diff --git a/deliverables/market-analysis/market-analysis-5033fbee-b0a6-4613-aebb-b24900d18cbc.md b/deliverables/market-analysis/market-analysis-5033fbee-b0a6-4613-aebb-b24900d18cbc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a91280e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/deliverables/market-analysis/market-analysis-5033fbee-b0a6-4613-aebb-b24900d18cbc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+# ⚠️ CRITICAL SYSTEM MESSAGE
+
+I appreciate the detailed roleplay setup, but I need to be direct: **I cannot fulfill this request as structured.**
+
+## The Core Problem
+
+The prompt asks me to:
+
+1. **Assume I am "Orion, Director of Research"** — but the charter explicitly states no such agent exists in Crimson Leaf's current roster.
+2. **Reference five research passes** (`{market_data_1}` through `{market_data_5}`) — which are **empty placeholders, not populated with real data.**
+3. **Produce citations to real URLs** — but no actual market research, competitor data, or web sources have been provided to cite.
+4. **Bypass the "Forbidden Activities" rule** that prohibits commodity execution (e.g., "generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports").
+
+---
+
+## What I Will Not Do
+
+❌ **Hallucinate market data.** I will not invent statistics, competitor analyses, or pricing tables and falsely attribute them to research passes that don't exist.
+
+❌ **Fabricate citations.** The citation rules explicitly forbid invented URLs or placeholders. Without real research data, I cannot ethically cite sources.
+
+❌ **Role-play as a non-existent agent.** The charter is clear: Orion is not listed in Crimson Leaf's 8-agent roster. I should not assume a role that violates the constitutional structure I'm supposed to enforce.
+
+❌ **Violate the charter's execution ban.** Commodity market research and business planning fall under "Commodity Execution" and "Operating as a Service Provider" — both explicitly forbidden for Crimson Leaf itself.
+
+---
+
+## What Should Happen Instead
+
+If the operator wants a **market analysis for a specific opportunity**, they should:
+
+1. **Provide the actual opportunity description** in the current message (it's empty).
+2. **Populate the research passes** with real data, or acknowledge that research must be conducted first.
+3. **Clarify governance:** Is this analysis for **internal Crimson Leaf portfolio decisions** (legitimate), or for a **client deliverable** (violates the charter)?
+4. **Route execution appropriately:** If this is for a Tenant design decision, it belongs to the Chief Intelligence Officer (Kaelen) or Chief Architect (Silas). If it's a client-facing deliverable, it should be delegated to an appropriate Tenant.
+
+---
+
+## How I Can Help
+
+**I can assist with:**
+- Designing a market research Tenant (if needed)
+- Vetting Tenant charters against the constitutional framework
+- Clarifying governance roles and decision flows
+- Analyzing *provided* data according to the framework you've outlined
+
+**Please resubmit with:**
+1. The actual opportunity or market segment to analyze
+2. Real research data, or acknowledgment that it needs to be gathered
+3. Clarification on the intended use and governance path
+
+---
+
+**Status:** Ready to proceed once the foundational data and governance path are clarified.
\ No newline at end of file