diff --git a/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md b/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
index 846ff03..eb48d9b 100644
--- a/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
+++ b/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
@@ -1,38 +1,26 @@
-To adjudicate the proposed Tenant, we'll follow the 9-point Standard as outlined in the charter:
+## Adjudication Review
 
-1. **Market Necessity:**
-The Tenant's mission aligns with a specific market need, as determined through market intelligence.
+Based on the provided information, I review the proposed Tenant against the 9-point Standard as outlined in the Genesis Protocol:
 
-2. **Zero Portfolio Overlap:**
-Upon review, there is no duplication of Tenant missions that would violate this principle.
+1. **Market necessity**: The proposed Tenant needs to address a specific market need.
+2. **Zero portfolio overlap**: There should be no redundancy with existing Tenants within the portfolio.
+3. **Narrow black-box thesis**: The Tenant's mission must be clearly defined and not overly broad.
+4. **Sovereign/Compliant charter**: The Tenant must have a well-defined, sovereign charter that adheres to Crimson Leaf's governance rules.
+5. **Validated seed budget**: A justified seed budget is required for the proposed Tenant.
+6. **No recursive loops**: Recursive business design requirements must be met.
+7. **Deterministic tool impossibility**: The Tenant should not require arbitrary, non-deterministic tools for execution.
+8. **Scalability coefficient**: The proposal's scalability potential should be clearly justified.
+9. **Risk mitigation strategy**: A viable risk management plan is necessary.
 
-3. **Narrow Black-Box Thesis:**
-The proposed business thesis clearly defines the Tenant's domain and services without excessive complexity.
+## Analysis
 
-4. **Sovereign/Compliant Charter:**
-All documentation and templates conform to Crimson Leaf's constitutionally approved design requirements.
+Upon thorough review, I notice that the proposed Tenant:
 
-5. **Validated Seed Budget:**
-Budget allocation justifies expected value, startup complexity, strategic priority, and market intelligence, with no evidence of unsound assumptions.
+* Meets criteria 1 through 4: It provides a specific market need, addresses zero portfolio overlap, and adheres to the sovereign/Compliant charter requirements.
+* Exceeds expected validation standards for criteria 8 (scalability potential) with a notable risk mitigation strategy in place.
+* Fails to meet an initial review assessment at 9: The proposed Tenant's mission necessitates deterministic execution tools, not arbitrary non-deterministic ones.
 
-6. **No Recursive Loops:**
-The Tenant does not plan for service chaining without meaningful termination. Any further delegation is already bound within the charter context.
+## Threshold Result
+Based on the above analysis, I conclude that the proposed Tenant fails to meet the 95% confidence threshold due to a critical shortcoming in item 7 (deterministic tool impossibility).
 
-7. **Deterministic Tool Impossibility:**
-Execution must be undertaken by specialized Tenants or by deterministic tools, since no generalist capabilities are proposed for Crimson Leaf itself.
-
-8. **Scalability Coefficient:**
-The budgeted Seed represents an appropriate resource threshold that aligns with expected value and startup complexity.
-
-9. **Risk Mitigation Strategy:**
-Clear provisions have been laid to manage external risks through a mix of non-goals, constitutional safeguards, and platform control measures.
-
-On these nine pillars, the proposed Tenant seems comprehensive enough to ensure potential operational purity while offering significant opportunities for strategic leverage in an emerging market.
-
-Confidence Threshold Evaluation:
-
-- **Total Confidence**: The proposed Tenant passes the review against Crimson Leaf's `Standard` with a high level of clarity.
-  
-Overall Analysis: 
-
-**CONFidence LEVEL:** 97/100
\ No newline at end of file
+**Final verdict**: The proposed creation of this new Tenant does NOT satisfy Crimson Leaf's high standards and should be rejected through Constitutional Review.
\ No newline at end of file