research: affiliate brief task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
I appreciate the detailed context, but I need to flag a **critical structural issue** before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Problem
|
||||
|
||||
I am listed as **"affiliate_intelligence"** in the chair designation, but according to the Crimson Leaf charter and RAG context:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **No such agent exists in the current roster.** The documented Crimson Leaf internal roster is: Lyra (Intake), Edgar (Architect/CEO), Sterling (Governance), plus a Founding CEO seat — totaling 4/8 agents.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **This violates the charter's prohibition on undefined roles.** Section 3 ("Forbidden Activities") explicitly forbids Crimson Leaf from operating as a service provider. The charter is clear: Crimson Leaf does not execute deliverables (including market research or affiliate brief generation). Execution is delegated to sovereign Tenants with their own CEOs, charters, and budgets.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **The task request itself is a commodity execution task** — drafting a business brief for affiliate marketing — which the charter explicitly prohibits Crimson Leaf from performing (Section 3: "drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports").
|
||||
|
||||
4. **The data placeholders are empty** — {aff_data_1}, {aff_data_2}, {aff_data_3}, {aff_data_4} — so there is no actual research to synthesize.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What Should Happen Instead
|
||||
|
||||
**Option A: Tenant Creation**
|
||||
If Crimson Leaf's portfolio needs affiliate marketing intelligence as a distinct capability, the proper path is:
|
||||
1. Draft a **Tenant charter** for an "Affiliate Intelligence & Content Unit" with its own CEO, market focus, and budget.
|
||||
2. Route this through the Genesis Protocol (architectural audit → charter refinement → capital thesis → 95% adjudication threshold).
|
||||
3. Hire the founding CEO, provision the Tenant, and empower them to build the affiliate research practice.
|
||||
|
||||
**Option B: Deterministic Tool Delegation**
|
||||
If this is a one-off research request, Crimson Leaf should:
|
||||
1. Confirm the actual affiliate niche in question.
|
||||
2. Delegate to existing web scraping, SEO, and keyword research tools (SEMrush, Ahrefs, Google Keyword Planner, etc.).
|
||||
3. Synthesize results in a brief, but not as a governance artifact—as a routing document to a future Tenant or external service.
|
||||
|
||||
**Option C: Clarify the Operator's Intent**
|
||||
Is this a test of constitutional enforcement? A genuine request to scope a new Tenant? Or misrouting of a task intended for a different system?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## My Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Do not proceed with affiliate brief generation under the "affiliate_intelligence" chair.**
|
||||
|
||||
Instead, clarify:
|
||||
1. Does Crimson Leaf need a dedicated Affiliate Intelligence Tenant?
|
||||
2. Or is this research input for a different decision (e.g., scoping a future Indie Author Affiliate Tenant)?
|
||||
3. What is the actual niche being researched?
|
||||
|
||||
I'm ready to support either path—but only within constitutional boundaries.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user