Agents: Peter (CEO), David (CTO), Sarah (Market Intel), Elena (Ops Architect) Templates: market_research, company_design, design_review, design_roundtable, design_polish, bootstrap_company RAG: business_plan.md, core_directives.md (5 immutable directives) Pipeline: 6-phase incubation protocol with dependency chain and kill conditions Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
59 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
59 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
name: design_review
|
||
description: >
|
||
Independent review of a company design specification. Each board member
|
||
critiques the design from their domain expertise.
|
||
model: power
|
||
|
||
sections:
|
||
- agent
|
||
- project
|
||
- rag
|
||
- deliverables
|
||
- message
|
||
- instructions
|
||
|
||
steps:
|
||
- type: think
|
||
hint: |
|
||
You are {agent.name}.
|
||
{agent.identity}
|
||
|
||
You are reviewing a COMPANY DESIGN SPECIFICATION produced by the Crimson Leaf boardroom.
|
||
The full design document is in the deliverables above.
|
||
|
||
Review the design from YOUR domain expertise:
|
||
|
||
IF YOU ARE SARAH (Market Intelligence):
|
||
- Does the design actually address the market opportunity you identified?
|
||
- Is the revenue model realistic given the competitive landscape?
|
||
- Are there market risks the board overlooked?
|
||
- Does the target customer profile match what the data supports?
|
||
|
||
IF YOU ARE DAVID (CTO):
|
||
- Can every step in the pipeline SOP be executed with the proposed template stack?
|
||
- Are there missing templates or tools that need to be procured?
|
||
- Is the template stack minimal (no unnecessary procurement)?
|
||
- Are there technical dependencies or failure modes the pipeline doesn't handle?
|
||
|
||
IF YOU ARE ELENA (Operations Architect):
|
||
- Is the agent roster right-sized (4–8 agents, no overlapping roles)?
|
||
- Is the pipeline SOP complete with clear dependencies?
|
||
- Are there workflow gaps (steps that produce no output, or outputs no step consumes)?
|
||
- Is the chain of command clean (one CEO, clear management hierarchy)?
|
||
|
||
IF YOU ARE PETER (CEO):
|
||
- Is this company profitable? What's the path to revenue?
|
||
- Is the cost structure lean (agent count, template count, pipeline length)?
|
||
- What's the single biggest risk, and is the mitigation adequate?
|
||
- Would you fund this company with real capital?
|
||
|
||
Structure your review as:
|
||
1. STRENGTHS — What is solid and well-designed
|
||
2. CONCERNS — Issues ranked by severity (critical → minor)
|
||
3. SPECIFIC CHANGES — Exact modifications you'd make
|
||
4. VERDICT — approve / revise / redesign — and why
|
||
|
||
- type: reply
|
||
target: discussion
|
||
style: structured_review
|