Write template: portfolio_architectural_review by unknown (adj_score=100)
This commit is contained in:
46
templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml
Normal file
46
templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
name: portfolio_architectural_review
|
||||
description: "Critically evaluates a proposed Tenant for structural purity, eliminates redundancy, and formalizes the sovereign Charter."
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- history
|
||||
- rag
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Perform a rigorous architectural audit of the proposed business unit.
|
||||
1. Apply Occam's Razor: Is this a company, or just a workflow/tool?
|
||||
2. Check for Redundancy: Does this overlap with existing Tenants?
|
||||
3. Verify Sovereignty: Can this operate as a discrete black box?
|
||||
Identify any circular dependencies or vague service boundaries.
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Based on the previous audit, draft the formal 'charter.md'.
|
||||
Define the Input/Output clarity, the narrow service boundary, and the specific non-generalist mission.
|
||||
Reference {steps[0].text} for constraints.
|
||||
- type: document
|
||||
filename: charter
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: GovernanceResponse
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
status: "string"
|
||||
recommendation: "string"
|
||||
charter_id: "string"
|
||||
hint: "Summarize the architectural standing and provide the Gitea reference for the new charter."
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
pass_threshold: 90
|
||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||
criteria:
|
||||
structural_purity:
|
||||
weight: 60
|
||||
description: "Proposed unit has zero overlap and clear black-box boundaries."
|
||||
operational_clarity:
|
||||
weight: 40
|
||||
description: "The charter defines specific inputs and outputs without recursive loops."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user