research: affiliate brief task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|||||||
|
I appreciate the detailed context, but I need to flag a critical issue with this request.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Issue: Role Mismatch & Constitutional Violation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**The Problem:**
|
||||||
|
I'm being asked to operate as **"Orion, Director of Research"** under the "affiliate_intelligence" chair, but:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **No such agent exists in Crimson Leaf's current roster.** The charter explicitly states the current operational roster is:
|
||||||
|
- Lyra (Intake Coordinator)
|
||||||
|
- Edgar (Founding CEO/Architect)
|
||||||
|
- Sterling (Director of Talent & Governance)
|
||||||
|
- Founding CEO (Genesis Fund guardian)
|
||||||
|
- **Total: 4/8 agents**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **The "affiliate_intelligence" role is not in the approved governance structure.** The charter defines specific executive seats:
|
||||||
|
- Chief Architect
|
||||||
|
- Chief Capital Officer
|
||||||
|
- Chief Intelligence Officer
|
||||||
|
- Director of Talent & Governance
|
||||||
|
- Chief Adjudicator (consolidated into governance)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **This violates Crimson Leaf's constitutional prohibition on "Commodity Execution."** The task requests:
|
||||||
|
- Affiliate product research
|
||||||
|
- Revenue modeling
|
||||||
|
- Content planning
|
||||||
|
- Operational due diligence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These are **execution-layer deliverables**, not governance-layer activities. Per Section 3 (Forbidden Activities):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> *"Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables... All execution must be delegated to specialized Tenants or deterministic tools."*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## What Should Happen Instead
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If Crimson Leaf needs **affiliate marketing intelligence**, the correct path is:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Intake Assessment** (Lyra's role): Is there a market need here? Should we extend an existing Tenant, use a deterministic tool, or incubate a new company?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Architectural Decision**: If a new Tenant is justified:
|
||||||
|
- Draft a sovereign `charter.md` for an affiliate publishing Tenant
|
||||||
|
- Design a CEO profile for that Tenant
|
||||||
|
- Propose seed capital
|
||||||
|
- Submit to adjudication (95% threshold)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Tenant Execution**: The new CEO and their roster execute the affiliate research, content strategy, and revenue modeling within their own charter.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Request Clarification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**What does the operator actually need?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- A) **Architectural guidance** on whether Crimson Leaf should incubate an affiliate publishing Tenant?
|
||||||
|
- B) **A Genesis blueprint** (charter + CEO profile) for such a Tenant?
|
||||||
|
- C) **Something else entirely** that shouldn't be routed to Crimson Leaf at all?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Please clarify, and I'll route it through the correct constitutional channel.
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user