Write template: adjudicate_tenant by unknown (adj_score=100)
This commit is contained in:
57
templates/adjudicate_tenant.yml
Normal file
57
templates/adjudicate_tenant.yml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
name: adjudicate_tenant
|
||||
description: "Constitutional evaluation of a proposed Tenant against the 9-point Genesis Standard."
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
requires:
|
||||
- proposed_charter
|
||||
- seed_budget
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- rag
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
model: power
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Perform a rigorous audit of the proposed Tenant.
|
||||
Evaluate against the 9-point Tenant Creation Standard.
|
||||
Verify:
|
||||
1. Absolute market necessity.
|
||||
2. Zero overlap with existing portfolio.
|
||||
3. Narrow, black-box business thesis.
|
||||
4. Sovereign, yet compliant charter.
|
||||
5. Validated seed budget.
|
||||
6. Absence of recursive loops or internal circularity.
|
||||
|
||||
Output a binary verdict: APPROVED or VETOED.
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Based on the previous analysis, draft the formal Adjudication Ledger entry.
|
||||
Include specific citations from the Genesis Charter for any rejection.
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
packet_type: AdjudicationVerdict
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
verdict: "string"
|
||||
confidence_score: "integer"
|
||||
citations: ["string"]
|
||||
revisions_required: ["string"]
|
||||
approved_for_capital_review: "boolean"
|
||||
hint: "Serialize the verdict. Ensure zero discourse occurs in this step."
|
||||
- type: document
|
||||
filename: adjudication-verdict
|
||||
- type: close
|
||||
rag_update: true
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: true
|
||||
pass_threshold: 95
|
||||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||||
criteria:
|
||||
precision:
|
||||
weight: 70
|
||||
description: "Strict adherence to the 9-point standard and Genesis Charter."
|
||||
brevity:
|
||||
weight: 30
|
||||
description: "Absence of filler, hyperbole, or non-legalistic language."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user