log: strategic review cycle {task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
|
|||||||
## Cycle Entry: Task e7f07f15-393e-405f-bad2-50addf9e145d
|
## Cycle Entry: Task e7f07f15-393e-405f-bad2-50addf9e145d
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Board Consensus
|
### Board Consensus
|
||||||
The board finalized the move from generalist "commodity content" toward a "proprietary technology layer" model, specifically targeting the structural gaps in independent publishing infrastructure.
|
The board rejected the AI-cookbook proposal as it violated the "Commodity Execution" prohibition and lacked a sovereign architectural thesis, opting instead to pivot toward high-fidelity author infrastructure.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Gap Status
|
### Gap Status
|
||||||
GAP 1 (CLO): awaiting David
|
GAP 1 (CLO): deferred
|
||||||
GAP 2 (CLR): no change
|
GAP 2 (CLR): no change
|
||||||
GAP 3 (KDP): submitted
|
GAP 3 (KDP): awaiting David
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Proposal Decision
|
### Proposal Decision
|
||||||
SUBMITTED: ink-and-anchor-digital -- Charter finalized to provide high-fidelity, conversion-centric storefront architecture for indie authors, fulfilling the requirement for non-deterministic aesthetic judgment.
|
NONE: Initial cookbook concept was dismissed due to architectural impurity; the pivot toward "Ink & Anchor Digital" (author web presence) is currently being refined for structural vetting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### CLM Dispatch
|
### CLM Dispatch
|
||||||
NONE
|
NONE
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Next Focus
|
### Next Focus
|
||||||
The board will pivot to vetting the legal and capital governance structure for the "Foreman Probe" to ensure robust seeding of the new Tenants.
|
Review the architectural audit for "Ink & Anchor Digital" to ensure the mission justifies a sovereign Tenant over deterministic tools.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user