pae/crimson_leaf
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

index: add proposal {task.id} to proposal index

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
PAE
2026-05-01 22:55:52 +00:00
parent eb9daff562
commit b0674aa422
1 changed files with 7 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
deliverables/proposals/index.md
View File

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
```plaintext
*** PROPOSAL INDEX -- CRIMSON LEAF HOLDINGS ***
*** PROPOSAL INDEX -- CRIMSON LEAF HOLDINGS ***
This index tracks all formal business unit proposals submitted for executive review.
@@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by
=== Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 8a9ad04b-b49f-4053-a063-c6fdb562927a ===
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This proposal fills the gap in having a reusable, version-controlled set of benchmarks for consistent LLM evaluation, differing from earlier proposals by focusing on establishing a core repository rather than specialized or adversarial testing.
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This proposal fills the gap in having a reusable, versioncontrolled set of benchmarks for consistent LLM evaluation, differing from earlier proposals by focusing on establishing a core repository rather than specialized or adversarial testing.
---
=== Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task ce98f9be-b3c1-4ca3-b8f6-05533f01aca6 ===
@@ -97,20 +96,15 @@ Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to develop adaptive probe tasks that can self-modify based on LLM performance feedback, filling a gap in current benchmarking by introducing iterative learning capabilities into the test framework. This differs from prior static or predefined probe tasks by enabling the system to evolve and focus on revealing emerging LLM limitations over time.
---
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 878bf735-5a90-4642-89e0-1efcbfcb7051
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task b2efc2e2-38b8-440c-a265-e7b3e5277c07
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to integrate and evaluate the effectiveness of previously developed probe tasks within new, unforeseen LLM scenarios. This addresses the gap in cross-scenario validation by leveraging pre-existing probes to test LLM adaptability and performance in novel contexts, differing from prior proposals by focusing on the reuse and adaptation of existing frameworks rather than purely on creation or emulation.
Summary: This proposal outlines the creation of standardized Foreman Probe tasks to quantify model performance across specialized construction logic. It fills the gap in objective unit testing for the Foreman system by providing a fixed reference for regression analysis, differing from earlier adaptive or comprehensive proposals by prioritizing the establishment of a simplified, high-fidelity baseline for rapid iteration.
---
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task e8dfe704-2f1f-449f-8f4f-815585ea2f04
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in performance evaluation by providing a structured approach to assessing LLM capabilities in Foreman-generated tasks. It differs from prior proposals by focusing on the creation of a standardized set of probe tasks that can be used consistently across different evaluations.
---
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 74cb6112-820d-4cd5-989c-3f4f558e2732
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 3e027700-5896-4e32-810c-a930f64d5cdf
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. It fills the gap in internal performance evaluation enabling automated testing and continuous monitoring. It differs from prior proposals by focusing on Foreman-specific workflows and integration with the operational pipeline.
```
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. It fills the gap in cross-validated performance measurement by introducing a peer-review layer into the probe task design process, ensuring that individual task definitions are independently verified before deployment. This differs from prior proposals by emphasizing collaborative task validation over singular authorship, adaptive self-modification, or static baseline establishment.