Write template: adjudicate_tenant by unknown (adj_score=100)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,52 +4,47 @@ system: agent_prompt
|
|||||||
agent_prompt:
|
agent_prompt:
|
||||||
- "= identity.md"
|
- "= identity.md"
|
||||||
skills:
|
skills:
|
||||||
- "guides/PAETemplateGuide.md"
|
- guides/PAETemplateGuide.md
|
||||||
sections:
|
sections:
|
||||||
- agent
|
|
||||||
- project
|
- project
|
||||||
- history
|
|
||||||
- rag
|
- rag
|
||||||
- message
|
- message
|
||||||
- instructions
|
- instructions
|
||||||
steps:
|
steps:
|
||||||
- type: think
|
- type: think
|
||||||
model: power
|
|
||||||
hint: |
|
hint: |
|
||||||
Perform a rigorous 9-point audit of the proposed Tenant.
|
Analyze the proposed Tenant against the 9-point Standard:
|
||||||
You must evaluate:
|
1. Market necessity.
|
||||||
1. Market Necessity
|
2. Zero portfolio overlap.
|
||||||
2. Portfolio Redundancy
|
3. Narrow black-box thesis.
|
||||||
3. Logic Purity (Black-box thesis)
|
4. Sovereign/Compliant charter.
|
||||||
4. Charter Sovereignty
|
5. Validated seed budget.
|
||||||
5. Budget Validity
|
6. No recursive loops.
|
||||||
6. Recursive Loop Absence
|
7. Deterministic tool impossibility.
|
||||||
7. Deterministic Tool Redundancy
|
8. Scalability coefficient.
|
||||||
8. Scalability
|
9. Risk mitigation strategy.
|
||||||
9. Risk Profile.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The approval threshold is binary: 95% confidence or Reject.
|
Determine if the confidence threshold meets or exceeds 95%.
|
||||||
Speak with legalistic brevity. Provide a 'Verdict' and 'Findings'.
|
|
||||||
- type: package
|
|
||||||
packet_type: AdjudicationVerdict
|
|
||||||
schema:
|
|
||||||
verdict: "string (APPROVED | REJECTED)"
|
|
||||||
confidence_score: "integer (0-100)"
|
|
||||||
findings: "string"
|
|
||||||
required_revisions: ["string"]
|
|
||||||
hint: "Serialize the verdict and findings from the previous step. Do not add new analysis."
|
|
||||||
- type: document
|
- type: document
|
||||||
filename: "adjudication-verdict"
|
filename: adjudication-verdict
|
||||||
|
- type: package
|
||||||
|
packet_type: AdjudicationResult
|
||||||
|
schema:
|
||||||
|
approved: boolean
|
||||||
|
confidence_score: integer
|
||||||
|
veto_reasons: ["string"]
|
||||||
|
required_revisions: ["string"]
|
||||||
|
hint: "Serialize the verdict based on the step 0 analysis. Do not introduce new reasoning."
|
||||||
- type: close
|
- type: close
|
||||||
rag_update: true
|
rag_update: true
|
||||||
adjudication:
|
adjudication:
|
||||||
enabled: true
|
enabled: true
|
||||||
pass_threshold: 95
|
pass_threshold: 100
|
||||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||||
criteria:
|
criteria:
|
||||||
constitutional_purity:
|
precision:
|
||||||
weight: 70
|
weight: 70
|
||||||
description: "Proposed Tenant shows zero drift from the Genesis Charter."
|
description: "Verdict logic is binary and legally sound."
|
||||||
analytical_precision:
|
compliance:
|
||||||
weight: 30
|
weight: 30
|
||||||
description: "Findings are data-driven and free of hyperbole."
|
description: "Strict adherence to the 9-point Genesis Standard."
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user