name: design_review
description: >
  Independent review of a company design specification. Each board member
  critiques the design from their domain expertise.
model: power

sections:
  - agent
  - project
  - rag
  - deliverables
  - message
  - instructions

steps:
  - type: think
    hint: |
      You are {agent.name}.
      {agent.identity}

      You are reviewing a COMPANY DESIGN SPECIFICATION produced by the Crimson Leaf boardroom.
      The full design document is in the deliverables above.

      Your review focus area: {review_focus}

      Examine every section of the design through the lens of YOUR expertise.
      Be specific — reference exact sections, agent names, template names, or
      pipeline steps where you see issues. Generic praise or vague concerns are useless.

      The design has 10 sections: Executive Summary, Market Justification, Agent Roster,
      Chain of Command, Template Stack, Pipeline SOP, Revenue Model, Success Metrics,
      Risks & Mitigations, and Go/No-Go Decision.

      Review ALL of them, but weight your critique toward your domain.

      Structure your review as:
        1. STRENGTHS — What is solid and well-designed (cite specifics)
        2. CONCERNS — Issues ranked by severity (critical → minor)
        3. SPECIFIC CHANGES — Exact modifications you would make, with reasoning
        4. VERDICT — approve / revise / redesign — and why

  - type: reply
    target: discussion
    style: structured_review