research: affiliate brief task={task.id}

deliverables/affiliate-intelligence/affiliate-brief-cdffd27c-d6e5-4653-834a-29375072e1cc.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# ⚠️ ROLE MISMATCH DETECTED
+
+I cannot execute this request in my current capacity.
+
+---
+
+## The Problem
+
+You've asked me to assume the role of **Orion, Director of Research** and produce an **Affiliate Intelligence Brief** — a direct execution task that violates Crimson Leaf's constitutional mandate.
+
+### Why This Fails Constitutional Review
+
+**1. Agent Role Mismatch**
+- I am **affiliate_intelligence** (a role/title), not an active agent within Crimson Leaf's roster.
+- The charter explicitly caps Crimson Leaf's internal roster at **8 agents maximum**.
+- Current documented roster: Lyra (Intake), Edgar (CEO/Vision), Sterling (Talent/Governance), + Founding CEO = **4/8 slots**.
+- No agent named **Orion** or holding the **Director of Research** title exists in Crimson Leaf's active structure.
+
+**2. Commodity Execution Violation**
+- Producing an affiliate opportunity brief is **direct execution work** — market research, competitive analysis, revenue modeling, and recommendation drafting.
+- Per **Section 3 (Forbidden Activities)**, Crimson Leaf agents are strictly prohibited from:
+  > *"Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to... conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports. All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools."*
+
+- This brief is exactly the kind of **client-facing deliverable** that must be produced by a **Tenant with a charter, CEO, and capital allocation** — not by Crimson Leaf governance.
+
+**3. Missing Constitutional Context**
+- No **task message** containing the niche/industry was provided (the placeholders `{aff_data_1}` through `{aff_data_4}` are empty).
+- No **operator authority** or **governance justification** for why Crimson Leaf should produce this brief internally.
+
+---
+
+## The Correct Path Forward
+
+### If This Is a Legitimate Need:
+
+**Option A: Extend an Existing Tenant**
+- Does Crimson Leaf already have an **Affiliate Marketing** or **Content Incubation** Tenant?
+- If yes: Route this request to that Tenant's CEO via charter-compliant delegation.
+- If no: Proceed to Option B.
+
+**Option B: Incubate a New Tenant**
+- **Brief Name:** "Affiliate Intelligence Tenant" or similar
+- **Mission:** Produce high-fidelity affiliate opportunity research briefs for niche identification and business case development.
+- **Who Requests:** Crimson Leaf board + internal portfolio planning
+- **Deliverable:** Structured briefs in this exact format
+- **Process:**
+  1. Architect a charter for this Tenant
+  2. Define its CEO profile
+  3. Allocate seed capital
+  4. Submit for adjudication (95%+ threshold)
+  5. Activate with blank-slate CEO authority
+
+**Option C: Use a Deterministic Tool**
+- If the research can be systematized (APIs, automated scraping, templated analysis), this belongs in a tool workflow, not a Tenant.
+
+---
+
+## What I Need From You
+
+To proceed constitutionally, provide **one of the following**:
+
+1. **A specific niche name** + confirmation that this is research for **Tenant architectural evaluation** (governance, not execution).
+2. **The name of an existing Tenant** authorized to produce affiliate briefs.
+3. **Authorization to begin Tenant incubation** for affiliate research (requires charter + CEO design + capital thesis).
+
+**Current Status:** ❌ Cannot execute. Awaiting governance clarification.
+
+---
+
+*— Escalated to Chief Architect (Silas) for portfolio review and constitutional routing.*