- Chapter drafts must be preceded by a mandatory 'PASS 0 — BIBLE & CONTINUITY CHECK' documenting protagonist details, world rules, chapter summary, emotional beat, closing hook, and prior chapter ending.
- Standard Practice: Initiate novel chapters with a Bible & Continuity Check, followed by a detailed Chapter Plan specifying POV, first line, emotional arc, and closing hook.
- Policy: Spawn three specialized editorial review tasks (developmental, line, continuity) immediately after chapter creation, followed by a dependent roundtable consensus task, prior to polish.
- Standard Practice: Each fiction chapter begins with a Bible & Continuity Check, including outline/character bible review, previous chapter ending quote, and detailed chapter planning (POV, first line, emotional arc, goal).
- Standard Practice: Lead author drafts chapter and spawns three specialized editorial review tasks (Structural, Prose, Character) with a dependent Roundtable synthesis before polish.
- Standard Practice: Precede each novel chapter with a Bible & Continuity Check and detailed Chapter Plan.
- Policy: Lead authors produce raw chapters and immediately spawn parallel editorial review tasks for three specialized editors (developmental, line, continuity) plus roundtable debate before final polish.
- Spawn three specialized editorial review tasks (emotional arc/pacing, prose/imagery, character voice/dialogue) with distinct focuses, followed by a dependent roundtable debate task, prior to polish step.
- Chapter editorial reviews precede roundtable debates, with assignments as follows: Devon (developmental/structural), Lane (line/stylistic), Cora (continuity/thematic).
- Initiate editorial pipeline for novel chapters by spawning three specialized reviewers (developmental, line, continuity) followed by a consensus roundtable debate prior to polish.
- Standard Practice: Editorial reviews for chapters assign specialized focuses—Devon (developmental), Lane (line editing), Cora (continuity)—prior to roundtable debate.
- Policy: Initiate chapter editorial process by creating three specialized review tasks (developmental/structure, line edits, continuity) assigned to independent editors (Devon, Lane, Cora), followed by dependent roundtable debate for consensus.
- Standard Practice: Simulate boardroom debates on narrative voice and power system consistency by spawning three parallel chapter review tasks (developmental/narrative by Devon, line/prose by Lane, continuity/worldbuilding by Cora) dependent on a synthesizing roundtable task.
- Standard Practice: Chapter editorial reviews require three specialized agents—Devon (developmental), Lane (line), Cora (continuity)—with a dependent roundtable debate before consensus.