Sprint 70: enforce sequential polish order via chapter_ref_prev depends_on
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,124 +1,126 @@
|
||||
name: chapter_roundtable
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Editorial roundtable — available editors debate the chapter in 2–3 structured rounds.
|
||||
Each round, each participant responds to the others' most recent positions.
|
||||
The output is a categorized consensus (MUST APPLY / OPTIONAL / PRESERVE) for the
|
||||
bounded editorial polish step.
|
||||
|
||||
debug: true
|
||||
rag_exclude: [business_plan, charter]
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
participant_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
iteration_limit: 3
|
||||
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- deliverables
|
||||
- participants
|
||||
- participants_prompt
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
rotate_participants: true
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
max_iterations: 5
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
You are {agent.name}, an editor in the editorial roundtable for this chapter.
|
||||
{agent.identity}
|
||||
|
||||
CHAPTER REFERENCE: {chapter_ref}
|
||||
GENRE: {genre_name} | AUDIENCE: {genre_audience}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
CHAPTER TEXT:
|
||||
{chapter_text}
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Round {task.iteration} of the editorial debate.
|
||||
|
||||
Read the chapter carefully from your editorial perspective.
|
||||
React to what other editors have written in prior rounds above.
|
||||
Where you agree, say so clearly. Where you disagree, argue your position
|
||||
with QUOTED EVIDENCE from the text -- do not make claims about the prose
|
||||
without quoting the specific passage you are referring to.
|
||||
If you have changed your mind, say so and quote what changed it.
|
||||
|
||||
Cover the areas most relevant to your role:
|
||||
- Story structure and pacing
|
||||
- Character voice and consistency -- if character_profiles is populated below,
|
||||
check each speaking character against their voice constraints and quote any
|
||||
violations you find
|
||||
{character_profiles}
|
||||
- Line-level clarity and prose quality
|
||||
- Continuity with prior chapters and world rules
|
||||
|
||||
Before calling CONSENSUS REACHED, ensure the group has resolved any disagreements.
|
||||
If two editors disagree on whether a change is required (one says MUST, one says optional),
|
||||
the MUST position prevails unless the other editor can argue it would damage the chapter.
|
||||
The polish step cannot reconcile unresolved debate — resolve it here.
|
||||
|
||||
When the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
|
||||
end your response with this EXACT block — no variations, no paraphrasing:
|
||||
|
||||
CONSENSUS REACHED
|
||||
CRITIQUE: [One concise paragraph summarizing the full editorial consensus]
|
||||
MUST APPLY:
|
||||
- [Must-fix item 1 — continuity error, clarity issue, or structural problem only]
|
||||
- [Must-fix item 2 — if applicable]
|
||||
OPTIONAL (only if explicitly agreed by majority as low-risk):
|
||||
- [Optional craft suggestion — clearly labeled, not required]
|
||||
PRESERVE:
|
||||
- [Strength or intentional voice choice that must NOT be changed]
|
||||
- [Additional preserve item if applicable]
|
||||
VERDICT: [PASS / REVISE]
|
||||
|
||||
VERDICT rules:
|
||||
- PASS: no MUST APPLY items remain after the debate
|
||||
- REVISE: one or more MUST APPLY items require correction
|
||||
- Do NOT use REWRITE as a verdict — the polish step is surgical, not a rebuild.
|
||||
If the chapter is so broken that only a full rewrite would fix it, flag that in CRITIQUE
|
||||
and set VERDICT to REVISE so the polish step addresses what it can.
|
||||
|
||||
Once any participant outputs CONSENSUS REACHED, the debate is over.
|
||||
Do NOT continue to another round after CONSENSUS REACHED has been written.
|
||||
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
consensus_critique: string
|
||||
chapter_verdict: string
|
||||
key_changes: string
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Extract the consensus fields from the CONSENSUS REACHED block above.
|
||||
- consensus_critique: the full CRITIQUE paragraph
|
||||
- chapter_verdict: PASS or REVISE (never REWRITE)
|
||||
- key_changes: the complete MUST APPLY section as a single string, including any
|
||||
OPTIONAL items that were agreed upon and any PRESERVE notes, clearly labeled.
|
||||
This field is the full contract for chapter_polish — include all sections.
|
||||
spawn:
|
||||
- task_type: chapter_polish
|
||||
task_name: "Polish: {chapter_ref}"
|
||||
agent_name: Iris
|
||||
context:
|
||||
chapter_text: "{chapter_text}"
|
||||
consensus_critique: "{consensus_critique}"
|
||||
key_changes: "{key_changes}"
|
||||
chapter_verdict: "{chapter_verdict}"
|
||||
genre_name: "{genre_name}"
|
||||
genre_audience: "{genre_audience}"
|
||||
chapter_ref: "{chapter_ref}"
|
||||
chapter_number: "{chapter_number}"
|
||||
chapter_target_words: "{chapter_target_words}"
|
||||
character_profiles: "{character_profiles}"
|
||||
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: false
|
||||
name: chapter_roundtable
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Editorial roundtable — available editors debate the chapter in 2–3 structured rounds.
|
||||
Each round, each participant responds to the others' most recent positions.
|
||||
The output is a categorized consensus (MUST APPLY / OPTIONAL / PRESERVE) for the
|
||||
bounded editorial polish step.
|
||||
|
||||
debug: true
|
||||
rag_exclude: [business_plan, charter]
|
||||
system: agent_prompt
|
||||
|
||||
agent_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
participant_prompt:
|
||||
- "= identity.md"
|
||||
|
||||
iteration_limit: 3
|
||||
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"
|
||||
|
||||
sections:
|
||||
- agent
|
||||
- project
|
||||
- deliverables
|
||||
- participants
|
||||
- participants_prompt
|
||||
- message
|
||||
- instructions
|
||||
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- type: think
|
||||
rotate_participants: true
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
max_iterations: 5
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
You are {agent.name}, an editor in the editorial roundtable for this chapter.
|
||||
{agent.identity}
|
||||
|
||||
CHAPTER REFERENCE: {chapter_ref}
|
||||
GENRE: {genre_name} | AUDIENCE: {genre_audience}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
CHAPTER TEXT:
|
||||
{chapter_text}
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Round {task.iteration} of the editorial debate.
|
||||
|
||||
Read the chapter carefully from your editorial perspective.
|
||||
React to what other editors have written in prior rounds above.
|
||||
Where you agree, say so clearly. Where you disagree, argue your position
|
||||
with QUOTED EVIDENCE from the text -- do not make claims about the prose
|
||||
without quoting the specific passage you are referring to.
|
||||
If you have changed your mind, say so and quote what changed it.
|
||||
|
||||
Cover the areas most relevant to your role:
|
||||
- Story structure and pacing
|
||||
- Character voice and consistency -- if character_profiles is populated below,
|
||||
check each speaking character against their voice constraints and quote any
|
||||
violations you find
|
||||
{character_profiles}
|
||||
- Line-level clarity and prose quality
|
||||
- Continuity with prior chapters and world rules
|
||||
|
||||
Before calling CONSENSUS REACHED, ensure the group has resolved any disagreements.
|
||||
If two editors disagree on whether a change is required (one says MUST, one says optional),
|
||||
the MUST position prevails unless the other editor can argue it would damage the chapter.
|
||||
The polish step cannot reconcile unresolved debate — resolve it here.
|
||||
|
||||
When the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
|
||||
end your response with this EXACT block — no variations, no paraphrasing:
|
||||
|
||||
CONSENSUS REACHED
|
||||
CRITIQUE: [One concise paragraph summarizing the full editorial consensus]
|
||||
MUST APPLY:
|
||||
- [Must-fix item 1 — continuity error, clarity issue, or structural problem only]
|
||||
- [Must-fix item 2 — if applicable]
|
||||
OPTIONAL (only if explicitly agreed by majority as low-risk):
|
||||
- [Optional craft suggestion — clearly labeled, not required]
|
||||
PRESERVE:
|
||||
- [Strength or intentional voice choice that must NOT be changed]
|
||||
- [Additional preserve item if applicable]
|
||||
VERDICT: [PASS / REVISE]
|
||||
|
||||
VERDICT rules:
|
||||
- PASS: no MUST APPLY items remain after the debate
|
||||
- REVISE: one or more MUST APPLY items require correction
|
||||
- Do NOT use REWRITE as a verdict — the polish step is surgical, not a rebuild.
|
||||
If the chapter is so broken that only a full rewrite would fix it, flag that in CRITIQUE
|
||||
and set VERDICT to REVISE so the polish step addresses what it can.
|
||||
|
||||
Once any participant outputs CONSENSUS REACHED, the debate is over.
|
||||
Do NOT continue to another round after CONSENSUS REACHED has been written.
|
||||
|
||||
- type: package
|
||||
schema:
|
||||
consensus_critique: string
|
||||
chapter_verdict: string
|
||||
key_changes: string
|
||||
hint: |
|
||||
Extract the consensus fields from the CONSENSUS REACHED block above.
|
||||
- consensus_critique: the full CRITIQUE paragraph
|
||||
- chapter_verdict: PASS or REVISE (never REWRITE)
|
||||
- key_changes: the complete MUST APPLY section as a single string, including any
|
||||
OPTIONAL items that were agreed upon and any PRESERVE notes, clearly labeled.
|
||||
This field is the full contract for chapter_polish — include all sections.
|
||||
spawn:
|
||||
- task_type: chapter_polish
|
||||
task_name: "Polish: {chapter_ref}"
|
||||
agent_name: Iris
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- "Polish: {chapter_ref_prev}"
|
||||
context:
|
||||
chapter_text: "{chapter_text}"
|
||||
consensus_critique: "{consensus_critique}"
|
||||
key_changes: "{key_changes}"
|
||||
chapter_verdict: "{chapter_verdict}"
|
||||
genre_name: "{genre_name}"
|
||||
genre_audience: "{genre_audience}"
|
||||
chapter_ref: "{chapter_ref}"
|
||||
chapter_number: "{chapter_number}"
|
||||
chapter_target_words: "{chapter_target_words}"
|
||||
character_profiles: "{character_profiles}"
|
||||
|
||||
adjudication:
|
||||
enabled: false
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user