- Orion repurposed: Chief Creative Officer -> Director of Market Intelligence - New template: market_intelligence (4-lens niche/gap analysis) - Removed: brand_audit, design_brief (commodity execution, unconstitutional) - New identity/system files reflect research + structural analysis posture - Vance: removed broken fund_tenant/allocate_resources refs; added financial_audit, retire_tenant - Silas: added write_charter to supported_templates - Sloane: added retire_tenant (DISSOLVE verdict execution) - Aris: portfolio_architectural_review (already updated) - New templates: market_intelligence, financial_audit, retire_tenant, write_charter, charter_audit, audit_tenant - Deleted 5 orphan charter templates (consolidated into write_charter): sovereign_tenant_charter, tenant_charter_drafting, tenant_charter_formalization, tenant_charter_standardization, tenant_charter_synthesis Charter domain coverage now complete: Market Intelligence -> Orion (market_intelligence) Corporate Architecture -> Aris + Silas Executive Recruitment -> Edgar (hire_agent) Capital Allocation -> Vance (capital_allocation_audit, financial_audit, retire_tenant) Portfolio Governance -> Sloane (audit_tenant, retire_tenant) + Valerius (charter_audit) Constitutional Enforcement -> Aris + Valerius (adjudicate_tenant, charter_audit) Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
121 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
121 lines
4.6 KiB
YAML
name: write_charter
|
|
description: "Silas synthesizes a formal constitutional charter for a sovereign Tenant — narrow boundaries, forbidden activities, and black-box operating mandate."
|
|
debug: true
|
|
system: agent_prompt
|
|
|
|
agent_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
|
|
skills:
|
|
- guides/CorporateCharterGuide.md
|
|
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- rag
|
|
- roster
|
|
- skills
|
|
- deliverables
|
|
- message
|
|
- rejection_feedback
|
|
- instructions
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: think
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are {agent.name}, Chief Architect of Crimson Leaf LLC.
|
|
|
|
A charter is not a document — it is constitutional law. It defines a company's right to exist,
|
|
the boundaries of that existence, and the conditions under which it forfeits that right.
|
|
|
|
Read the SKILLS & GUIDES section. The CorporateCharterGuide.md defines every required section
|
|
and the quality standard each must meet. Follow it exactly.
|
|
|
|
Design the charter for the proposed Tenant using this strict sequence:
|
|
|
|
1. MISSION STATEMENT (must be hyper-specific)
|
|
Who does this company serve?
|
|
What exact problem does it solve?
|
|
What is the one thing it does that no other Tenant does?
|
|
|
|
2. DOMAIN & JURISDICTION (authorized operational areas only)
|
|
List every authorized domain with a bold label and one-sentence description.
|
|
If you cannot define the boundary, the company is not ready to be chartered.
|
|
|
|
3. FORBIDDEN ACTIVITIES (hard constraints — minimum 5)
|
|
What must this company never do?
|
|
What adjacent activities would cause portfolio overlap or constitutional drift?
|
|
What commodity execution is outside its mandate?
|
|
|
|
4. CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES (actionable constraints, not aspirational statements)
|
|
What design principles govern every decision this CEO makes?
|
|
Each principle must be testable — it must be possible to verify compliance.
|
|
|
|
5. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
|
|
What is the step-by-step workflow for this company's core function?
|
|
This must map to the actual templates the company will use.
|
|
|
|
6. CONSTITUTIONAL ENFORCEMENT
|
|
How is this charter enforced?
|
|
What is the adjudication threshold for this company's deliverables?
|
|
|
|
7. SERVICE BOUNDARY
|
|
What is offered as a B2B service? What is out of scope?
|
|
Distinguish clearly: Service (deliberative, multi-agent) vs Tool (deterministic, programmatic).
|
|
|
|
8. FINANCIAL MANDATE
|
|
Seed budget governance rules.
|
|
Follow-on investment conditions.
|
|
Dormancy trigger conditions.
|
|
|
|
9. CEO AUTHORITY
|
|
What specific action types is the CEO authorized to execute?
|
|
What is explicitly outside CEO authority?
|
|
|
|
10. AMENDMENT STANDARD
|
|
Under what conditions can this charter be amended?
|
|
Elevated adjudication threshold required.
|
|
|
|
QUALITY TEST before finalizing:
|
|
- Is the mission statement something only THIS company could have?
|
|
- Do the forbidden activities create a clean separation from every other Tenant in the portfolio?
|
|
- Would the adjudicator be able to use this charter to evaluate any deliverable unambiguously?
|
|
|
|
- type: document
|
|
filename: charter
|
|
|
|
- type: package
|
|
packet_type: CharterPackage
|
|
hint: |
|
|
Serialize the charter. The charter_md must be complete, properly formatted markdown.
|
|
Do not summarize or truncate — a partial charter is worse than no charter.
|
|
schema:
|
|
actions:
|
|
- type: quick
|
|
company_slug: "string — the Tenant this charter governs"
|
|
charter_version: "string — e.g. 1.0"
|
|
charter_md: "string — complete markdown content of the charter"
|
|
constitutional_summary: "string — two-sentence summary of what this company is and is not"
|
|
adjudication_threshold: "integer — recommended pass threshold for this company's deliverables"
|
|
|
|
- type: close
|
|
rag_update: true
|
|
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: true
|
|
pass_threshold: 90
|
|
deliverable_type: coordination
|
|
criteria:
|
|
completeness:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "All 10 required charter sections are present and substantive — no placeholders"
|
|
specificity:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Mission and domain are hyper-specific — not generalist descriptions that could apply to any company"
|
|
enforcement_clarity:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Forbidden activities and constitutional principles are concrete enough to adjudicate against"
|
|
black_box_integrity:
|
|
weight: 25
|
|
description: "Company can operate as a sovereign unit — clear input/output boundary with no recursive loops"
|