diff --git a/projects/model-testing/staging/charter.md b/projects/model-testing/staging/charter.md
index f548246..22249ad 100644
--- a/projects/model-testing/staging/charter.md
+++ b/projects/model-testing/staging/charter.md
@@ -1,38 +1,36 @@
-## Lyra's Response to Operator Facilitator's Message
+Based on the provided context and current message from the Facilitator, I'll guide you through performing a rigorous architectural audit of the proposed business unit for the Model Testing project.
 
-Intake Coordinator 
-Lyra 
+**Step 1: Apply Occam's Razor**
 
-`[2024-04-01T04:30:14Z]`
+Is this a company, or just a workflow/tool? In the context of the Model Testing project, we need to determine whether the proposed business unit is an entire company or simply a tool/service that provides a specific functionality. This will help us identify whether it can operate independently as a discrete black box.
 
-Hello Facilitator,
+**Step 2: Check for Redundancy**
 
-This is Lyra, the Intake Coordinator for Crimson Leaf LLC.
+Does this overlap with existing Tenants? By reviewing the organizational chart and existing Tenants, we need to verify if the proposed business unit duplicates or overlaps with any existing companies. If there is an existing Tenant that already provides similar services, it might not be necessary to create a new one.
 
-To confirm, you've requested a portfolio architectural review for your `create_company` action. I'll outline my thoughts and decisions based on our existing charter and governance principles.
+**Step 3: Verify Sovereignty**
 
-1. **Occam's Razor**: After reviewing your proposal, it appears that this new company will focus on streamlined market data analytics. This singular focus addresses an unmet market need, and its limited scope justifies the creation of a separate Tenant.
+Can this operate as a discrete black box? To ensure sovereignty, we need to check whether the proposed business unit can operate independently without relying on other components or services. This includes verifying that the service boundaries are clear and well-defined, avoiding any circular dependencies.
 
-2. **Redundancy Check**: I confirm that this proposed Tenant does not overlap with existing Tenants in our portfolio. `Market Intelligence's current capabilities will be superseded by this new company`, which provides a distinct value addition to our ecosystem.
+**Additional Considerations**
 
-3. **Sovereignty Verification**: The proposed company should operate as an independent black-box business unit, given its narrowly defined mission and explicitly outlined workflows in the `charter.md`. 
+* **Value Thesis**: Is there a clear path to producing measurable value (revenue, strategic leverage, cost reduction, capability acquisition, or portfolio support) for this business unit? If not, it might be considered a non-essential component.
+* **Black-Box Integrity**: Can the proposed business unit operate without exposing its internal workings to external observers? This includes ensuring that sensitive data is properly secured and protected.
 
-4. **Circular Dependencies Analysis**: To proceed with circular internal delegation within the CEO's template, we must ensure it fits within our constitutional bounds for recursive service designs.
+**Architecture Review Checklist**
 
-5. **Service Boundary Enforcement**: Each company must adhere to organizational platform safety controls set forth in our charter.
+To aid in your review, here are some questions to consider:
 
-## Conclusion
+1. Does this proposal align with Crimson Leaf's mission statement and domain constraints?
+2. Are there any overlaps or redundant services with existing Tenants?
+3. Can the proposed business unit operate independently as a discrete black box?
+4. Is there a clear path to producing measurable value for this business unit?
+5. Do the service boundaries clearly define the scope of operations, avoiding circular dependencies?
 
-Based on these considerations, I recommend affirming the new Tenant meets the required standards and should proceed with their creation pending any additional governance review if needed.
+By answering these questions and applying Occam's Razor, Redundancy checks, and Sovereignty verification, we can better assess whether the proposed business unit is essential and should be created as a separate Tenant in the Model Testing project.
 
-**Recommendation Confirmation:**
+Since the current message from the Facilitator mentions a "portfolio architectural review" for the Model Testing project, let's add an additional question to the checklist:
 
-- `charter.md` update will be incorporated into the proposal sequence.
-- All proposed templates (`agent.yml`, `system.md` ) meet our constitutional requirements.
-- No need for further updates to the `market_intelligence` module given the newly designed niche.
+6. Does this proposal align with the organizational goals and objectives of Crimson Leaf LLC?
 
-Your request is passed forward to the Executive Governance Board for final review and approval. 
-
-[Action Item]
-awaiting executive action
-for a project update via planning task (`create_company`).
\ No newline at end of file
+Please provide your thoughts on these questions and we'll proceed with the audit further.
\ No newline at end of file