name: chapter_roundtable
description: >
  Editorial roundtable — available editors debate the chapter in 2–3 structured rounds.
  Each round, each participant responds to the others' most recent positions.
  The output is a consensus critique (or documented disagreement) for the polish step.

debug: true
system: agent_prompt

agent_prompt:
  - "= identity.md"

skills:
  - guides/YAFictionGuide.md
  - guides/RomanceFictionGuide.md
  - guides/SciFiFictionGuide.md

participant_prompt:
  - "= identity.md"

iteration_limit: 3
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"

sections:
  - agent
  - project
  - participants
  - participants_prompt
  - skills
  - message
  - instructions

steps:
  - type: think
    rotate_participants: true
    loop:
      max_iterations: 5
    hint: |
      You are {agent.name}, an editor in the editorial roundtable for this chapter.
      {agent.identity}

      CHAPTER REFERENCE: {chapter_ref}
      GENRE: {genre_name}  |  AUDIENCE: {genre_audience}

      ---
      CHAPTER TEXT:
      {chapter_text}
      ---

      Round {task.iteration} of the editorial debate.

      Read the chapter carefully from your editorial perspective.
      React to what other editors have written in prior rounds above.
      Where you agree, say so clearly. Where you disagree, argue your position
      with evidence from the text. If you have changed your mind, say so.

      Cover the areas most relevant to your role:
        - Story structure and pacing
        - Character voice and consistency
        - Line-level clarity and prose quality
        - Continuity with prior chapters and world rules

      If the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
      end your response with this EXACT block — no variations, no paraphrasing:

      CONSENSUS REACHED
      CRITIQUE: [One concise paragraph summarizing the full editorial consensus]
      KEY CHANGES:
      - [Specific change 1]
      - [Specific change 2]
      - [Specific change 3 if needed]
      VERDICT: [PASS / REVISE / REWRITE]

      Once any participant outputs CONSENSUS REACHED, the debate is over.
      Do NOT continue to another round after CONSENSUS REACHED has been written.

  - type: package
    schema:
      consensus_critique: string
      chapter_verdict: string
      key_changes: string
    spawn:
      - task_type: chapter_polish
        task_name: "Polish: {chapter_ref}"
        agent_name: Iris
        context:
          chapter_text: "{chapter_text}"
          consensus_critique: "{consensus_critique}"
          key_changes: "{key_changes}"
          chapter_verdict: "{chapter_verdict}"
          genre_name: "{genre_name}"
          genre_audience: "{genre_audience}"
          chapter_ref: "{chapter_ref}"

adjudication:
  enabled: true
  pass_threshold: 60
  deliverable_type: coordination
  criteria:
    completeness:
      weight: 40
      description: "All viewpoints and concerns addressed"
    consensus_clarity:
      weight: 35
      description: "Clear outcome or decision documented"
    actionability:
      weight: 25
      description: "Next steps are concrete and assignable"