1f811e98e1
- planning.yml: roster-driven task types, no hardcoded agent names or generic types - chapter_roundtable.yml: removed fixed [Devon,Lane,Cora] participant list, any editor can join - book_chapter.yml: removed hardcoded agents from roundtable spawn - book_research.yml: removed agent: Atlas from book_outline spawn (Bouncer routes by type) - ai_article_research.yml: removed agent_name: Atlas from plan spawn - book_editorial.yml: removed Shadow Heir/Elara/Kai/Alpha Publishing/Wattpad hardcoding - project_index.yml: removed Wattpad reference - ai_article_write.yml: fixed adjudication criteria (article, not fiction chapter) - chapter_review.yml: reply→document so reviews are committed and accessible Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
123 lines
4.5 KiB
YAML
123 lines
4.5 KiB
YAML
name: book_editorial
|
||
description: "Editorial boardroom — agents review the full manuscript, debate quality, and produce written editorial notes."
|
||
debug: true
|
||
system: agent_prompt
|
||
|
||
agent_prompt:
|
||
- "= identity.md"
|
||
- "agent.rag.json"
|
||
|
||
participant_prompt:
|
||
- "= identity.md"
|
||
|
||
sections:
|
||
- agent
|
||
- project
|
||
- history
|
||
- rag
|
||
- deliverables
|
||
- participants
|
||
- participants_prompt
|
||
- message
|
||
- rejection_feedback
|
||
- instructions
|
||
|
||
steps:
|
||
- type: think
|
||
rotate_participants: true
|
||
loop:
|
||
max_iterations: 3
|
||
hint: |
|
||
You are {agent.name}. This is the editorial review boardroom for the manuscript.
|
||
|
||
TASK: Review all completed chapters (look in PROJECT DELIVERABLES — files named
|
||
"final-chapter-*.md"). Read them carefully as a professional editor would.
|
||
|
||
For each round, discuss:
|
||
1. CONTINUITY — Does each chapter open by continuing the previous chapter's cliffhanger?
|
||
Quote specific chapter-to-chapter handoffs that work well or need repair.
|
||
2. CHARACTER VOICE — Are POV voices distinct across chapters?
|
||
Call out any chapters where the voice felt off.
|
||
3. WATTPAD HOOKS — Do chapters open with a strong hook that stops a teen scrolling?
|
||
Which openings are weakest and need a rewrite?
|
||
4. PACING — Any chapters that drag or that rush past important emotional beats?
|
||
5. CLIFFHANGERS — Which chapter endings are strong? Which are weak or generic?
|
||
6. SERIES HOOK — Does the final chapter end in a way that makes readers desperate for the next book?
|
||
|
||
Speak in your own professional voice. Debate. Challenge each other.
|
||
When the editorial team has reached consensus on the manuscript's strengths and
|
||
key revision priorities, include exactly: "consensus_reached: true"
|
||
|
||
- type: think
|
||
hint: |
|
||
You are the lead editor synthesizing the boardroom transcript into formal editorial notes.
|
||
|
||
Write a professional EDITORIAL REPORT for the manuscript covering:
|
||
|
||
## Editorial Report: {project.name}
|
||
### {project.company} | Lead Author: {project.lead_author}
|
||
|
||
**OVERALL ASSESSMENT**
|
||
(1-2 paragraphs on the manuscript's readiness for publication)
|
||
|
||
**STRENGTHS** (specific, with chapter references)
|
||
**REVISION PRIORITIES** (ranked 1–5, most critical first)
|
||
- For each: what the issue is, which chapters are affected, suggested fix
|
||
**CONTINUITY CHECK** (chapter-by-chapter handoff assessment)
|
||
**CHARACTER VOICE CONSISTENCY** (POV analysis across chapters)
|
||
**PUBLICATION READINESS SCORE** (out of 10, with reasoning)
|
||
**RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS** (in order of priority)
|
||
|
||
- type: document
|
||
filename: "{{task_name_slug}}"
|
||
|
||
- type: package
|
||
packet_type: IntakeResponse
|
||
hint: |
|
||
You are the Project Manager. The editorial report above lists REVISION PRIORITIES ranked 1–5.
|
||
Convert each revision priority into a sequential create_task action for Iris.
|
||
After all revision tasks, add ONE final task to compile the project index.
|
||
|
||
Rules for revision tasks:
|
||
- One action per revision priority (up to 5)
|
||
- task_name format: "Revise: [short issue name]" (e.g., "Revise: POV Handoff Bridges")
|
||
- agent_name: "Iris"
|
||
- task_type: "book_chapter"
|
||
- description: Include the specific issue, affected chapters, and suggested fix from the editorial report.
|
||
Start with: "EDITORIAL REVISION — [Priority N]: [issue]. Affected chapters: [chapters]. Fix: [fix]."
|
||
- depends_on: the exact task_name of the PREVIOUS revision task (empty string for the first revision)
|
||
|
||
Final task (always add this LAST):
|
||
- task_name: "Compile Project Index"
|
||
- agent_name: "Nova"
|
||
- task_type: "project_index"
|
||
- description: "Compile the final MANUSCRIPT-README.md index of all project deliverables, revisions, and publication status."
|
||
- depends_on: the exact task_name of the LAST revision task
|
||
|
||
schema:
|
||
actions:
|
||
- type: create_task
|
||
task_name: "string"
|
||
agent_name: "string"
|
||
task_type: "string"
|
||
description: "string"
|
||
depends_on: "string"
|
||
|
||
- type: close
|
||
rag_update: true
|
||
|
||
adjudication:
|
||
enabled: true
|
||
pass_threshold: 65
|
||
deliverable_type: coordination
|
||
criteria:
|
||
specificity:
|
||
weight: 40
|
||
description: "Feedback references specific issues, not vague"
|
||
actionability:
|
||
weight: 35
|
||
description: "Suggestions are concrete and implementable"
|
||
coverage:
|
||
weight: 25
|
||
description: "All major aspects of the work are addressed"
|