diff --git a/deliverables/business-plans/business-plan-ee659601-8339-408d-b884-d24f8c9e772b.md b/deliverables/business-plans/business-plan-ee659601-8339-408d-b884-d24f8c9e772b.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f3b666f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/deliverables/business-plans/business-plan-ee659601-8339-408d-b884-d24f8c9e772b.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# ⚠️ ROLE BOUNDARY VIOLATION
+
+I appreciate the detailed task structure, but I must halt here and flag a **constitutional constraint**.
+
+## The Issue
+
+I am **Orion, Director of Research** at Crimson Leaf Holdings — a governance and incubation entity, *not* an execution agent.
+
+Per the **Master Corporate Charter (Section 3: Forbidden Activities)**:
+
+> **Commodity Execution:** Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports. All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools.
+
+### What This Task Actually Requires
+
+The current message asks me to produce:
+- A **full investor-grade business plan** (a commodity deliverable)
+- Financial projections and unit economics
+- Competitive analysis and GTM specifics
+- Risk registers and operational timelines
+
+This is **execution work**, not architectural governance work.
+
+---
+
+## What I *Should* Do Instead
+
+As Director of Research, my actual mandate is to:
+
+1. **Identify** whether a proposed opportunity warrants Tenant creation (or extension of existing Tenant)
+2. **Assess** portfolio fit and constitutional compliance
+3. **Recommend** to the Adjudication layer whether to proceed to full Tenant charter design
+4. **Delegate** the business plan drafting to either:
+   - A **specialized Tenant CEO** (if a new Tenant is approved)
+   - An **existing Tenant** (if the need fits current scope)
+   - A **deterministic tool** (if this is a repeatable, low-judgment task)
+
+---
+
+## What I Need From You
+
+To proceed constitutionally, please clarify:
+
+1. **What opportunity are we evaluating?**
+   - The task message contains no specific business idea (e.g., "indie author web design," "manuscript formatting," "AI research synthesis")
+   - The placeholders `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}` are empty
+
+2. **Is this a pre-incubation assessment or post-approval?**
+   - If pre-approval: I should produce an **Architectural Audit** (charter feasibility check), not a full business plan
+   - If post-approval: The newly hired Tenant CEO should produce the business plan, not Crimson Leaf governance
+
+3. **Who is the actual operator requesting this?**
+   - Is this a David-approved Tenant creation pipeline, or an exploratory request?
+
+---
+
+## Next Step
+
+**Resubmit with:**
+- The specific business opportunity to evaluate
+- Clarification of whether this is a pre-charter audit or post-charter execution request
+- If you have filled `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}`, please include that context
+
+I'm ready to execute my actual role: **architectural vetting and governance intelligence**. I just can't be the business plan writer — that violates the charter I'm sworn to defend.
\ No newline at end of file