From a2e0b321aeb64885c51da8e28ccc296bb14251c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PAE Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:54:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Adjudication: Task cf448623-064f-4145-b3cf-f0f92027ebf2 --- the-hollow-crown/rag/project.rag.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/the-hollow-crown/rag/project.rag.md b/the-hollow-crown/rag/project.rag.md index c2b765d..d3f2909 100644 --- a/the-hollow-crown/rag/project.rag.md +++ b/the-hollow-crown/rag/project.rag.md @@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ - Editorial roundtable debates on narrative elements (e.g., voice consistency) are gated behind parallel individual reviewer tasks for structural, thematic, and stylistic analysis. - • The Hollow Crown's editorial workflow mandates three parallel review tasks (developmental, line, continuity) before a dependent roundtable debate on elements like narrative voice consistency. - Editorial workflow for novel chapters requires sequential reviews by structure (Devon), line (Lane), and continuity (Cora) specialists before roundtable debate, ensuring narrative voice and power system coherence. +- Multi-agent editorial pipeline sequences individual specialized reviews before roundtable consensus, with task dependencies enforcing order.