Files
crimson_leaf_publishing/templates/chapter_roundtable.yml
David Baity 6c39789f94 Fix: add agent_name to roundtable and polish spawns
- book_chapter.yml: spawn Roundtable task with agent_name: Devon
  (dispatcher requires at least one agent; Devon chairs the roundtable
  while rotate_participants still drafts all available editors)
- chapter_roundtable.yml: spawn Polish task with agent_name: Iris
  (Iris is the designated chapter polish author)

Previously: dispatch_create_task_skipped reason=no_agent for both tasks.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-12 02:54:12 -04:00

88 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

name: chapter_roundtable
description: >
Editorial roundtable — available editors debate the chapter in 23 structured rounds.
Each round, each participant responds to the others' most recent positions.
The output is a consensus critique (or documented disagreement) for the polish step.
debug: true
participant_prompt:
- "= identity.md"
iteration_limit: 3
convergence_signal: "CONSENSUS REACHED"
sections:
- agent
- project
- participants
- participants_prompt
- message
- instructions
steps:
- type: think
rotate_participants: true
loop:
max_iterations: 3
hint: |
You are {agent.name}, an editor in the editorial roundtable for this chapter.
{agent.identity}
CHAPTER REFERENCE: {chapter_ref}
GENRE: {genre_name} | AUDIENCE: {genre_audience}
---
CHAPTER TEXT:
{chapter_text}
---
Round {task.iteration} of the editorial debate.
Read the chapter carefully from your editorial perspective.
React to what other editors have written in prior rounds above.
Where you agree, say so clearly. Where you disagree, argue your position
with evidence from the text. If you have changed your mind, say so.
Cover the areas most relevant to your role:
- Story structure and pacing
- Character voice and consistency
- Line-level clarity and prose quality
- Continuity with prior chapters and world rules
If the group has reached sufficient consensus for the polish step,
end your response with: CONSENSUS REACHED
- type: package
schema:
consensus_critique: string
chapter_verdict: string
key_changes: list
spawn:
- task_type: chapter_polish
task_name: "Polish: {chapter_ref}"
agent_name: Iris
context:
chapter_text: "{chapter_text}"
consensus_critique: "{consensus_critique}"
key_changes: "{key_changes}"
chapter_verdict: "{chapter_verdict}"
genre_name: "{genre_name}"
genre_audience: "{genre_audience}"
chapter_ref: "{chapter_ref}"
adjudication:
enabled: true
pass_threshold: 60
deliverable_type: coordination
criteria:
completeness:
weight: 40
description: "All viewpoints and concerns addressed"
consensus_clarity:
weight: 35
description: "Clear outcome or decision documented"
actionability:
weight: 25
description: "Next steps are concrete and assignable"