fix: anchor proposal brief to mission charter -- CLO is internal ops, not a DTC agency
This commit is contained in:
@@ -142,14 +142,26 @@ steps:
|
||||
Otherwise, write the task message for the company_proposal pipeline.
|
||||
This brief becomes the input that drives the full business plan.
|
||||
|
||||
Include:
|
||||
- Which company to propose (name, slug, purpose in one sentence)
|
||||
- What gap it fills (specific -- what Edgar cannot do today without it)
|
||||
- Why now (cost of waiting another 30 days)
|
||||
- Proposed 90-day success criteria (measurable)
|
||||
- Known constraints or dependencies
|
||||
CRITICAL: Do NOT invent a company name. Use EXACTLY the company defined
|
||||
in the mission charter for the top-priority gap. The mission charter
|
||||
specifies the proposed solution for each gap by name and slug.
|
||||
You are reporting what the mission says, not brainstorming a new concept.
|
||||
|
||||
Be specific. This brief drives the entire proposal document.
|
||||
GAP 1 (CLO) is defined in the mission charter as:
|
||||
Company: Crimson Leaf Operations (CLO)
|
||||
Slug: crimson_leaf_operations
|
||||
Purpose: INTERNAL financial visibility -- give Edgar the ability to see
|
||||
API costs, revenue, and operational expenses.
|
||||
This is NOT a client-facing agency. NOT a storefront. NOT a DTC product.
|
||||
It is an internal accounting and reporting company for Crimson Leaf Holdings.
|
||||
|
||||
Your brief must:
|
||||
- Name the company EXACTLY as the mission defines it (no renaming, no rebranding)
|
||||
- Describe the specific gap it fills from the mission charter
|
||||
- Explain what Edgar cannot do today without it (financial blindness)
|
||||
- State why now (cost of waiting another 30 days)
|
||||
- Include 90-day success criteria (measurable, e.g. "weekly P&L report delivered")
|
||||
- Note known constraints or dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
Output ONLY the brief text. No labels. No preamble.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user