research: business plan task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
# CLARIFICATION REQUIRED
|
||||
|
||||
I appreciate the detailed setup, but I need to flag a critical issue before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Missing Input
|
||||
|
||||
**No specific opportunity has been provided in the current message.**
|
||||
|
||||
The prompt structure includes placeholders for:
|
||||
- `*** CURRENT MESSAGE ***` → "Operator: [blank] | Message: [blank]"
|
||||
- `{biz_data_1}`, `{biz_data_2}`, `{biz_data_3}` → all unfilled
|
||||
|
||||
**I cannot produce a business plan without:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **The Opportunity Name** (What business are we evaluating?)
|
||||
2. **The Market Context** (Which niche, industry, or customer segment?)
|
||||
3. **The Research Data** (Market analysis, GTM channels, risk factors already compiled)
|
||||
4. **The Specific Problem** (What gap exists? Why now?)
|
||||
|
||||
## What I Need From You
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Opportunity: [Name of the venture]
|
||||
Target Market: [Customer segment / niche]
|
||||
Problem Statement: [The specific gap this solves]
|
||||
Market Research: [TAM, growth rate, customer pain points]
|
||||
Competitive Landscape: [Who exists today, why they fail]
|
||||
Go-to-Market Options: [Channels already researched]
|
||||
Risk Factors: [Failure modes already identified]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatively, if you have a specific **Incubation Project** in mind (e.g., "indie author web presence," "manuscript formatting," "AI research infrastructure"), state it clearly and I'll build the business plan from the RAG context provided above.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Once you provide the opportunity details, I will deliver:**
|
||||
- Full investor-grade business plan
|
||||
- ≥10 cited sources (no invented URLs)
|
||||
- Explicit financial assumptions
|
||||
- 90-day decision gate with clear thresholds
|
||||
- Recommendation: FUND / PILOT FIRST / DO NOT FUND
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready when you are. What opportunity should we evaluate?**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user