80 lines
2.3 KiB
YAML
80 lines
2.3 KiB
YAML
name: strategic_review
|
|
description: "Crimson Leaf 24-hour strategic review — full portfolio evaluation from each executive's perspective."
|
|
debug: true
|
|
model: power
|
|
system: agent_prompt
|
|
|
|
agent_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
|
|
participant_prompt:
|
|
- "= identity.md"
|
|
|
|
sections:
|
|
- agent
|
|
- project
|
|
- history
|
|
- participants
|
|
- participants_prompt
|
|
- rag
|
|
- message
|
|
- instructions
|
|
|
|
builders:
|
|
message: |
|
|
*** PORTFOLIO REPORT ***
|
|
{steps[0].text}
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
- type: tool
|
|
action: get_portfolio_report
|
|
output_key: portfolio_data
|
|
|
|
- type: think
|
|
max_tokens: 8000
|
|
rotate_participants: true
|
|
loop:
|
|
max_iterations: 3
|
|
hint: |
|
|
You are {agent.name}, participating in the Crimson Leaf Holdings strategic review.
|
|
This is round {task.iteration} of the board session.
|
|
|
|
The portfolio report is above. Analyze it from YOUR perspective:
|
|
|
|
- If you are Edgar (The Operator): Focus on systems health, metrics, what's broken,
|
|
what needs fixing. Are companies executing? Are processes working?
|
|
|
|
- If you are Orion (The Visionary): Focus on opportunities, growth, what we're missing.
|
|
Are we building the right things? What should we start? What should we kill?
|
|
|
|
- If you are Sloane (The Dealmaker): Focus on marketing, visibility, revenue.
|
|
Are we selling? Does anyone know we exist? What channels are we missing?
|
|
|
|
Build on previous speakers' points. Disagree if you must — this is a board debate.
|
|
|
|
When genuine consensus is reached across all perspectives, include exactly:
|
|
"consensus_reached: true"
|
|
If debate should continue, do NOT include that line.
|
|
|
|
- type: think
|
|
max_tokens: 6000
|
|
agent: first_available
|
|
hint: |
|
|
Synthesize the boardroom transcript into a STRATEGIC BRIEF for David.
|
|
|
|
Structure:
|
|
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — one paragraph on portfolio health
|
|
2. CRITICAL ISSUES — things that need immediate attention (if any)
|
|
3. OPPORTUNITIES — ranked by priority
|
|
4. ACTION ITEMS — specific tasks for David, formatted as:
|
|
"David, [verb]: [details]"
|
|
5. NEXT REVIEW — what should we focus on in the next 24-hour review?
|
|
|
|
Keep it actionable. David is one person — prioritize ruthlessly.
|
|
|
|
- type: reply
|
|
target: discussion
|
|
|
|
adjudication:
|
|
enabled: false
|