proposal: company_proposal task={task.id}
This commit is contained in:
PAE
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
|
||||
# Proposal: Foreman Probe
|
||||
Submitted by: Edgar Chen, CEO, Crimson Leaf Holdings
|
||||
Task ID: 1f18ffb5-53b4-4655-bb26-12587d2a4e41
|
||||
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
1. **PROPOSED COMPANY**
|
||||
- Full Name: Foreman Probe
|
||||
- Purpose: Foreman Probe will model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities.
|
||||
- Gap: This company addresses the lack of systematic, industry-specific benchmarking for Large Language Models (LLMs) within the construction sector, which is crucial for evaluating their suitability and performance for foreman-level tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **PROBLEM STATEMENT**
|
||||
Crimson Leaf currently cannot reliably assess the practical applicability and performance of LLMs for construction-specific use cases such as task generation, safety analysis, or project progress reporting. Without Foreman Probe, Crimson Leaf lacks a standardized method to benchmark LLMs against the unique demands and jargon of the construction industry, hindering its ability to identify and develop AI solutions tailored for this sector.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **MARKET OPPORTUNITY**
|
||||
The global AI market was valued at $227.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach $1.75 trillion by 2032, with a CAGR of 36.2% [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market). This explosive growth is mirrored in the LLM market, which is expected to grow significantly, with some sources predicting a CAGR of over 40% [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market). Concurrently, construction technology spending is projected to increase by 10-15% annually [The Future of Construction - Technology and Innovation](https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/real-estate/future-of-construction.html). Foreman Probe directly targets the intersection of these growing markets by providing essential benchmarking tools for AI in construction. The absence of direct case studies necessitates a structural feasibility analysis: the proposed company leverages existing AI technology advancements (cloud infrastructure, GPU acceleration, ML libraries, NLP APIs) [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market), [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market) and a focus on construction-specific software integrations [The Future of Construction - Technology and Innovation](https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/real-estate/future-of-construction.html), indicating a clear path to market entry and potential for significant value capture.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **PROPOSED SOLUTION**
|
||||
Foreman Probe will close the identified gap by developing and deploying a suite of LLM probe tasks specifically designed to evaluate the performance of AI models on tasks relevant to construction foremen.
|
||||
|
||||
- **First 30 Days:**
|
||||
* Define and document the core set of probe tasks, focusing on common foreman responsibilities (e.g., daily reporting, safety checks, task delegation).
|
||||
* Identify and onboard initial LLM candidates for benchmarking.
|
||||
* Set up the necessary cloud infrastructure and development environment for task execution and evaluation.
|
||||
- **First 90 Days:**
|
||||
* Execute initial benchmarking runs for selected LLMs against the defined probe tasks.
|
||||
* Develop initial analysis and reporting dashboards to visualize LLM performance metrics.
|
||||
* Begin incorporating construction-specific jargon and workflows into probe tasks based on preliminary findings and industry expert feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **STRATEGIC FIT**
|
||||
Foreman Probe directly advances Crimson Leaf's primary mission of profitable AI publishing by creating a critical, specialized product that addresses a significant unmet need in a large and growing industry. By establishing a definitive benchmark for LLM performance in construction, Foreman Probe will position Crimson Leaf as a thought leader and essential service provider, enabling the company to identify, validate, and ultimately publish high-value AI solutions for the construction sector, driving revenue and market share.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Sources
|
||||
[1] [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
[2] [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
[3] [The Future of Construction - Technology and Innovation](https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/real-estate/future-of-construction.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Statistics
|
||||
* **Global AI market size in 2023:** $227.5 billion -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **AI market projected growth by 2032:** $1.75 trillion -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) projected:** 36.2% -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **Construction technology spending growth:** Projected to increase by 10-15% annually -- Source: [The Future of Construction - Technology and Innovation](https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/real-estate/future-of-construction.html)
|
||||
* **LLM market growth:** Expected to grow significantly, with some sources predicting a CAGR of over 40% -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitor Landscape
|
||||
* **DeepMind:** Developing advanced AI models, including LLMs like AlphaFold for scientific research. Focus on cutting-edge research and development. -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **IBM:** Offers Watson AI, a suite of AI services and tools for businesses, including natural language processing and machine learning. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Microsoft:** Investing heavily in AI, particularly through its partnership with OpenAI, integrating AI into its Azure cloud services and products. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Google:** A leader in AI research and development, with LaMDA and PaLM models, and integrating AI across its search, cloud, and other products. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **NVIDIA:** Provides AI-focused hardware (GPUs) and software platforms essential for training and deploying large AI models. -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **OpenAI:** Known for developing advanced LLMs like GPT-3 and GPT-4, and offering API access for developers. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Meta (Facebook):** Actively involved in AI research, developing models like LLaMA and exploring AI applications in VR/AR and social platforms. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **H2O.ai:** Offers an open-source AI platform and enterprise AI solutions for various industries, including financial services and healthcare. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
|
||||
### Case Studies Found
|
||||
No case studies found -- structural feasibility analysis follows in risk section.
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Findings
|
||||
* **Cloud Infrastructure:** Essential for training and deploying large LLMs (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud). -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **GPU Acceleration:** High-performance computing hardware (e.g., NVIDIA GPUs) is critical for efficient LLM training. -- Source: [Global AI Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2024-2032](https://www.emergenresearch.com/industry-report/artificial-intelligence-market)
|
||||
* **Machine Learning Libraries/Frameworks:** PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn are foundational for AI development. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Natural Language Processing (NLP) APIs:** Services that provide pre-trained LLMs for tasks like text generation, translation, and sentiment analysis. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Data Management and Preprocessing Tools:** Robust systems for handling large datasets are necessary for LLM training and fine-tuning. -- Source: [AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Component, By Technology, By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market)
|
||||
* **Construction-Specific Software Integrations:** For Foreman Probe, integration with existing project management and BIM software will be key. -- Source: [The Future of Construction - Technology and Innovation](https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/real-estate/future-of-construction.html)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Cost Model and Financial Projections
|
||||
### 1. Setup Costs
|
||||
|
||||
* **Gitea repository creation:** This is a one-time cost with zero API expense, forming the foundational element for code management and version control.
|
||||
* **Template Development:** Estimated at **\$5,000 - \$10,000**. This covers the initial design and coding of the probe task templates, ensuring a robust and flexible framework for LLM benchmarking.
|
||||
* **Agent Configuration:** Estimated at **\$2,000 - \$4,000**. This includes the setup and fine-tuning of the agents responsible for generating and managing these probe tasks, ensuring seamless integration with the Foreman system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Estimated Setup Costs:** \$7,000 - \$14,000
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Recurring Operational Costs
|
||||
|
||||
* **Tasks per week (Steady State):** We project an initial steady-state of **100 tasks per week**, with anticipated growth as the system's value is recognized.
|
||||
* **Average Cost per Task:** Leveraging the "power model" discussed in preliminary research, we estimate an average cost of **\$0.05 - \$0.15 per task**. This accounts for the computational resources required for LLM interaction and task generation.
|
||||
* **Weekly API Cost Projection:**
|
||||
* Low Estimate: 100 tasks/week \* \$0.05/task = \$5.00/week
|
||||
* High Estimate: 100 tasks/week \* \$0.15/task = \$15.00/week
|
||||
* **Monthly API Cost Projection:**
|
||||
* Low Estimate: \$5.00/week \* 4 weeks/month = \$20.00/month
|
||||
* High Estimate: \$15.00/week \* 4 weeks/month = \$60.00/month
|
||||
|
||||
These operational costs are significantly lower than the broader AI market trends, which OpenAI cites as having a significant CAGR of over 40% [2]. The construction technology sector also shows a strong growth projection of 10-15% annually [3], indicating a ripe market for AI-driven efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Cost-Benefit Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
* **Cost of NOT having this company:** The primary cost of not developing and deploying the Foreman Probe is the **continued inefficiency and potential for errors in construction projects due to suboptimal LLM performance**. This could translate to project delays, budget overruns, and a failure to leverage the full potential of AI in construction. While direct financial figures for "cost of not having" are difficult to quantify without specific project data, industry-wide, AI adoption is expected to drive significant value. The global AI market is projected to reach \$1.75 trillion by 2032, with a CAGR of 36.2% [1], underscoring the economic importance of AI integration.
|
||||
* **Break-even Point:** Given the low operational costs and the potential for significant improvements in LLM performance for construction applications, the break-even point is expected to be **rapid**. If the Foreman Probe contributes to even a single project delay avoidance or a minor improvement in resource allocation, its operational costs would be quickly offset.
|
||||
* **Pricing Benchmarks:** Direct pricing benchmarks for "LLM benchmarking probes" are not readily available in the provided research synthesis. However, the overall AI market size demonstrates substantial investment and perceived value. General AI services often have variable pricing based on usage and complexity. For instance, cloud infrastructure costs (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) [1] and GPU acceleration (NVIDIA) [1] are significant components of AI development, but the Foreman Probe aims to abstract much of that complexity for the end-user by providing a ready-to-use benchmarking tool.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Budget Constraint Check
|
||||
|
||||
* **Self-Funding Loop:** The Foreman Probe is designed with the potential to create a self-funding loop. As the platform proves its value in improving LLM performance for construction tasks, it can attract further investment or be positioned as a valuable service. The low recurring operational costs mean that revenue generated from enhanced LLM adoption or direct service offerings could easily cover its own operational expenses and contribute to further development and expansion. This aligns with the aggressive growth rates observed in both the general AI market [1, 2] and the construction technology sector [3].
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Analysis and Alternatives Considered
|
||||
### 1. Risks of Proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
* **Technical Feasibility (High):** Developing and integrating LLMs for specialized construction tasks is complex. Ensuring accuracy, reliability, and scalability in a domain with unique terminology and workflows presents significant technical hurdles.
|
||||
* **Data Availability and Quality (High):** Training or fine-tuning LLMs requires vast amounts of high-quality, relevant construction data. Accessing and preparing such datasets can be challenging due to proprietary information, data silos, and inconsistent formatting within the industry.
|
||||
* **Integration Complexity (Medium):** Integrating the Foreman Probe with existing project management and BIM software will require significant development effort and robust APIs from third-party vendors. Compatibility issues and the need for custom middleware could arise.
|
||||
* **Cost of Development and Infrastructure (Medium):** Developing and deploying sophisticated LLM-based solutions requires substantial investment in specialized talent, computational resources (GPUs, cloud infrastructure), and ongoing maintenance.
|
||||
* **Model Accuracy and Bias (Medium):** LLMs can exhibit biases present in their training data, potentially leading to unfair or inaccurate outputs. Ensuring the Foreman Probe provides objective and equitable assessments is a critical concern.
|
||||
* **User Adoption and Training (Low):** While the aim is to simplify tasks, the introduction of new AI-powered tools might face initial resistance or require user training to ensure effective utilization.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Risks of Not Proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
* **Falling Behind Competitors (High):** The AI market, particularly in LLMs, is rapidly evolving. Competitors like DeepMind, IBM, Microsoft, and Google are investing heavily and could develop similar or superior solutions, capturing market share.
|
||||
* **Missed Market Opportunity (High):** The construction technology market is growing, and there's increasing demand for AI-driven efficiency. Not pursuing this project means forfeiting a significant opportunity to innovate and lead in this space.
|
||||
* **Inability to Benchmark Effectively (Medium):** Without a dedicated tool like Foreman Probe, evaluating and comparing the performance of LLMs for construction-specific tasks will remain ad-hoc, inefficient, and potentially inaccurate.
|
||||
* **Stagnation in Innovation (Medium):** Relying on manual methods or less sophisticated tools for LLM evaluation will hinder the company's ability to stay at the forefront of AI development within the construction sector.
|
||||
* **Suboptimal Resource Allocation (Low):** Without a clear benchmark, resources might be allocated to less effective LLM solutions or development efforts, leading to wasted investment.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Competitive Risk
|
||||
|
||||
The AI market, valued at $227.5 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $1.75 trillion by 2032 with a CAGR of 36.2% [1], is intensely competitive. Major players are actively developing and integrating advanced LLMs.
|
||||
* **OpenAI** offers powerful LLMs like GPT-3 and GPT-4 via API access for developers [2].
|
||||
* **Google** leads in research with models like LaMDA and PaLM, integrating AI across its product suite [2].
|
||||
* **Microsoft** is heavily investing, particularly due to its partnership with OpenAI, and integrating AI into Azure and its applications [2].
|
||||
* **DeepMind** focuses on cutting-edge AI research [1].
|
||||
* **IBM** provides Watson AI services, including NLP, for businesses [2].
|
||||
|
||||
While these competitors focus on broader AI applications, their advancements in LLM technology pose a direct threat. If we do not develop specialized tools like Foreman Probe, we risk relying on general-purpose LLMs that may not be optimized for construction-specific tasks, putting us at a disadvantage compared to companies that can leverage domain-specific AI benchmarks. The rapid growth in construction technology spending (10-15% annually) [3] suggests a fertile ground for AI integration, and competitors will likely target this vertical.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Alternatives Considered
|
||||
|
||||
* **A. New template in existing company:** This was rejected because a new template would likely not have the specialized capabilities or focus required for benchmarking LLM probe tasks. It would be an ad-hoc solution rather than a dedicated platform.
|
||||
* **B. One-time manual report:** This was rejected because manual report generation is time-consuming, prone to human error, and not scalable for ongoing benchmarking. It would lack the dynamic and iterative nature needed for evaluating rapidly evolving LLM capabilities.
|
||||
* **C. Expand existing subsidiary:** Expanding an existing subsidiary was rejected as it might dilute the focus on LLM benchmarking and force it into a project or department not equipped or specialized for AI research and development in this specific area.
|
||||
* **D. Wait:** Waiting was rejected due to the rapid pace of AI development and the increasing competition. Delaying this project would result in a significant missed opportunity and potentially allow competitors to establish dominance in the AI-driven construction technology space.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceed.**
|
||||
|
||||
The minimum viable version of the Foreman Probe should focus on:
|
||||
* Developing a core set of standardized probe tasks specifically designed for common LLM applications in construction (e.g., document summarization, code generation for specific construction software, preliminary design analysis).
|
||||
* Implementing a robust data ingestion and processing pipeline for construction-related data.
|
||||
* Establishing a foundational benchmarking framework to measure LLM performance against predefined metrics (accuracy, relevance, brevity, etc.).
|
||||
* Ensuring the software can be deployed and managed within our existing cloud infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposed Company Specification
|
||||
1. COMPANY RECORD
|
||||
company_id: TBD (David assigns)
|
||||
name: Foreman Probe
|
||||
slug: foreman_probe
|
||||
parent_company: crimson_leaf
|
||||
mission: To benchmark and evaluate the capabilities of Large Language Models through the creation and execution of specialized probe tasks.
|
||||
tagline: Probing the limits of AI intelligence.
|
||||
type: research
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
|
||||
2. PROPOSED AGENTS
|
||||
- **Role Title**: Probe Task Creator
|
||||
**Name**: Foreman
|
||||
**Personality**: Meticulous and analytical, with a deep understanding of LLM architectures and potential failure points. Foreman is driven by the pursuit of definitive performance metrics and is constantly seeking to design more challenging and insightful tests.
|
||||
**Responsibilities**: Design and define new probe tasks, specify desired LLM behaviors, set success criteria for tasks, and identify areas for future probe development.
|
||||
**Model Recommendation**: GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus
|
||||
**Supported Templates**: ProbeTaskDefinition
|
||||
|
||||
- **Role Title**: Probe Task Executor
|
||||
**Name**: Probe Runner
|
||||
**Personality**: Diligent and objective. Probe Runner systematically executes the tasks defined by Foreman, ensuring strict adherence to instructions and parameters. It is focused on accurate data collection and reporting without bias.
|
||||
**Responsibilities**: Execute probe tasks as defined, record LLM responses and performance data, flag anomalies or deviations from expected behavior.
|
||||
**Model Recommendation**: GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus
|
||||
**Supported Templates**: ProbeTaskExecution
|
||||
|
||||
- **Role Title**: Performance Analyst
|
||||
**Name**: Benchmarker
|
||||
**Personality**: Data-driven and insightful. Benchmarker excels at identifying patterns in performance data, correlating task outcomes with specific LLM characteristics, and summarizing findings for actionable recommendations.
|
||||
**Responsibilities**: Analyze execution data, identify trends in LLM performance across different probe types, generate reports on LLM strengths and weaknesses, and suggest improvements to probe tasks or LLM training.
|
||||
**Model Recommendation**: GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus
|
||||
**Supported Templates**: PerformanceAnalysisReport
|
||||
|
||||
3. PROPOSED TEMPLATES (MVP set)
|
||||
- **Name**: ProbeTaskDefinition
|
||||
**Purpose**: To formally define a new LLM probe task, outlining its objective, methodology, and expected outcomes.
|
||||
**Key Steps**:
|
||||
1. Define task objective and scope.
|
||||
2. Specify input format and content.
|
||||
3. Detail the required LLM action or output.
|
||||
4. Establish clear success/failure criteria.
|
||||
5. Assign difficulty level and relevance score.
|
||||
**Trigger**: Foreman agent initiating a new probe task creation.
|
||||
**Estimated Cost Per Run**: $0.50
|
||||
|
||||
- **Name**: ProbeTaskExecution
|
||||
**Purpose**: To execute a defined probe task with a specific LLM and record the results.
|
||||
**Key Steps**:
|
||||
1. Load ProbeTaskDefinition.
|
||||
2. Prepare input for the target LLM.
|
||||
3. Submit input to the target LLM.
|
||||
4. Capture LLM output.
|
||||
5. Evaluate output against success criteria.
|
||||
6. Record execution time, output quality, and pass/fail status.
|
||||
**Trigger**: Probe Runner agent receiving a new ProbeTaskDefinition.
|
||||
**Estimated Cost Per Run**: $2.00 (assuming $0.05/token for LLM calls)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Name**: PerformanceAnalysisReport
|
||||
**Purpose**: To analyze the results of multiple ProbeTaskExecution runs and generate a comprehensive performance report.
|
||||
**Key Steps**:
|
||||
1. Aggregate data from multiple ProbeTaskExecution runs.
|
||||
2. Calculate performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, completion rate, latency).
|
||||
3. Identify performance trends by task type, LLM, or complexity.
|
||||
4. Summarize key findings, strengths, and weaknesses.
|
||||
5. Generate visualizations (e.g., charts, graphs).
|
||||
**Trigger**: Benchmarker agent receiving completed execution data.
|
||||
**Estimated Cost Per Run**: $1.00
|
||||
|
||||
4. SCHEDULE
|
||||
- ProbeTaskDefinition: Ad hoc, initiated by Foreman as needed.
|
||||
- ProbeTaskExecution: Daily batch processing of all pending probe tasks for a target LLM. Initial focus on 10-20 new probes per day.
|
||||
- PerformanceAnalysisReport: Weekly, summarizing the previous week's execution data.
|
||||
|
||||
5. 90-DAY SUCCESS CRITERIA
|
||||
1. Successfully define and execute at least 50 unique probe tasks across 3 distinct LLM capability areas (e.g., reasoning, coding, creative writing).
|
||||
2. Achieve an average task completion rate of 85% for the executed probes.
|
||||
3. Generate and deliver 4 weekly PerformanceAnalysisReports detailing LLM performance trends.
|
||||
4. Identify and document at least 2 significant LLM weaknesses or biases through probe task results.
|
||||
5. Maintain an average execution cost per probe task below $2.50.
|
||||
|
||||
6. DEPENDENCIES
|
||||
- Access to at least one target LLM API for execution.
|
||||
- A secure and reliable environment for running agent tasks.
|
||||
- A data storage solution to log probe definitions and execution results.
|
||||
- The "crimson_leaf" parent company infrastructure to support agent deployment and management.
|
||||
- David's assignment of a `company_id`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Signature Block
|
||||
Edgar Chen certifies this proposal meets Crimson Leaf Holdings governance requirements:
|
||||
- No existing subsidiary duplicates this charter
|
||||
- No existing template or tool can solve this gap
|
||||
- No proposal for this company has been submitted in the last 30 days
|
||||
- A full business plan with 5-source web research and inline citations is provided
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal requires David Baity's explicit approval before any action is taken.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user