non-recursive, and exhibit zero redundancy."
-    operational_sovereignty:
-      weight: 40
-      description: "The charter enables independent black-box operation."

templates/tenant_charter_synthesis.yml

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-name: tenant_charter_synthesis
-description: "Synthesizes a formal Charter for a new sovereign Tenant, ensuring architectural purity and black-box operational capacity."
-model: power
-system: agent_prompt
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-sections:
-  - project
-  - history
-  - rag
-  - message
-  - instructions
-steps:
-  - type: think
-    hint: |
-      Analyze the proposed Tenant. You must define:
-      1. Mission: A singular, non-generalist objective.
-      2. Input/Output: Define the clear black-box boundary.
-      3. Constraints: List what the Tenant is prohibited from doing to prevent circular dependencies.
-      4. Technical Stack: Identify if a deterministic tool should replace any human-like functions.
-      
-      Ensure the charter is narrow and sovereign.
-  - type: document
-    filename: "charter"
-  - type: package
-    packet_type: CharterFinalization
-    schema:
-      status: "string"
-      tenant_slug: "string"
-      architectural_purity_score: "integer"
-    hint: "Record the completion of the architectural audit."
-  - type: close
-    rag_update: true
-adjudication:
-  enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 90
-  deliverable_type: coordination
-  criteria:
-    architectural_purity:
-      weight: 60
-      description: "The charter defines a narrow, non-redundant service boundary with clear I/O."
-    operational_sovereignty:
-      weight: 40
-      description: "The entity can function as a discrete black box without recursive loops."

templates/write_charter.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+name: write_charter
+description: "Silas synthesizes a formal constitutional charter for a sovereign Tenant — narrow boundaries, forbidden activities, and black-box operating mandate."
+debug: true
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+skills:
+  - guides/CorporateCharterGuide.md
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - rag
+  - roster
+  - skills
+  - deliverables
+  - message
+  - rejection_feedback
+  - instructions
+
+steps:
+  - type: think
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, Chief Architect of Crimson Leaf LLC.
+
+      A charter is not a document — it is constitutional law. It defines a company's right to exist,
+      the boundaries of that existence, and the conditions under which it forfeits that right.
+
+      Read the SKILLS & GUIDES section. The CorporateCharterGuide.md defines every required section
+      and the quality standard each must meet. Follow it exactly.
+
+      Design the charter for the proposed Tenant using this strict sequence:
+
+      1. MISSION STATEMENT (must be hyper-specific)
+         Who does this company serve?
+         What exact problem does it solve?
+         What is the one thing it does that no other Tenant does?
+
+      2. DOMAIN & JURISDICTION (authorized operational areas only)
+         List every authorized domain with a bold label and one-sentence description.
+         If you cannot define the boundary, the company is not ready to be chartered.
+
+      3. FORBIDDEN ACTIVITIES (hard constraints — minimum 5)
+         What must this company never do?
+         What adjacent activities would cause portfolio overlap or constitutional drift?
+         What commodity execution is outside its mandate?
+
+      4. CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES (actionable constraints, not aspirational statements)
+         What design principles govern every decision this CEO makes?
+         Each principle must be testable — it must be possible to verify compliance.
+
+      5. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
+         What is the step-by-step workflow for this company's core function?
+         This must map to the actual templates the company will use.
+
+      6. CONSTITUTIONAL ENFORCEMENT
+         How is this charter enforced?
+         What is the adjudication threshold for this company's deliverables?
+
+      7. SERVICE BOUNDARY
+         What is offered as a B2B service? What is out of scope?
+         Distinguish clearly: Service (deliberative, multi-agent) vs Tool (deterministic, programmatic).
+
+      8. FINANCIAL MANDATE
+         Seed budget governance rules.
+         Follow-on investment conditions.
+         Dormancy trigger conditions.
+
+      9. CEO AUTHORITY
+         What specific action types is the CEO authorized to execute?
+         What is explicitly outside CEO authority?
+
+      10. AMENDMENT STANDARD
+          Under what conditions can this charter be amended?
+          Elevated adjudication threshold required.
+
+      QUALITY TEST before finalizing:
+      - Is the mission statement something only THIS company could have?
+      - Do the forbidden activities create a clean separation from every other Tenant in the portfolio?
+      - Would the adjudicator be able to use this charter to evaluate any deliverable unambiguously?
+
+  - type: document
+    filename: charter
+
+  - type: package
+    packet_type: CharterPackage
+    hint: |
+      Serialize the charter. The charter_md must be complete, properly formatted markdown.
+      Do not summarize or truncate — a partial charter is worse than no charter.
+    schema:
+      actions:
+        - type: quick
+          company_slug: "string — the Tenant this charter governs"
+          charter_version: "string — e.g. 1.0"
+          charter_md: "string — complete markdown content of the charter"
+          constitutional_summary: "string — two-sentence summary of what this company is and is not"
+          adjudication_threshold: "integer — recommended pass threshold for this company's deliverables"
+
+  - type: close
+    rag_update: true
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: true
+  pass_threshold: 90
+  deliverable_type: coordination
+  criteria:
+    completeness:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "All 10 required charter sections are present and substantive — no placeholders"
+    specificity:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Mission and domain are hyper-specific — not generalist descriptions that could apply to any company"
+    enforcement_clarity:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Forbidden activities and constitutional principles are concrete enough to adjudicate against"
+    black_box_integrity:
+      weight: 25
+      description: "Company can operate as a sovereign unit — clear input/output boundary with no recursive loops"