Ready for Test 61

templates/strategic_review.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+name: strategic_review
+description: "Crimson Leaf 24-hour strategic review — full portfolio evaluation from each executive's perspective."
+debug: true
+model: power
+system: agent_prompt
+
+agent_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+participant_prompt:
+  - "= identity.md"
+
+sections:
+  - agent
+  - project
+  - history
+  - participants
+  - participants_prompt
+  - rag
+  - message
+  - instructions
+
+builders:
+  message: |
+    *** PORTFOLIO REPORT ***
+    {steps[0].text}
+
+steps:
+  - type: tool
+    action: get_portfolio_report
+    output_key: portfolio_data
+
+  - type: think
+    max_tokens: 8000
+    rotate_participants: true
+    loop:
+      max_iterations: 3
+    hint: |
+      You are {agent.name}, participating in the Crimson Leaf Holdings strategic review.
+      This is round {task.iteration} of the board session.
+
+      The portfolio report is above. Analyze it from YOUR perspective:
+
+      - If you are Edgar (The Operator): Focus on systems health, metrics, what's broken,
+        what needs fixing. Are companies executing? Are processes working?
+
+      - If you are Orion (The Visionary): Focus on opportunities, growth, what we're missing.
+        Are we building the right things? What should we start? What should we kill?
+
+      - If you are Sloane (The Dealmaker): Focus on marketing, visibility, revenue.
+        Are we selling? Does anyone know we exist? What channels are we missing?
+
+      Build on previous speakers' points. Disagree if you must — this is a board debate.
+
+      When genuine consensus is reached across all perspectives, include exactly:
+      "consensus_reached: true"
+      If debate should continue, do NOT include that line.
+
+  - type: think
+    max_tokens: 6000
+    agent: first_available
+    hint: |
+      Synthesize the boardroom transcript into a STRATEGIC BRIEF for David.
+
+      Structure:
+      1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — one paragraph on portfolio health
+      2. CRITICAL ISSUES — things that need immediate attention (if any)
+      3. OPPORTUNITIES — ranked by priority
+      4. ACTION ITEMS — specific tasks for David, formatted as:
+         "David, [verb]: [details]"
+      5. NEXT REVIEW — what should we focus on in the next 24-hour review?
+
+      Keep it actionable. David is one person — prioritize ruthlessly.
+
+  - type: reply
+    target: discussion
+
+adjudication:
+  enabled: false