index: add proposal {task.id} to proposal index
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
|||||||
### PROPOSAL INDEX -- CRIMSON LEAF HOLDINGS
|
```text
|
||||||
|
### PROPOSAL INDEX -- CRIMSON LEAF HOLDINGS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This index tracks all formal business unit proposals submitted for executive review.
|
This index tracks all formal business unit proposals submitted for executive review.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -64,4 +65,10 @@ Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by
|
|||||||
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 9bbf2b06-946c-4058-bcc7-18828d0fdaa5
|
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 9bbf2b06-946c-4058-bcc7-18828d0fdaa5
|
||||||
Date: 2026-04-29
|
Date: 2026-04-29
|
||||||
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
|
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
|
||||||
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in internal evaluation by providing a focused framework for testing LLM performance in Foreman-specific scenarios. It differs from prior proposals by emphasizing the direct application of these tasks in operational contexts, integrating both technical metrics and practical workflows for more robust validation.
|
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in internal evaluation by providing a focused framework for testing LLM performance in Foreman-specific scenarios. It differs from prior proposals by emphasizing the direct application of these tasks in operational contexts, integrating both technical metrics and practical workflows for more robust validation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 9a12ab55-5018-46f7-9420-32b2fff39c38
|
||||||
|
Date: 2026-04-29
|
||||||
|
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
|
||||||
|
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. It fills the gap in internal performance assessment by providing a focused framework to validate the Foreman's task generation processes. This differs from prior proposals by prioritizing the direct modeling of Foreman-created tasks for optimized operational use.
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user