fix: strategic_review -- git_read_file loads mission+log, per-cycle log write-back

templates/strategic_review.yml

@@ -2,16 +2,6 @@ name: strategic_review
 description: "Crimson Leaf 24-hour strategic review -- mission assessment, portfolio evaluation, gap identification, and escalation."
 debug: true
 model: power
-system: agent_prompt
-
-agent_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-  - "= mission.md"
-  - "= strategic_log.md"
-
-participant_prompt:
-  - "= identity.md"
-
 sections:
   - agent
   - project
@@ -21,17 +11,36 @@ sections:
   - rag
   - message
   - instructions
-
 builders:
   message: |
     *** PORTFOLIO REPORT ***
     {steps[0].text}
-
 steps:
   - type: tool
     action: get_portfolio_report
     output_key: portfolio_data
 
+  - type: tool
+    action: git_read_file
+    params:
+      path: "agents/edgar/mission.md"
+    output_key: mission_data
+    optional: false
+
+  - type: tool
+    action: git_read_file
+    params:
+      path: "agents/edgar/strategic_log.md"
+    output_key: strategic_log_data
+    optional: true
+
+  - type: tool
+    action: git_read_file
+    params:
+      path: "agents/edgar/logs/latest.md"
+    output_key: latest_log_entry
+    optional: true
+
   - type: think
     max_tokens: 8000
     rotate_participants: true
@@ -41,13 +50,24 @@ steps:
       You are {agent.name}, participating in the Crimson Leaf Holdings strategic review.
       This is round {task.iteration} of the board session.
 
-      The portfolio report is above. Your mission charter and strategic log are in your system prompt.
+      The portfolio report is above.
+
+      === MISSION CHARTER ===
+      {mission_data}
+
+      === STRATEGIC LOG (Master) ===
+      {strategic_log_data}
+
+      === LAST CYCLE ENTRY ===
+      {latest_log_entry}
+      ===
+
       Analyze from YOUR perspective:
 
       - If you are Edgar (The Operator): Focus on systems health, metrics, gaps in capability.
         Are companies executing? Are we moving toward the mission success criteria?
         What gaps are blocking revenue? What should we PROPOSE to David?
-        Check the strategic_log: what proposals are already submitted and awaiting David?
+        Check the strategic_log and last cycle entry: what proposals are already submitted?
         Do NOT propose a company if it was already submitted in the last 30 days.
 
       - If you are Orion (The Visionary): Focus on opportunities and what we are missing.
@@ -82,10 +102,10 @@ steps:
       Keep it actionable. David is one person -- prioritize ruthlessly.
 
       PROPOSAL GATE ASSESSMENT:
-      Check the strategic_log.md in your context. Has CLO (or whichever gap-company)
+      Check the strategic_log and last cycle entry below. Has CLO (or whichever gap-company)
       been proposed in the last 30 days? If yes, state PROPOSAL_NEEDED: none.
       Only propose if: gap is materially blocking revenue AND cannot be solved by
-      existing resources AND no proposal for this company appears in strategic_log.md.
+      existing resources AND no proposal for this company appears in the log.
       State one of: PROPOSAL_NEEDED: [company-slug] or PROPOSAL_NEEDED: none
 
       MARKETING DISPATCH ASSESSMENT:
@@ -93,6 +113,12 @@ steps:
       At the end of your brief, include:
       CLM_DISPATCH: <book-project-slug if a completed book needs CLM campaign, or "none">
 
+      === STRATEGIC LOG ===
+      {strategic_log_data}
+
+      === LAST CYCLE ENTRY ===
+      {latest_log_entry}
+
   - type: think
     max_tokens: 100
     output_key: proposal_project_slug
@@ -173,50 +199,44 @@ steps:
       content: "{clm_dispatch_message}"
 
   - type: think
-    max_tokens: 3000
+    max_tokens: 600
-    output_key: updated_log
+    output_key: log_entry
     hint: |
-      Write the COMPLETE updated strategic_log.md for this review cycle.
+      Write a brief summary of THIS CYCLE'S strategic review to record in the log.
+      This entry will be loaded next cycle so Edgar remembers what was decided.
 
-      The current log content is in your system context (loaded from
+      Format:
-      agents/edgar/strategic_log.md at task start). Copy ALL existing entries
+      ## Cycle Entry: Task {task.id}
-      EXACTLY as they appear. Do NOT summarize, shorten, or alter them.
-
-      Then APPEND a new entry at the END using this exact format:
-
-      ---
-
-      ## Entry {task.created_at_date} (Task {task.id})
 
       ### Board Consensus
-      [One paragraph: what did the board agree on this cycle?]
+      [One sentence: what did the board agree on?]
 
-      ### Gap Status Updates
+      ### Gap Status
-      GAP 1 (CLO): [status -- submitted/deferred/awaiting David/no change]
+      GAP 1 (CLO): [submitted/deferred/awaiting David/no change -- ONE of these]
       GAP 2 (CLR): [status]
-      GAP 3 (KDP pipeline): [status]
+      GAP 3 (KDP): [status]
 
       ### Proposal Decision
       [ONE of:]
-      SUBMITTED: [company-slug] -- proposal task enqueued to incubation this cycle
+      SUBMITTED: [company-slug] -- task enqueued to incubation this cycle
-      DEFERRED: [reason, e.g. "CLO already submitted on YYYY-MM-DD, awaiting David"]
+      DEFERRED: [reason]
       NONE: [reason]
 
       ### CLM Dispatch
       [ONE of:]
-      DISPATCHED: [book-project-slug] -- marketing campaign task sent to CLM
+      DISPATCHED: [book-project-slug]
       NONE
 
-      ### Next Review Focus
+      ### Next Focus
-      [One sentence on what to watch for next cycle]
+      [One sentence]
 
-      OUTPUT: The COMPLETE file content starting from the very first line.
+      Keep it factual. Use only what happened in this cycle.
-      If the log exceeds 30 entries, compact the 10 oldest into an
+      Do NOT invent history. Do NOT summarize old entries.
-      "ARCHIVED SUMMARY" block at the top to keep the file manageable.
+      Output ONLY the entry text above.
 
   - type: document
-    dest_path: "agents/edgar/strategic_log.md"
+    dest_path: "agents/edgar/logs/latest.md"
-    commit_msg: "log: strategic review cycle"
+    commit_msg: "log: strategic review cycle {task.id}"
 
   - type: reply
     target: discussion