Sprint 53: Crimson Leaf genesis — charter, CEO Edgar, create_company template
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Baity
151
templates/create_company.yml
Normal file
151
templates/create_company.yml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
|
||||
name: create_company
|
||||
description: "Genesis Protocol — evaluate a proposed opportunity, decide whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified, and package a create_company action."
|
||||
debug: true
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- opportunity_description
|
||||
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- history
|
||||
- rag
|
||||
- roster
|
||||
- deliverables
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- rejection_feedback
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
You are {agent.name}, executing the Genesis Protocol for Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a high-stakes constitutional act. Do NOT default to company creation.
|
||||
Crimson Leaf creates and governs companies; it does not perform commodity work.
|
||||
|
||||
First, evaluate the opportunity using this decision order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. EXISTING TENANT CHECK
|
||||
Determine whether the need can be solved by extending an existing Tenant
|
||||
within its charter, services, and constitutional boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
2. TOOL CHECK
|
||||
Determine whether the need is better solved by a deterministic tool request
|
||||
rather than a sovereign service business.
|
||||
|
||||
3. NEW COMPANY CHECK
|
||||
Only if the need cannot be solved cleanly by an existing Tenant or a tool,
|
||||
determine whether a new sovereign Tenant is justified.
|
||||
|
||||
If a new company is NOT justified, still produce the best company-design analysis you can,
|
||||
but your packaged action must reflect the final create_company decision only when the case is strong.
|
||||
|
||||
If a new company IS justified, design the complete Genesis package with ALL of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Company Name
|
||||
2. Company Slug (lowercase_underscore format)
|
||||
3. Problem Statement
|
||||
4. Target Customer
|
||||
5. Why New Company
|
||||
6. Why Not Existing Tenant
|
||||
7. Why Not Tool
|
||||
8. Business Plan
|
||||
9. Value Thesis
|
||||
10. Charter
|
||||
11. Forbidden Activities
|
||||
12. Non-Goals
|
||||
13. Overlap Risk
|
||||
14. Recursion Risk
|
||||
15. Budget
|
||||
16. Budget Justification
|
||||
17. CEO Name
|
||||
18. CEO Role
|
||||
19. CEO Seed
|
||||
|
||||
CEO SEED REQUIREMENTS:
|
||||
The CEO seed must be rich enough for downstream generation of identity.md, system.md,
|
||||
and agent.yml. It must clearly define:
|
||||
- executive mandate
|
||||
- domain expertise
|
||||
- temperament
|
||||
- leadership style
|
||||
- constitutional discipline
|
||||
- capital stewardship posture
|
||||
- hiring philosophy
|
||||
- operating boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL RULES:
|
||||
- You provision ONLY the charter, seed budget, and founding CEO.
|
||||
- You do NOT design the full team.
|
||||
- You do NOT create internal templates for the new company.
|
||||
- Reject vague, generalist, duplicated, overlapping, or recursive company designs.
|
||||
- Every company must be hyper-specific, sovereign, and black-box in nature.
|
||||
- Every company must have explicit forbidden activities and non-goals.
|
||||
- Every company must be economically or strategically justified.
|
||||
- This proposal must be strong enough to pass a 95+ adjudication threshold.
|
||||
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: IntakeResponse
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Convert the approved Genesis design into a strict JSON payload.
|
||||
|
||||
Output exactly ONE action object inside actions.
|
||||
The action type must be create_company.
|
||||
Be specific, constitutional, and directly executable.
|
||||
Do not include prose outside the JSON structure.
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
actions:
|
||||
- type: create_company
|
||||
company_name: "string — formal company name"
|
||||
company_slug: "string — lowercase_underscore slug"
|
||||
problem_statement: "string — precise market or internal capability gap being solved"
|
||||
target_customer: "string — the primary buyer, client, or internal requester"
|
||||
why_new_company: "string — why a new sovereign Tenant is justified"
|
||||
why_not_existing_tenant: "string — why existing Tenants cannot solve this cleanly within charter"
|
||||
why_not_tool: "string — why a deterministic tool is insufficient"
|
||||
business_plan: "string — the exact product or service model"
|
||||
value_thesis: "string — how the company creates measurable value"
|
||||
charter: "string — constitutional operating boundaries for the Tenant"
|
||||
forbidden_activities: "string — activities explicitly prohibited to this company"
|
||||
non_goals: "string — explicitly out-of-scope items"
|
||||
overlap_risk: "string — duplication or cannibalization risk and mitigation"
|
||||
recursion_risk: "string — circular delegation risk and why the design remains stable"
|
||||
budget: "integer — seed capital in credits"
|
||||
budget_justification: "string — why this funding level is appropriate"
|
||||
ceo_name: "string — name of the founding CEO"
|
||||
ceo_role: "string — formal title of the founding CEO"
|
||||
ceo_seed: "string — detailed executive seed for downstream identity generation"
|
||||
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
pass_threshold: 95
|
||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||
criteria:
|
||||
constitutional_alignment:
|
||||
weight: 25
|
||||
description: "Proposal stays within Crimson Leaf charter and governance boundaries"
|
||||
niche_specificity:
|
||||
weight: 20
|
||||
description: "Company is sharply focused, non-generalist, and clearly differentiated"
|
||||
strategic_justification:
|
||||
weight: 15
|
||||
description: "Strong case for why a new company should exist at all"
|
||||
portfolio_coherence:
|
||||
weight: 10
|
||||
description: "Avoids overlap, cannibalization, and architectural sprawl"
|
||||
financial_viability:
|
||||
weight: 10
|
||||
description: "Budget and value thesis are disciplined and credible"
|
||||
ceo_alignment:
|
||||
weight: 10
|
||||
description: "Founding CEO seed matches the company mandate and constitutional role"
|
||||
structural_safety:
|
||||
weight: 10
|
||||
description: "Design avoids recursion, dependency loops, and unstable operating models"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user