name: planning description: "Crimson Leaf executive planning — boardroom deliberation, structured task breakdown, child task dispatch." debug: true system: agent_prompt participant_prompt: - "= identity.md" agent_prompt: - "= identity.md" sections: - agent - project - history - rag - participants - participants_prompt - roster - templates - message - instructions steps: - type: think rotate_participants: true loop: max_iterations: 3 hint: | You are {agent.name}. This is round {task.iteration} of the Crimson Leaf planning session. The executive board is breaking down this initiative into a concrete work plan. Write YOUR perspective from your area of expertise: - What work streams or tasks need to exist? - What order must they happen in? What depends on what? - Which agents from the TEAM ROSTER are best suited to each piece? - What risks, gaps, or open questions do you see? - What do you agree or disagree with from prior planning rounds? CRIMSON LEAF CONTEXT: Crimson Leaf is a holding company and incubator. It does NOT produce consumer deliverables. Valid work for CL includes: market research, corporate architecture, executive recruitment, portfolio governance, charter design, template authoring, and company incubation. Reference these TASK TYPES when recommending work: hire_agent — recruit a new agent to the CL roster write_template — create or refine a PAE-Lang template create_company — incubate a new sovereign Tenant quick — short single-step response CRITICAL DISPATCH RULES: - Do NOT create planning or boardroom sub-tasks. You ARE the planning step. All deliberation happens HERE in this session, not as child tasks. - Produce ONLY actionable leaf tasks (hire_agent, write_template, create_company, quick). - For company creation: emit ONE create_company task with ALL details in the description. Do NOT split charter design, CEO recruitment, and company creation into separate tasks. The create_company template handles the full flow internally. Be specific about agent assignments — use EXACT names from the TEAM ROSTER. When the group has genuinely agreed on a complete plan, include exactly: "consensus_reached: true" If the plan still has gaps or unresolved assignments, do NOT include that line. - type: think agent: first_available hint: | Structure the team's agreed plan into a precise task list. IMPORTANT: Do NOT re-deliberate or reconsider what was agreed above. Your only job is to serialize the decisions into clean task records. For each task: - task_name: short, specific - description: full detail — enough that the assigned agent can execute without asking. CRITICAL: Include the ORIGINAL OPERATOR REQUEST verbatim in every child description so downstream agents know what was actually asked for. Start with "ORIGINAL REQUEST: " followed by specific instructions. - agents: EXACT name(s) from TEAM ROSTER - task_type: MUST be one of the valid template names listed below - priority: 1 (critical) to 5 (nice-to-have) Order tasks correctly — blockers before dependents. No ambiguous assignments. No placeholder names. VALID TASK TYPES (use ONLY these exact strings): hire_agent, write_template, create_company, quick RULES: - Do NOT emit planning or boardroom tasks. Deliberation already happened above. - For create_company: emit ONE task with the full opportunity in the description. - type: package packet_type: PlanningResponsePacket schema: tasks: - task_name: "string — short descriptive name" description: "string — full instructions for the assigned agent" agents: - "string — EXACT agent name from TEAM ROSTER" task_type: "string — MUST be a template name from the valid list" priority: "integer 1 (critical) to 5 (nice-to-have)" insert_children: true - type: close rag_update: false adjudication: enabled: false