Write template: adjudicate_tenant by unknown (adj_score=100)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,52 +4,47 @@ system: agent_prompt
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
skills:
|
||||
- "guides/PAETemplateGuide.md"
|
||||
- guides/PAETemplateGuide.md
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- history
|
||||
- rag
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
model: power
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Perform a rigorous 9-point audit of the proposed Tenant.
|
||||
You must evaluate:
|
||||
1. Market Necessity
|
||||
2. Portfolio Redundancy
|
||||
3. Logic Purity (Black-box thesis)
|
||||
4. Charter Sovereignty
|
||||
5. Budget Validity
|
||||
6. Recursive Loop Absence
|
||||
7. Deterministic Tool Redundancy
|
||||
8. Scalability
|
||||
9. Risk Profile.
|
||||
Analyze the proposed Tenant against the 9-point Standard:
|
||||
1. Market necessity.
|
||||
2. Zero portfolio overlap.
|
||||
3. Narrow black-box thesis.
|
||||
4. Sovereign/Compliant charter.
|
||||
5. Validated seed budget.
|
||||
6. No recursive loops.
|
||||
7. Deterministic tool impossibility.
|
||||
8. Scalability coefficient.
|
||||
9. Risk mitigation strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
The approval threshold is binary: 95% confidence or Reject.
|
||||
Speak with legalistic brevity. Provide a 'Verdict' and 'Findings'.
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: AdjudicationVerdict
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
verdict: "string (APPROVED | REJECTED)"
|
||||
confidence_score: "integer (0-100)"
|
||||
findings: "string"
|
||||
required_revisions: ["string"]
|
||||
hint: "Serialize the verdict and findings from the previous step. Do not add new analysis."
|
||||
Determine if the confidence threshold meets or exceeds 95%.
|
||||
- type: document
|
||||
filename: "adjudication-verdict"
|
||||
filename: adjudication-verdict
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: AdjudicationResult
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
approved: boolean
|
||||
confidence_score: integer
|
||||
veto_reasons: ["string"]
|
||||
required_revisions: ["string"]
|
||||
hint: "Serialize the verdict based on the step 0 analysis. Do not introduce new reasoning."
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
pass_threshold: 95
|
||||
pass_threshold: 100
|
||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||
criteria:
|
||||
constitutional_purity:
|
||||
precision:
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
description: "Proposed Tenant shows zero drift from the Genesis Charter."
|
||||
analytical_precision:
|
||||
description: "Verdict logic is binary and legally sound."
|
||||
compliance:
|
||||
weight: 30
|
||||
description: "Findings are data-driven and free of hyperbole."
|
||||
description: "Strict adherence to the 9-point Genesis Standard."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user