fix: repair corrupted index/log files, fix company_proposal template bugs

- index.md: rebuild with full rejection history and CLO spec
- latest.md: replace garbage with correct cycle state entry
- company_proposal.yml: fix step 1 to output single query (not 3-line text)
  so WebSearcher receives a clean search query instead of multi-line input
- company_proposal.yml: add output_key: index_update to index think step
  so document step source_step: index_update resolves correctly
- strategic_review.yml: add source_step: log_entry to document step
  to be explicit rather than relying on implicit last-step behavior
- research_brief.yml: fix source_step 8->9 (carry forward from prior session)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Baity
2026-04-29 11:32:36 -04:00
parent 16aa204fbf
commit 4294018d58
5 changed files with 90 additions and 59 deletions

View File

@@ -1,29 +1,22 @@
# SYSTEM ALERT
## Cycle Entry: Manual Reset (2026-04-29)
**No agent 'strategic_review' found** — agent_not_found: no agent named or with role 'strategic_review' in company 'crimson_leaf'
### Board Consensus
All prior proposals proposed the wrong company (DTC storefronts or incubation systems).
The ONLY authorized next proposal is CLO (Crimson Leaf Operations) -- internal financial
visibility tooling. Do NOT propose anything else until CLO is approved.
---
### Gap Status
GAP 1 (CLO): READY TO PROPOSE -- CLO proposal is overdue. 25+ wrong proposals submitted.
Next proposal MUST be for crimson_leaf_operations (internal ops/cost tracking).
Read deliverables/proposals/index.md -- it contains full rejection history and spec.
GAP 2 (CLR): DEFERRED -- not yet urgent.
GAP 3 (KDP): DEFERRED -- needs CLO first for cost tracking.
## Resolution Required
### Proposal Decision
NONE: No CLO proposal submitted yet this cycle. Awaiting next strategic_review to submit.
The chair role `strategic_review` does not exist in the Crimson Leaf roster.
### CLM Dispatch
NONE
**Current Crimson Leaf roster:**
- Edgar (Founding CEO / Architect)
- Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
- Sterling (Director of Talent & Governance)
**Possible actions:**
1. **Route to Edgar** — Request strategic review summary from the Founding CEO as the operational authority
2. **Route to Lyra** — Request intake log summary from the Intake Coordinator
3. **Create the agent** — Hire a dedicated strategic review agent (e.g., "Chief Intelligence Officer") if governance scope warrants it (would consume 1 of 8 roster slots)
4. **Cancel** — Defer the strategic review cycle entry
**Recommendation:** Route to **Edgar** (Founding CEO) as the minimal viable strategic authority until a dedicated Chief Intelligence Officer is hired to operationalize strategic review workflows.
---
**Please clarify:**
- Should this entry be generated by Edgar instead?
- Should a new `Chief Intelligence Officer` agent be hired to own strategic reviews?
- Or should this cycle be deferred?
### Next Focus
Submit a correct CLO (Crimson Leaf Operations) proposal with real web research and citations.