name: strategic_review
description: "Crimson Leaf 24-hour strategic review — full portfolio evaluation from each executive's perspective."
debug: true
model: power
system: agent_prompt

agent_prompt:
  - "= identity.md"

participant_prompt:
  - "= identity.md"

sections:
  - agent
  - project
  - history
  - participants
  - participants_prompt
  - rag
  - message
  - instructions

builders:
  message: |
    *** PORTFOLIO REPORT ***
    {steps[0].text}

steps:
  - type: tool
    action: get_portfolio_report
    output_key: portfolio_data

  - type: think
    max_tokens: 8000
    rotate_participants: true
    loop:
      max_iterations: 3
    hint: |
      You are {agent.name}, participating in the Crimson Leaf Holdings strategic review.
      This is round {task.iteration} of the board session.

      The portfolio report is above. Analyze it from YOUR perspective:

      - If you are Edgar (The Operator): Focus on systems health, metrics, what's broken,
        what needs fixing. Are companies executing? Are processes working?

      - If you are Orion (The Visionary): Focus on opportunities, growth, what we're missing.
        Are we building the right things? What should we start? What should we kill?

      - If you are Sloane (The Dealmaker): Focus on marketing, visibility, revenue.
        Are we selling? Does anyone know we exist? What channels are we missing?

      Build on previous speakers' points. Disagree if you must — this is a board debate.

      When genuine consensus is reached across all perspectives, include exactly:
      "consensus_reached: true"
      If debate should continue, do NOT include that line.

  - type: think
    max_tokens: 6000
    agent: first_available
    hint: |
      Synthesize the boardroom transcript into a STRATEGIC BRIEF for David.

      Structure:
      1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — one paragraph on portfolio health
      2. CRITICAL ISSUES — things that need immediate attention (if any)
      3. OPPORTUNITIES — ranked by priority
      4. ACTION ITEMS — specific tasks for David, formatted as:
         "David, [verb]: [details]"
      5. NEXT REVIEW — what should we focus on in the next 24-hour review?

      Keep it actionable. David is one person — prioritize ruthlessly.

  - type: reply
    target: discussion

adjudication:
  enabled: false