diff --git a/templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml b/templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml index a9fec3c..bb61b4e 100644 --- a/templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml +++ b/templates/portfolio_architectural_review.yml @@ -1,47 +1,47 @@ -name: portfolio_architectural_review -description: "Critically evaluates a proposed Tenant for structural purity, eliminates redundancy, and formalizes the sovereign Charter." -debug: true -system: agent_prompt -agent_prompt: - - "= identity.md" -sections: - - project - - history - - rag - - message - - instructions -steps: - - type: think - hint: | - Perform a rigorous architectural audit of the proposed business unit. - 1. Apply Occam's Razor: Is this a company, or just a workflow/tool? - 2. Check for Redundancy: Does this overlap with existing Tenants? - 3. Verify Sovereignty: Can this operate as a discrete black box? - Identify any circular dependencies or vague service boundaries. - - type: think - hint: | - Based on the previous audit, draft the formal 'charter.md'. - Define the Input/Output clarity, the narrow service boundary, and the specific non-generalist mission. - Reference {steps[0].text} for constraints. - - type: document - filename: charter - - type: package - packet_type: GovernanceResponse - schema: - status: "string" - recommendation: "string" - charter_id: "string" - hint: "Summarize the architectural standing and provide the Gitea reference for the new charter." - - type: close - rag_update: true -adjudication: - enabled: true - pass_threshold: 90 - deliverable_type: coordination - criteria: - structural_purity: - weight: 60 - description: "Proposed unit has zero overlap and clear black-box boundaries." - operational_clarity: - weight: 40 +name: portfolio_architectural_review +description: "Critically evaluates a proposed Tenant for structural purity, eliminates redundancy, and formalizes the sovereign Charter." +debug: true +system: agent_prompt +agent_prompt: + - "= identity.md" +sections: + - project + - history + - rag + - message + - instructions +steps: + - type: think + hint: | + Perform a rigorous architectural audit of the proposed business unit. + 1. Apply Occam's Razor: Is this a company, or just a workflow/tool? + 2. Check for Redundancy: Does this overlap with existing Tenants? + 3. Verify Sovereignty: Can this operate as a discrete black box? + Identify any circular dependencies or vague service boundaries. + - type: think + hint: | + Based on the previous audit, draft the formal 'charter.md'. + Define the Input/Output clarity, the narrow service boundary, and the specific non-generalist mission. + Reference {steps[0].text} for constraints. + - type: document + filename: charter + - type: package + packet_type: GovernanceResponse + schema: + status: "string" + recommendation: "string" + charter_id: "string" + hint: "Summarize the architectural standing and provide the Gitea reference for the new charter." + - type: close + rag_update: true +adjudication: + enabled: true + pass_threshold: 90 + deliverable_type: coordination + criteria: + structural_purity: + weight: 60 + description: "Proposed unit has zero overlap and clear black-box boundaries." + operational_clarity: + weight: 40 description: "The charter defines specific inputs and outputs without recursive loops." \ No newline at end of file