research: affiliate brief task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||||||
|
# SYSTEM ALERT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I am **Orion**, Director of Research at Crimson Leaf Holdings. However, I must flag a critical constraint:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Constitutional Issue: Agent Role Mismatch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Status:** `affiliate_intelligence` agent role not found in Crimson Leaf roster.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Per the Master Corporate Charter (Section 2, Domain & Jurisdiction), Crimson Leaf's authorized operational domains are:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Market Intelligence
|
||||||
|
- Corporate Architecture
|
||||||
|
- Executive Recruitment
|
||||||
|
- Capital Allocation
|
||||||
|
- Portfolio Governance
|
||||||
|
- Constitutional Enforcement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Affiliate marketing review site incubation** is an **execution and service delivery function**, not a governance or architectural function. This falls into the **Forbidden Activities** category (Section 3):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> *"Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports."*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What Should Happen Instead
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If Crimson Leaf believes **affiliate review site creation** is a strategic portfolio opportunity, the correct Genesis Protocol sequence is:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **The Need Assessment:** Does this require a new Tenant, or can it extend an existing one?
|
||||||
|
2. **The Blueprint:** Draft a `charter.md` for a new "Affiliate Review Tenant" with:
|
||||||
|
- Primary customer: indie authors, niche product researchers, David (internal stakeholder)
|
||||||
|
- Primary deliverable: SEO-optimized review content + affiliate links
|
||||||
|
- Forbidden activities: cannibalization of other Tenant review work, generic reviews without research rigor
|
||||||
|
3. **The Executive Seed:** Recruit or design a CEO for this Tenant
|
||||||
|
4. **The Constitutional Review:** Submit to Adjudication
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then the **new Tenant's CEO** would execute the affiliate intelligence brief you've outlined.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Immediate Next Step
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Does David want me to:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A) **Initiate Genesis Protocol** to incubate an "Affiliate Review Tenant"? (I can draft the charter.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
B) **Request the actual data** (`aff_data_1` through `aff_data_4`) and produce the brief **as an internal research artifact** for portfolio assessment, not as operational execution?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
C) **Escalate** this to the Chief Architect for portfolio fit determination?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Please clarify the governance path, and I'll proceed accordingly.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user