index: add proposal {task.id} to proposal index

This commit is contained in:
PAE
2026-05-01 21:14:17 +00:00
parent 886b4a0808
commit fe4f857324

View File

@@ -69,19 +69,24 @@ Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 8a9ad04b-b49f-4053-a063-c6fdb562927a
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in foundational probing infrastructure by establishing core models that mirror the Foreman's task-creation logic, enabling baseline assessments of LLM agentic behavior. It differs from prior proposals by prioritizing the fundamental modeling of task structures over advanced integrations, adversarial elements, or comprehensive ecosystems, providing a essential building block for subsequent specialized probes.
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in foundational probing infrastructure by establishing core models that mirror the Foreman's task-creation logic, enabling baseline assessments of LLM agentic behavior. It differs from prior proposals by prioritizing the fundamental modeling of task structures over advanced integrations, adversarial elements, or comprehensive ecosystems, providing an essential building block for subsequent specialized probes.
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 161f1a55-44e9-4859-aff4-22ce0d922d6e
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to develop a standardized methodology for generating, curating, and deploying probe tasks that simulate the Foreman's task creation process. This fills the gap in systematic LLM evaluation by creating a reproducible pipeline that mirrors the Foreman's operational logic, differing from existing proposals by focusing on the methodological foundation needed for reliable benchmarking rather than specialized test scenarios, adversarial challenges, or broader validation ecosystems.
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task fe901ff3-4b8f-4965-956e-bc0b77c0ee67
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task fe901ff3-4b8f-4965-956e-bc0c77c0ee67
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in internal performance evaluation by providing a standardized testbed, differing from the general Incubation proposal by focusing specifically on technical validation metrics for the Foreman system.
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 6711e4d7-27d5-4dba-8575-1b95eb3fd9c9
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task 31a4d0e9-245e-4fd4-b886-3a72b99a00c0
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This fills the gap in comprehensive internal benchmarking by directly simulating the Foreman's task generation for targeted LLM testing. It differs from prior proposals by emphasizing a streamlined, core modeling approach that prioritizes essential validation elements without incorporating advanced features like real-world integrations or adversarial testing.
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to model probe tasks created by the Foreman to benchmark and evaluate LLM capabilities. This proposal fills the gap in specialized LLM evaluation by creating a dedicated framework for testing Foreman-generated tasks, differing from prior proposals by focusing on the direct simulation of Foreman's output for precise performance measurement within construction contexts.
### Crimson Leaf Holdings -- Task f03f4482-796f-409a-ac73-d65556b0ce05
Date: 2026-04-29
Status: AWAITING DAVID'S APPROVAL
Summary: Proposal for the Foreman Probe project to create a baseline library of probe tasks that emulate the Foreman's task generation process. It addresses the gap in having a reusable, versioncontrolled set of benchmarks for consistent LLM evaluation, differing from earlier proposals by focusing on establishing a core repository rather than specialized or adversarial testing.