research: business plan task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
|||||||
|
# DIRECTOR ORION STATUS REPORT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I appreciate the detailed architectural brief, but I need to flag a **critical structural gap** before proceeding.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Problem
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You've asked me to produce an investor-grade business plan for an "Incubation" opportunity, but:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **No specific opportunity has been defined.** The task message is empty. I have:
|
||||||
|
- A charter (governance framework ✓)
|
||||||
|
- Market research data placeholders (`{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}`) — **all empty**
|
||||||
|
- A template format ✓
|
||||||
|
- But **zero substantive opportunity to analyze**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **The research data is not populated.** The document references:
|
||||||
|
- Business model examples — *missing*
|
||||||
|
- Go-to-market channel research — *missing*
|
||||||
|
- Risk and failure research — *missing*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **I cannot invent a market opportunity.** Doing so would violate Crimson Leaf's charter on "Commodity Execution" and "Generalist Incubation." This is exactly the kind of architectural drift the charter forbids.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What I Need to Proceed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To deliver a **real, actionable business plan**, you must provide:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option A: Specify a Concrete Opportunity
|
||||||
|
- **What market gap or customer need are we solving?**
|
||||||
|
- (Example: "AI-powered email personalization for indie SaaS founders" or "Manuscript formatting-as-a-service for self-publishing")
|
||||||
|
- **Who is the customer?** (TAM, geography, segment)
|
||||||
|
- **Why now?** (What changed in the market?)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option B: Populate the Research Data
|
||||||
|
- Attach or paste the actual market research files:
|
||||||
|
- `biz_data_1` (business model examples / comparable ventures)
|
||||||
|
- `biz_data_2` (GTM channel benchmarks, conversion rates, CAC data)
|
||||||
|
- `biz_data_3` (failure modes, competitive risks)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option C: Delegate to the Intake Coordinator
|
||||||
|
If this is exploratory work, I should route this through **Lyra** (Intake Coordinator) to properly scope the research need, rather than me fabricating a business plan.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## My Recommendation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**This request is currently underspecified.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Per Crimson Leaf's Genesis Protocol, I should:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Clarify the actual opportunity** (what problem, customer, market?)
|
||||||
|
2. **Gather the source research** before drafting projections
|
||||||
|
3. **Route this through architectural intake** to ensure the opportunity passes the "Need Assessment" gate before I invest planning effort
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**What would you like me to do?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- A) You provide the specific opportunity + research data → I deliver the full business plan
|
||||||
|
- B) You want me to route this through Lyra first for proper scoping → I'll prepare an intake briefing
|
||||||
|
- C) Something else I'm missing in the context above?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Standing by for clarification.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*— Orion, Director of Research*
|
||||||
|
*Crimson Leaf Holdings*
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user