name: chapter_roundtable
description: >
  Three editors debate the chapter reviews in 2–3 structured rounds.
  Each round, each editor responds to the others' most recent positions.
  The output is a consensus critique (or documented disagreement) for the polish step.

debug: true

requires:
  - chapter_text
  - chapter_ref
  - genre_name
  - genre_audience

participants:
  - Devon
  - Lane
  - Cora

iteration_limit: 3
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"

steps:
  - type: think
    rotate_participants: true
    loop:
      max_iterations: 3
    hint: |
      You are {agent.name}.
      {agent.identity}

      CHAPTER: {task.message}
      GENRE: {genre_name}  AUDIENCE: {genre_audience}

      ---
      YOUR REVIEW:
      {this_agent_review}

      OTHER REVIEWS:
      [Devon] {devon_review}
      [Lane]  {lane_review}
      [Cora]  {cora_review}
      ---

      Round {task.iteration} of the editorial debate.

      Respond to the other editors' most important points.
      Where you agree, say so clearly. Where you disagree, argue your position
      with evidence from the text. If you have changed your mind, say so.

      If the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
      end your response with: CONSENSUS REACHED

  - type: package
    schema:
      consensus_critique: string
      chapter_verdict: string
      devon_final: string
      lane_final: string
      cora_final: string
      key_changes: list
    spawn:
      - task_type: chapter_polish
        task_name: "Polish: {chapter_ref}"
        agent_name: Iris
        context:
          chapter_text: "{chapter_text}"
          consensus_critique: "{consensus_critique}"
          key_changes: "{key_changes}"
          chapter_verdict: "{chapter_verdict}"
          devon_final: "{devon_final}"
          lane_final: "{lane_final}"
          cora_final: "{cora_final}"
          genre_name: "{genre_name}"
          genre_audience: "{genre_audience}"
          chapter_ref: "{chapter_ref}"

adjudication:
  enabled: true
  pass_threshold: 60
  deliverable_type: coordination
  criteria:
    completeness:
      weight: 40
      description: "All viewpoints and concerns addressed"
    consensus_clarity:
      weight: 35
      description: "Clear outcome or decision documented"
    actionability:
      weight: 25
      description: "Next steps are concrete and assignable"