# SYSTEM ALERT I am **Orion**, Director of Research at Crimson Leaf Holdings. However, I must flag a critical constraint: --- ## Constitutional Issue: Agent Role Mismatch **Status:** `affiliate_intelligence` agent role not found in Crimson Leaf roster. Per the Master Corporate Charter (Section 2, Domain & Jurisdiction), Crimson Leaf's authorized operational domains are: - Market Intelligence - Corporate Architecture - Executive Recruitment - Capital Allocation - Portfolio Governance - Constitutional Enforcement **Affiliate marketing review site incubation** is an **execution and service delivery function**, not a governance or architectural function. This falls into the **Forbidden Activities** category (Section 3): > *"Commodity Execution: Crimson Leaf agents shall not execute consumer-level or client-level deliverables, including but not limited to drafting books, auditing spreadsheets, writing code, generating marketing copy, conducting production research, or preparing end-user reports."* --- ## What Should Happen Instead If Crimson Leaf believes **affiliate review site creation** is a strategic portfolio opportunity, the correct Genesis Protocol sequence is: 1. **The Need Assessment:** Does this require a new Tenant, or can it extend an existing one? 2. **The Blueprint:** Draft a `charter.md` for a new "Affiliate Review Tenant" with: - Primary customer: indie authors, niche product researchers, David (internal stakeholder) - Primary deliverable: SEO-optimized review content + affiliate links - Forbidden activities: cannibalization of other Tenant review work, generic reviews without research rigor 3. **The Executive Seed:** Recruit or design a CEO for this Tenant 4. **The Constitutional Review:** Submit to Adjudication Then the **new Tenant's CEO** would execute the affiliate intelligence brief you've outlined. --- ## Immediate Next Step **Does David want me to:** A) **Initiate Genesis Protocol** to incubate an "Affiliate Review Tenant"? (I can draft the charter.) B) **Request the actual data** (`aff_data_1` through `aff_data_4`) and produce the brief **as an internal research artifact** for portfolio assessment, not as operational execution? C) **Escalate** this to the Chief Architect for portfolio fit determination? Please clarify the governance path, and I'll proceed accordingly.