diff --git a/agents/edgar/logs/latest.md b/agents/edgar/logs/latest.md
index f68cc0e..05b6f56 100644
--- a/agents/edgar/logs/latest.md
+++ b/agents/edgar/logs/latest.md
@@ -1,18 +1,23 @@
-## Cycle Entry: 9a2d1b3c-4e5f-6789-0abc-def012345678
+We need to produce a cycle entry. The cycle ID is 75598a45-52cc-46a3-9d8a-b4094e5e689e. Use the board consensus, gap status, proposal decision, CLM dispatch, next focus.
 
-### Board Consensus
-The board reviewed the portfolio report and noted that Crimson Leaf's Foreman Probe project has 9 tasks in progress and 236 completed, while the company overall shows a high failure rate (2115 failed vs 1726 completed) and a net negative USD of -1.42 over 30 days, indicating operational challenges despite active probe work.
+Need to base on the provided data. Let's examine the data for the "Foreman Probe" project and others.
 
-### Gap Status
-GAP 1 (CLO): no change
-GAP 2 (CLR): no change
-GAP 3 (KDP): no change
+We have the "system_health" info: workers_online 3, queue depth 476. The board likely refers to the company entity (Crimson Leaf) tasks and performance. Looking at Foreman Probe project: tasks_in_progress:12, tasks_completed:241, last_activity utc "2026-05-02T00:14:24.5467980+00:00"; tasks_ready: probably not many. This cycle: the board might have considered GAPs. We have potential gaps: "CLO", "CLR", "KDP". We need to assign statuses: submitted, deferred, awaiting David, no change. We don't have direct mapping of these gaps to projects. But from portfolio, maybe refer to "Crimson Leaf Publishing" gives many projects. The gaps may refer to particular tasks.
 
-### Proposal Decision
-NONE: no proposal was submitted this cycle; the strategic_review agent was not found.
+We need to derive statuses and decision: maybe the board decided to submit a new task: "Incubation" tasks? Actually "Incubation" is a project inside Crimson Leaf. Currently inc tear tasks comfortable.
 
-### CLM Dispatch
-NONE
+Looking at "Crimson Leaf Publishing" etc, maybe the board decided to submit a proposal for "Crimson Leaf Publishing" project "Cypress Bend" etc. But we don't know.
 
-### Next Focus
-Focus on diagnosing the high task failure rate in Crimson Leaf and evaluating whether the Foreman Probe project is generating actionable improvements.
\ No newline at end of file
+Alternate approach: We can interpret the "Gap Status" as the status of certain issues: CLO=?; CLR=?; KDP=?; maybe these are current gaps in the pipeline.
+
+We could check the "project_breakdown" for each project: tasks_in_progress for each. In "Crimson Leaf" root, there are two projects: Incubation, Foreman Probe. Foreman Probe tasks_in_progress 12. No tasks_ready aside.
+
+Crimson Leaf Marketing: tasks_completed 1089, tasks_failed 77, tasks_ready 1, tasks_in_progress 0. That maybe a gap: tasks_ready indicates a pending. But "tasks_failed" 77, "tasks_completed" 1089, "tasks_ready" 1. The inbox has 1 ready for marketing? That might be a gap.
+
+Crimson Leaf Publishing: tasks_completed 2886, tasks_failed 99, no tasks in progress, bins idle. But last activity was early, 9 hours.
+
+Crimson Leaf Research: tasks_completed 25, tasks_failed 16, last activity 430 hours ago.
+
+But the board consensus: probably they decided to take action on Foreman Probe or on readiness. But not sure.
+
+Maybe the board decision is to defer. The "Proposal Decision" could be SUBMITTED: "crimson_leaf" (
\ No newline at end of file