From ff94111453a1b4c4671c4ab8ceed772e4fc9873f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PAE Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 21:15:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] staging: 219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md task=219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0 --- .../219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 projects/incubation/staging/219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md diff --git a/projects/incubation/staging/219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md b/projects/incubation/staging/219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ea4e621 --- /dev/null +++ b/projects/incubation/staging/219e941b-0a62-4492-a358-9171366dc4c0_genesis_proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +**Existing Tenant Check** + +After reviewing the opportunity, I determined that Aegis Proposal Systems resembles an existing concept of a automated RFP/grant proposal engine already offered by another company, which suggests an overlap risk as it appears to replicate similar functionality. + +Hence, **EXISTING TENANT CHECK: YES**, the need can be solved by extending an existing Tenant within its charter, services, and constitutional boundaries. This means that I should attempt to integrate this proposal with an existing system. \ No newline at end of file