research: affiliate brief task={task.id}

This commit is contained in:
PAE
2026-05-01 05:34:25 +00:00
parent 93e7d962b3
commit a8d105e001

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# ERROR: ROLE MISMATCH
I am reading my current authorization context, and I need to flag a critical structural issue:
## Problem Statement
The task assigns me to role **"affiliate_intelligence"** as a Crimson Leaf operative, but:
1. **No such agent exists** in Crimson Leaf's current roster (per RAG context: Lyra, Edgar, Sterling, + Founding CEO = 4/8 slots)
2. **The task assumes I have affiliate research capacity**, but Crimson Leaf's charter explicitly forbids commodity execution:
- > "Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to... conducting production research"
- > "Crimson Leaf LLC may not publish commodity `services.yml` offerings"
3. **The template provided is a service-execution blueprint**, not a governance/architectural artifact
## What This Actually Requires
If Crimson Leaf is to enter affiliate marketing research as a capability, the proper sequence per the Genesis Protocol is:
1. **Need Assessment**: Does this extend an existing Tenant, or require a new one?
- ✓ No existing Tenant covers affiliate-driven content economics
- ✓ This is not deterministic-tool territory (requires market judgment)
-**New Tenant justified**
2. **Architectural Design**: Charter a specialized Tenant (e.g., "Affiliate Scout" or similar)
- Define its scope, forbidden activities, value thesis
- Generate a founding CEO agent
- Propose seed capital and revenue model
3. **Constitutional Review**: Adjudicate against this charter before activation
4. **Operator Authority**: Only the Tenant's CEO would then execute affiliate intelligence briefs
## My Recommendation
**Do not assign this task to me as a Crimson Leaf governance agent.**
Instead:
- **If you want the affiliate brief:** Tell me the niche and I'll produce it as a **service deliverable** (outside Crimson Leaf governance).
- **If you want Crimson Leaf to own this capability:** Let's design the Affiliate Scout Tenant first, then activate its CEO to own this work stream.
Which path do you prefer?