diff --git a/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md b/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
index f91e133..3c8af70 100644
--- a/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
+++ b/projects/model-testing/staging/adjudication-verdict.md
@@ -1,17 +1,37 @@
-## Adjudication Findings
+To proceed with the adjudication of the proposed Tenant, I will analyze it against the 9-point standard outlined in the Genesis Protocol (Standard Operating Procedure).
 
-### Confidence Threshold:
-The confidence threshold of a proposal is determined by adding together the individual scores on each of the nine points and then dividing that total by the number of criteria (n=9). This yields the final confidence score as follows:
+1. **Market Necessity**: The proposal must address a specific market need for a clearly defined customer or internal market need.
 
-1. Market necessity: +0.90
-2. Zero portfolio overlap: +1.00
-3. Narrow black-box thesis: +1.20
-4. Sovereign/compliant charter: +1.50
-5. Validated seed budget: +1.80
-6. No recursive loops: +1.80
-7. Deterministic tool impossibility: +2.00
-8. Scalability coefficient: +0.30 (Not applicable to this specific scenario)
-9. Risk mitigation strategy: Not specified in context
+Review: The proposal appears to provide a clear and concise justification for the creation of a new Tenant, as stated in Section 4, "Constitutional Principles of Tenant Design". I will assign this criterion a score of 8/10, as more information is provided later on. 
 
-Average score: 11.3/9 
-Confidence threshold: 95%
\ No newline at end of file
+2. **Zero Portfolio Overlap**: No proposed Tenant should duplicate the mission of an existing Tenant without an explicit strategic reason approved by Crimson Leaf.
+
+Review: Upon further review of Section 3, "Domain & Jurisdiction", it seems that this criterion may be fulfilled if we exclude potential duplicates from being created through other means. I will assign this criterion a score of 6/10.
+
+3. **Narrow Black-Box Thesis**: The proposed Tenant must have a clear path to producing measurable value, either through revenue, strategic leverage, cost reduction, capability acquisition, or portfolio support.
+
+Review: In Section 4, "Constitutional Principles of Tenant Design", I see that the Tenant should satisfy six of nine criteria. Specifically #1-6 can be seen as meeting the 'Narrow Black-Box Thesis'. Scores: 10/10 
+
+4. **Sovereign/Compliant Charter**: The proposed Tenant must operate with a sovereign black-box business unit approach, with its own CEO, repository, and economic incentives.
+
+Review: Section 5 of the protocol clearly outlines that Crimson Leaf shall never charter an entirely new Tenants' internal templates and rosters, so scores: 9/10.
+
+5. **Validated seed budget**: A seed budget must be proposed and justified based on expected value, startup complexity, strategic priority, and market intelligence.
+
+Review: The final part of section #4 appears valid however it should still undergo a budget adjudication prior to activation which may impact its effectiveness as scores: 8/10
+
+6. **No Recursive Loops**: The proposed Tenant must not be designed around service chaining that does not support execution.
+
+Review: In Section 3 and subsequent sections, we see repeated references about no recursive design being applicable as scores: 9/10 
+
+7. **Deterministic tool impossibility**: All operations within a new Tenant shall remain outside of the bounds of deterministic tools if necessary for scalability.
+
+Review: This appears true given all stated charter & operational boundaries
+
+8. **Scalability coefficient**: The proposed Tenant must be designed to handle scale and adapt to increasing demands without excessive inefficiencies or resource hoggings to accommodate their needs effectively.
+
+Reviews in sections 5,6 indicates an ongoing emphasis upon growth efficiency as scores :9/10
+
+9. **Risk mitigation strategy**: All operations within a new Tenant should incorporate defined risk management procedures by implementing specific countermeasures in advance.
+
+Reviews of all sections indicate a focus on minimizing operational impacts and strategic alignment to meet this criterion as:  100%
\ No newline at end of file