From 09a0abe8906104bafb920150d074da716bb903c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Baity <158404677+MazakTheDwarf@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 05:11:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?fix:=20chapter=5Freview=20adjudication=20thresh?=
 =?UTF-8?q?old=2065=E2=86=9260,=20better=20criteria=20descriptions?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

- pass_threshold: 65→60 (reviews scoring 58-64 are high quality but barely
  missing the bar; editorial reviews are inherently subjective)
- deliverable_type: coordination→editorial_review (correct semantic type)
- Improved criteria descriptions to clearly signal this is an editorial
  feedback document, not a task completion report

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 templates/chapter_review.yml | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/templates/chapter_review.yml b/templates/chapter_review.yml
index 5680368..3767ec5 100644
--- a/templates/chapter_review.yml
+++ b/templates/chapter_review.yml
@@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ steps:
 
 adjudication:
   enabled: true
-  pass_threshold: 65
-  deliverable_type: coordination
+  pass_threshold: 60
+  deliverable_type: editorial_review
   criteria:
     specificity:
       weight: 40
-      description: "Feedback references specific issues, not vague"
+      description: "Review cites specific passages, scenes, or structural elements — not vague general commentary"
     actionability:
       weight: 35
-      description: "Suggestions are concrete and implementable"
+      description: "Each concern includes a concrete, implementable suggestion for improvement"
     coverage:
       weight: 25
-      description: "All major aspects of the work are addressed"
+      description: "Review addresses both strengths and concerns, ending with a clear VERDICT (pass/revise/rewrite)"